Answered: P is in dire need of cash. He then… | bartleby

Related questions

Question

P is in dire need of cash. He then approaches M and requests that M issue a negotiable bill of exhange in P's favor at P50,000 so that P can sell the instrument to A. So M issued a negotiable BOE to P, then P endorsed it to A. Upon due date of the said BOE, who are the primarily liable party/parties to the instrument who should pay A?

Expert Solution

Step by step

Solved in 2 steps

SEE SOLUTION Check out a sample Q&A here

Blurred answer

Similar questions

Explain the difference between a docketing fee and a cancellation fee of an arbitrator.
John goes to a bar. Harry starts to talk to him about a car he has for sale. John tells him he wishes he could buy the car but does not have that much cash. Harry tells John he can make payments over the next year. Harry writes on a napkin John shall pay me $100.00 per month for 12 months starting December 1, 2018. They both sign and date the napkin. Discuss whether this is a negotiable instrument. Defend your position. Ensure you discuss each element of negotiability.
Xavier purchased a condominium unit at Atmos Towers in January 2018 for P 3,000,000. In the agreement, Xavier will pay a 20% downpayment and thereafter pay a monthly installment fee of P 65,000 for 60 months. In June 2020, or after paying 29 monthly installments, Xavier failed to pay his obligations because his fast-food business went bankrupt due to the pandemic. (a) What are the rights of Xavier under the Maceda Law? (b) In the above case, how much is the cash surrender value that must be returned to Xavier in case he fails to pay after the grace period?
Sarah had a deposit in a savings account with Filipino Universal Bank in the amount of five million pesos (P5,000,000.00). To buy a new car, she obtained a loan from the same bank in the amount of P1,200,000.00, payable in twelve monthly installments. Sarah issued in favor of the bank post-dated checks, each in the amount of P100,000.00, to cover the twelve monthly installment payments. On the third, fourth and fifth months, the corresponding checks bounced.
4.Bryson issues a $5,000 negotiable check "payable to the order of Yolanda or cash." Yolanda places her signature on the back of the check. Yolanda then negotiates the check to Casey. Given these facts, which of the following is generally correct? а. The check was issued as a bearer instrument and Yolanda could not have converted it into an order instrument. b. Yolanda's indorsement on the instrument is not required in order for Casey to qualify or assert that he is a holder in due course. С. Yolanda's indorsement on the instrument is generally referred to as a special indorsement. d. Yolanda's indorsement on the instrument is required in order for Casey to qualify or assert that he is a holder in due course.
Granite Insurance Company entered into a treaty reinsurance agreement with Rock Solid Reinsurance (RSR). Granite's retention limit is $400,000 and RSR agreed to provide reinsurance for up to $2.0 million. If Granite writes an $800,000 policy, RSR is responsible for 50 percent of the losses. If Granite insures a $1.6 million risk, RSR is responsible for 75 percent of any losses. What type of reinsurance arrangement did Granite enter into with RSR? ما A) reinsurance pool B) surplus share reinsurance C) facultative reinsurance D) excess of loss reinsurance
Maia wrote a check that said "Pay to the order of Kevin Mathews $10.97." The next line of the check stated, "One thousand ninety-seven dollars." In applying the rules of interpretation, how much should the drawee pay? a. Nothing; when the instrument is ambiguous it is declared non-negotiable. b. $10.97; numbers control over words. c. One thousand, ninety-seven dollars, or $1,097.00. Words control over numbers. d. Parol evidence would be needed to determine the purpose of the check.
Shawn buys 50 widgets at a store closing sale. He buys the widgets intending to use them around the house. He only uses 25, though, and decides to sell the remaining widgets online. Shawn lives in Colorado. He finds an individual buyer, Victoria, in Italy. Does the CISG apply if there is an issue with this contract? O No, because at least one party must be a merchant. Yes, because the contract does not state that the CISG does not apply. O Yes, because the CISG automatically applies when two signatory country parties enter into a contract. No, because the contract does not state that the CISG applies. O No, because these are two consumers.
Andrew is an accountant. He agrees with George, a garage proprietor, that he will assist George with his annual tax return if George will service his car for him on the Monday. At the beginning of the negotiations Andrew told George that he absolutely must have the car for the following Tuesday since he needed it to go to an important meeting with a client to pitch for a valuable deal. Andrew assists George, but because the service was not done correctly the car breaks down when Andrew is on the way to the important meeting. Andrew is very late for this meeting and as a result the client switches his work, worth some £25,000, to another accountant. In addition Andrew incurs £500 costs putting right the defective service. Andrew now wishes to sue George for damages for breach of contract. Question 20 Is Andrew’s claim against George for putting right the defective service A a normal loss B an abnormal loss C neither a normal nor an abnormal loss D both a normal and an abnormal loss…
A rented a car owned by B for 50$ going to Seoul. Under the condition the A will cover the expenses for gasoline and will return the car after 18 hours. When A was already in Seoul, A parked the car in the park. The car was lost. The car is 700$ worth. What are A's obligations now under the concept of simple loan or mutuum? Will A just pay 50$ or 700$ to B?Explain. What should be the responsibility of A in relation to the lost rented-vehicle?
Under our NCC, an heir may institute an action for rescission of a rescissible contract in his capacity as a representative or successor-in-interest of a person who suffers from lesion or of the creditor who is defrauded. Suppose, however, that it can be established that the decedent, during his lifetime, entered into a contract with another in order to defraud him of his legitime, can he institute an action for the rescission of such contract after the death of the decedent?
5. List the six (6) types of contracts that must be in writing.

SEE MORE QUESTIONS