1.A borrowed P30,000.00 from B to be paid on September 10, 2016, in exchange for the loan, A surrendered his Iphone7 to B as security. On September 11, 2016, B demanded that A pay the P30,000.00 loan. Since A do not have enough money, he just told B that B can just have his Iphone/ as payment for his loan to which B agreed. Is the contract extinguished? Explain . 2. A, B, C and D are the solidary debtors of X for 240,000. X released D from the payment of his share of P10,000. When the obligation became due and demandable, C turned out to be insolvent. Considering the said incidents, what are the liabilitites of A, B, C, and D? 3. Aida, Lorna and Fe borrowed money from Juan, Pedro and Mario P3,000.00. Aida's obligation is due today, September 5, 2019, Lorna is a minor and Fe's obligation is due on September 10, 2019. Can Pedro alone proceed against Lorna alone for the payment of the entire P3,000.00? Explain . 4.Explain and Give an example of the following modes of extinguishing an obligation. a. Confusion or merger b. Tender of Payment c. Novation d. Compensation 5.Define, Explain and give example of an option contract and explain its difference to an ordinary contract.

1.A borrowed P30,000.00 from B to be paid on September 10, 2016, in exchange for the loan, A surrendered his Iphone7 to B as security. On September 11, 2016, B demanded that A pay the P30,000.00 loan. Since A do not have enough money, he just told B that B can just have his Iphone/ as payment for his loan to which B agreed. Is the contract extinguished? Explain . 2. A, B, C and D are the solidary debtors of X for 240,000. X released D from the payment of his share of P10,000. When the obligation became due and demandable, C turned out to be insolvent. Considering the said incidents, what are the liabilitites of A, B, C, and D? 3. Aida, Lorna and Fe borrowed money from Juan, Pedro and Mario P3,000.00. Aida's obligation is due today, September 5, 2019, Lorna is a minor and Fe's obligation is due on September 10, 2019. Can Pedro alone proceed against Lorna alone for the payment of the entire P3,000.00? Explain . 4.Explain and Give an example of the following modes of extinguishing an obligation. a. Confusion or merger b. Tender of Payment c. Novation d. Compensation 5.Define, Explain and give example of an option contract and explain its difference to an ordinary contract.

