Maia wrote a check that said "Pay to the order of Kevin Mathews $10.97." The next line of the check stated, "One thousand ninety-seven dollars." In applying the rules of interpretation, how much should the drawee pay? a. Nothing; when the instrument is ambiguous it is declared non-negotiable. b. $10.97; numbers control over words. C. One thousand, ninety-seven dollars, or $1,097.00. Words control over numbers. d. Parol evidence would be needed to determine the purpose of the check.

icon
Related questions
Question
Maia wrote a check that said "Pay to the order of Kevin Mathews $10.97." The next line of the check stated, "One
thousand ninety-seven dollars." In applying the rules of interpretation, how much should the drawee pay?
a. Nothing; when the instrument is ambiguous it is declared non-negotiable.
b. $10.97; numbers control over words.
c. One thousand, ninety-seven dollars, or $1,097.00. Words control over numbers.
d. Parol evidence would be needed to determine the purpose of the check.
Transcribed Image Text:Maia wrote a check that said "Pay to the order of Kevin Mathews $10.97." The next line of the check stated, "One thousand ninety-seven dollars." In applying the rules of interpretation, how much should the drawee pay? a. Nothing; when the instrument is ambiguous it is declared non-negotiable. b. $10.97; numbers control over words. c. One thousand, ninety-seven dollars, or $1,097.00. Words control over numbers. d. Parol evidence would be needed to determine the purpose of the check.
Expert Solution
trending now

Trending now

This is a popular solution!

steps

Step by step

Solved in 3 steps

Blurred answer
Similar questions
  • SEE MORE QUESTIONS