For an experiment on influencing the choices of others by offering undesirable alternatives, each of 103 college students selected three portable grills from five to display on a showroom floor. The students were instructed to include Grill #2 (a smaller-sized grill) and select the remaining two grills in the display to maximize purchases of Grill #2. If the six possible grill display combinations (1-2-3, 1-2-4, 1-2-5, 2-3-4, 2-3-5, and 2-4-5) were selected at random, then the proportion of students selecting any display was 1/6=0.167. One theory tested by the researcher was that the students would tend to choose the three-grill display so that Grill #2 was a compromise between a more desirable and a less desirable grill(that is, display 1-2-3, 1-2-4, or 1-2-5). Of the 103 students, 57 selected a three-grill display that was co
For an experiment on influencing the choices of others by offering undesirable alternatives, each of 103 college students selected three portable grills from five to display on a showroom floor. The students were instructed to include Grill #2 (a smaller-sized grill) and select the remaining two grills in the display to maximize purchases of Grill #2. If the six possible grill display combinations (1-2-3, 1-2-4, 1-2-5, 2-3-4, 2-3-5, and 2-4-5) were selected at random, then the proportion of students selecting any display was 1/6=0.167. One theory tested by the researcher was that the students would tend to choose the three-grill display so that Grill #2 was a compromise between a more desirable and a less desirable grill(that is, display 1-2-3, 1-2-4, or 1-2-5). Of the 103 students, 57 selected a three-grill display that was consistent with this theory. Use this information to test the theory proposed by the researcher at α=0.01.
Trending now
This is a popular solution!
Step by step
Solved in 2 steps