Similar questions

Reed, a manager for XYZ Products, issued company checks to pay his personal debts. So that no one in the company would know what he was doing, he disguised the name of the payees. For example, to pay his American Credit Card bill, he issued the XYZ check to “American.” XYZ Products sued the recipients of the checks, such as American Credit Card, demanding that the funds be returned. The trial court ruled against XYZ Products concluding that the Defendant-Payee, American Credit Card, was a holder in due course and thus took the checks free of any claims or defenses. Was the trial court correct in ruling that American Credit Card is a holder in due course? Why? What law is applicable? Can Reed be held criminally liable for his actions? Why or why not? Can Reed be civilly liable for his actions? To whom might Reed be liable and for what? 4. What is the business lesson to be learned from this case? Is this a fair result based on public policy constructs applicable to property…
BUSINESS LAW BUSS2422 Akram posted the offer letter on 2 October 2020 to Salam to sell his Honda City for RM50 000 to be accepted by 10 October 2020. On 4 October 2020 Akram posted another letter to revoke his proposal. The revocation letter reached Salam on 9 October 2020. On 8 October 2020, Salam posted his acceptance letter accepting the proposal. Based on the facts above: (a) Advise Salam as to his legal rights against Akram in relation to the agreement. (b) Explain if your answer would be different if Salam posted the letter of acceptance after the letter of revocation reached him. Support your answer with relevant statutory provisions of the Contracts Act 1950 and decided cases. Format: Times New Roman 12 1% spacing Front cover - Standard Format Number of pages - Minimum 3 pages, maximum 5 pages
Joshua borrowed from Gerald an amount of P20,000 in money. Joshua ORALLY promised to pay it within 7 months and when he tries to pay it on the 8th month, Gerald demanded the payment of interest of 12% per annum because of Joshua’s delay in payment. Joshua paid his debt and the interest claimed by Gerald. After rethinking, Joshua demanded back from Gerald the amount he paid as interest. Gerald claims he has no obligation to return the interest paid by Joshua because it was a natural obligation which Joshua voluntarily performed and can no longer recover. Based on the problem given answer the following: a. Is the contention of Gerald correct? Why or why not? b. Can Joshua recover the interest he paid? Why or why not? c. Who is the obligor d. Who is the obligee e. What is the prestation f. What is the vinculum juris g. Distinguish Civil obligation vis-à-vis Natural Obligation.
Bill was appointed by Melinda to buy a painting at not more than $1 million. Bill eventually bought the painting for $1.2 million. Melinda wished to ratify Bill's act. Which of the following statements is CORRECT? Melinda could ratify if she did so soon after Bill's unauthorised act. Melinda could not ratify because Bill disobeyed her instructions. Bill had actual authority since he was appointed by Melinda to buy the painting. Melinda could still sue Bill for the price difference after ratifying his unauthorised act.
John goes to a bar. Harry starts to talk to him about a car he has for sale. John tells him he wishes he could buy the car but does not have that much cash. Harry tells John he can make payments over the next year. Harry writes on a napkin John shall pay me $100.00 per month for 12 months starting December 1, 2018. They both sign and date the napkin. Discuss whether this is a negotiable instrument. Defend your position. Ensure you discuss each element of negotiability.
Xavier purchased a condominium unit at Atmos Towers in January 2018 for P 3,000,000. In the agreement, Xavier will pay a 20% downpayment and thereafter pay a monthly installment fee of P 65,000 for 60 months. In June 2020, or after paying 29 monthly installments, Xavier failed to pay his obligations because his fast-food business went bankrupt due to the pandemic. (a) What are the rights of Xavier under the Maceda Law? (b) In the above case, how much is the cash surrender value that must be returned to Xavier in case he fails to pay after the grace period?
Buyer Bert can't believe that Seller Sam has had a last-second change of heart about entering into an agreement to sell his home to Bert. Sam has offered to refund Bert's earnest money and even pay him something in acknowledgment of Bert's inconvenience and disappointment, but Bert's not having it. He wants Sam's house. Choose the remedy for breach of trust that Bert will most likely take. demand specific performance initiate rescission accept compensatory damages settle for liquidated damages
4.Bryson issues a $5,000 negotiable check "payable to the order of Yolanda or cash." Yolanda places her signature on the back of the check. Yolanda then negotiates the check to Casey. Given these facts, which of the following is generally correct? а. The check was issued as a bearer instrument and Yolanda could not have converted it into an order instrument. b. Yolanda's indorsement on the instrument is not required in order for Casey to qualify or assert that he is a holder in due course. С. Yolanda's indorsement on the instrument is generally referred to as a special indorsement. d. Yolanda's indorsement on the instrument is required in order for Casey to qualify or assert that he is a holder in due course.
A man named Bob Smith believes that he is Santa Claus (who delivers presents to all the children around the world on Christmas Eve). In fact, he is not Santa, but he has believed this for many years. He signs his name "Santa." He signs many contracts as "Santa," and he refers to his wife as "Mrs. Claus" even though her name is actually Betty Smith. She puts up with it, because he really does believe he is Santa, and because she loves him and because his wages from his job at Hasbro toys pays the bills. One day he enters a contract with your company to hire you to build him a gigantic workshop in his backyard so he can build his toys and stable his "eight tiny reindeer." In return he will pay you $120,000 for the construction. When his wife learns of this deal, she tries to reject it because it is voidable due to his lack of contractual capacity. Was this contract voidable, or valid and enforceable? Answer the questions.
Identify and state the relevant facts in the case: [*1058] In addition, the Agreement authorizes Defendants to establish and fund a reserve account from Schnucks' payment card transactions to offset its indemnity obligations in an amount not to "exceed ... any current and anticipated Association fees or fines." (Bankcard [**6] Addendum at § 22.1) Schnucks alleges that following the data breach, "First Data received a preliminary case management report from MasterCard outlining the case management fee and the amount of monitoring/card replacement and fraud loss reimbursement it was assessing against Citicorp." (Compl. at ¶ 28) Based on the amount of MasterCard's assessment, First Data then projected the total amount of Visa's assessment (id. at ¶ 29), and established the reserve account by withholding a percentage each day from the funds it collected for Schnucks from its payment card transactions. (Id. at ¶¶ 30-31) Schnucks further alleges that Defendants have breached the Agreement…
Ramona Smith spilled orange juice on her computer two days before her term paper was due. Ramona desperately needed a new laptop, so she went online and found a laptop that fit her needs. She emailed the seller, Effie Frost, expressing her desire to purchase the laptop. Effie ernailed Ramona back and said that she (Effie) would sell Effie's laptop to Ramona for $300. An hour later, Ramona and Effie signed the following agreement: "1, Effie Frost, agree to sell my laptop computer to Ramona Smith for Four Hundred Dollars and zero cents. This is the entirety of the agreement. This agreement supersedes any and all other agreements made by the seller and the buyer." Ramona now claims that she should only pay $300 for the laptop because during that initial email exchange with Effie, Effie told Ramona that $300 was the price of the laptop, and she has the email exchange as evidence of the price quote of $300. What legal concept could be used to enforce the contract for $400? O Condition…
Gemma promises a local hardware store that she will pay for a lawn mower that her brother is purchasing on credit if the brother fails to pay the debt. Must this promise be in writing to be enforceable? Why or why not?