In two different Supreme Court opinions concerning the right to counsel, the Court has said that a defendant needs the “guiding hand of counsel” and “lawyers are necessities, not luxuries”. What do you think the Court was trying to say? Should these ideas apply to municipal courts? Why or why not?

icon
Related questions
Question

In two different Supreme Court opinions concerning the right to counsel, the Court has said that a defendant needs the “guiding hand of counsel” and “lawyers are necessities, not luxuries”. What do you think the Court was trying to say? Should these ideas apply to municipal courts? Why or why not?

Expert Solution
trending now

Trending now

This is a popular solution!

steps

Step by step

Solved in 4 steps

Blurred answer
Similar questions
  • SEE MORE QUESTIONS