For a situation to qualify as a class-action suit, it must: Multiple Choice 1. involve several people who have suffered the same problem. 2. involve a national retail store. 3. be a case that would not be handled by an attorney. 4. involve low-income individuals. 5. be a legal problem against a government agency. Don't answer by pen paper and don't use chatgpt otherwise we will give dounvote

For a situation to qualify as a class-action suit, it must: Multiple Choice 1. involve several people who have suffered the same problem. 2. involve a national retail store. 3. be a case that would not be handled by an attorney. 4. involve low-income individuals. 5. be a legal problem against a government agency. Don't answer by pen paper and don't use chatgpt otherwise we will give dounvote

Similar questions

A local builder offers to place with you insurance on every house he/she builds while it is under construction. In return, he/she wants you to allow him/her 20 % discount off the premium required by insurers. How would you respond to comply with RIBO Regulations? OA) You can only allow a five percent (5%) discount because of your overhead and expenses. OB) You will pay the builder a flat $10.00 fee for each house, but it is contrary to RIBO Regulations to discount the premium. OC) You refuse to pay the builder anything, since it would contravene RIBO Regulations. OD) You offer the builder a 20% premium refund for those houses that have no claims while under construction.
One of these cases, discussed in lectures and/or the texts, is not properly matched with the concept after it. Pick that mismatched case. OA 1998 federal appeals court case holding a business liable for customers' conduct toward an employee of that business; the manager of the business, despite the employee's plea that she not deal with these customers, ordered her to keep serving the customers - The case concerned a hostile work environment constituting sexual harassment. OA 2015 U.S. Supreme Court decision considering an employer's failure to try to learn about a job applicant's religious practices, so that the employer did not know how to accommodate these practices, if reasonably possible - The case concerned a failure-to-hire in violation of Title VII. O A 1998 U.S. Supreme Court case involving a substantial limitation on a life activity: reproduction - The case concerned the Pregnancy Discrimination Act. O The offshore oil rig U.S. Supreme Court case of 1998- The case concerned…
Give 1 importance of analyzing determinate thing and indeterminate thing in Business Law Give 1 importance of analyzing delay in Business Law Give 1 importance of analyzing the fruits under the law in Business Law
Becky Fenton has 25/60/10 automobile insurance coverage. If two other people are awarded $33,000 each for injuries in an auto accident in which Becky was judged at fault, how much of this judgment would the insurance cover?
Bobby is an investment banker in NYC. Although he currently has several criminal charges pending against him, Bobby is being sued by Alyssa in civil court for "emotional damages" due to a very public and embarrassing breakup in one of her favorite restaurants. Alyssa had already sued him once previously for this exact same issue in the exact same court of law. Alyssa's most recent lawsuit would be denied by this court of law on the grounds of what legal principle? O Dyads O Dicta O Double jeopardy O Lex Talionis O Res Judicata
1) A misdemeanor is a more serious crime than a felony. Why its false? 2) You accidentally take someone’s mink coat by mistake. You have committed theft. Why its false? 3) Robbery is the taking of property without force. Why its false? 4) If you find a signed and endorsed check, and you cash it, you have committed forgery. Why its false? 5) If you break into an apartment in order to escape a meteor shower, you have committed burglary. Why its false? 6) If a bank robber forces you, a bank customer, to kill a teller, and you do, you will be found innocent. Why its false? 7) If you buy a stolen 60-inch television out of the back of a truck at 2am for $15, you have committed no crime. Why its false? 8) If a person is a suspect in a crime, they mut cooperate fully with law enforcement and answer all questions. Why its false? 9) If you get drunk and then rob a bank, you will be found not guilty. Why its false? 10) A person is guilty of shoplifting if they take merchandise from one part of…
What role does comity play in the Court’s analysis in Hoffman-La Roche Ltd. v. Empagran S.A. (page 647)? Why does the Court in Empagran reject the case-by-case approach to comity suggested by the respondents? Only typing answer Please explain step by step
pls help ASAP
The case of ASIC v Adler involved another example where the Court lifted the corporate veil and penalized the individual decision-makers for breaching multiple rules in the Corporations Act. Do an internet search and see if you can work out how many of the following Director Duties were breached by the company's director, Ronny Adler? Select one: Duty not to improperly use your position (Corporations Act s182) Duty to act in good faith and for a proper purpose(Corporations Act s181) Corporations Act s 184 PLUS all of the above Duty to act with care and diligence (Corporations Act s180) Duty not to improperly use information for private gain or to harm the company (Corporations Act s183)
pls help asap
Luzmia loves all animals and is starting a new grooming business for dogs, but she thinks some local regulations make no sense. For example, there is a local ordinance that all dogs must be kept on a leash at all times when not in a fenced area. Luzmia knows that members of the community have had success in changing local regulations by petitioning the city council. She plans to proceed in that manner to attempt a change in the leash law. Luzmia's plan to seek change through following what others have done in the past by petitioning city council is rooted in which of the following? Natural law Legal realism Legal positivism The historical school Cost-benefit analysis
Pls help ASAP