Economics Consider the ultimatum and dictator games. a) Briefly explain the general experimental findings about how individuals play these games. How do they compare with the game theoretic predictions? b) How do social preferences explain behavior in these experiments? c) Real world experiences have an impact on experimental behavior. Explain how real world experiences could affect behavior in each of theses experiments. d) Suppose that you would like to increase the amount that is sent in these experiments. Can you think of a way to to this? e) Suppose that individuals play first a dictator game and then an ultimatum game with the roles reversed, i.e. the sender in the dictator game is the receiver in the ultimatum game. Given what you know about individuals' behavior, how do you think that players will play? Explain.

Economics Consider the ultimatum and dictator games. a) Briefly explain the general experimental findings about how individuals play these games. How do they compare with the game theoretic predictions? b) How do social preferences explain behavior in these experiments? c) Real world experiences have an impact on experimental behavior. Explain how real world experiences could affect behavior in each of theses experiments. d) Suppose that you would like to increase the amount that is sent in these experiments. Can you think of a way to to this? e) Suppose that individuals play first a dictator game and then an ultimatum game with the roles reversed, i.e. the sender in the dictator game is the receiver in the ultimatum game. Given what you know about individuals' behavior, how do you think that players will play? Explain.

ENGR.ECONOMIC ANALYSIS

14th Edition

ISBN:9780190931919

Author:NEWNAN

Publisher:NEWNAN

Chapter1: Making Economics Decisions

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 1QTC

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

in the text, the author describes an experiment in which a group of children were told a hypothetical story in which an adult punished a neutral act, such as a child practicing a musical instrument. Afterward, the children classified the act of playing a musical instrument as bad behavior. This experiment lends credence to the power of: a. modeling. b. reinforcement. c. the “blank slate.” d. cognitive dissonance.
As we learned in the video, Sheldon is trying to decide between purchasing an XBox and purchasing a PlayStation. Each system has its pros and cons. Sheldon is willing to pay up to $300 for the XBox, which costs $249. He is willing to pay up to $500 for the PlayStation, which costs $499. Regardless of which game system he buys, Sheldon plans to purchase a third-party warranty for $20. Let's calculate Sheldon's opportunity cost of purchasing each system. V 3rd attempt Part 1 What is Sheldon's opportunity cost if he buys the XBox? $ Part 2 What is Sheldon's opportunity cost if he buys the PlayStation? $ See Hint See Hint
On Sundays, people in Los Angeles consider a boat to Catalina Island to spend the day on the beach there. The utility that a person gets from visiting Catalina is 1-[n/10] – p , where n is the number of visitors on the island and p is the price of round-trip transportation (by boat). (Note that a visitor obtains more satisfaction if there are fewer other visitors on the island). The utility of staying home is zero. In equilibrium, how many people visit the island on a given Sunday? ( Your answer should depend on p.)
What would behavioral economics say about each of the following statements? a. “Nobody is truly charitable-people donate money just to show off." b. “America has a ruthless capitalist system. Considerations of fairness are totally ignored." c. “Selfish people always get ahead. It's like nobody even notices!"
Rajiv is training for a biathlon, a winter racing sport that combines cross-country skiing and rifle shooting. Consider the following scenario: Rajiv has only 15 hours available to devote to his training this week. Each hour he spends skiing is one hour that cannot be spent working onhis shooting. Which basic principle of individual choice do these statements best illustrate? People face trade-offs. Rajiv has an incentive to spend more time on skiing than on shooting. People usually exploit opportunities to make themselves better off. Rajiv can use time most efficiently by spending the same amounts of time on skiing and shooting.
d) Another classmate cares more about good grades: She gets 50 units of happiness for a B and 80 units of happiness for an A. If this classmate were your partner (but your preferences remained the same), how would your answers to parts (a) and (b) change? Which of the two classmates would you prefer as a partner? Would she also want you as a partner?
Identify a personal economic decision that was driven by a behavioral bias rather than by pure rational behavior. Given your understanding of behavioral economics, how would your decision differ today? Please provide a detailed discussion. I will not give a positive rating for vague responses.
Auto Bull Eye offers a 10-minute oil change and 30-minute brake check. There are two technicians who perform each of these services. Next week, the shop is offering a discounted oil change. How might this affect the production possibilities curve for next week? The shop would decrease the brake-check price to eliminate scarcity. The shop would increase worker pay to make up for the opportunity cost of not doing brake checks. The shop would shift production to oil changes and away from brake checks. The shop would shift production to brake checks and away from oil changes.
Which of the following about emotional influence on decision making is true? People generally make rational decisions that maximize desirable outcomes in the absence of emotions Only emotions that are relevant to the decision at hand have any influence on that decision People tend to overestimate their predicted negative emotions resulting from a decision's outcomes People are equally angry about unfair offers in the ultimatum game from computers and from other human players
In experiments in which participants voluntarily contribute to the provision of a public good, we often find a reduction in contributions in successive rounds of the experiment. We can explain this as Group of answer choices Evidence of participants reaching satiation and not wanting such high levels of the public good. Evidence of participants working out the Nash equilibrium outcome of the voluntary contribution game. Evidence of participants reducing cooperation to punish free riding. Evidence of participants learning how to play the game more effectively.
An old lady is looking for help crossing the street. Only one person is needed to help her; if more people help her, this is no better. You and I are the two people in the vicinity who can help; we have to choose simultaneously whether to do so. Each of us will get pleasure worth a 3 from her success (no matter who helps her), But each one who goes to help will bear a cost of 1, this being the value of our time taken up in helping. If neither player helps, the payoff for each player is zero. Set up this game in strategic form.
Problem: Imagine you have two competing athletes who have the option to use an illegal and dangerous drug to enhance their performance (i.e., dope). If neither athlete dopes, then neither gain an advantage. If only one dopes, then that athlete gains a massive advantage over their competitor, reduced by the medical and legal risks of doping (the athletes believe the advantage over their competitor outweighs the risks from doping ). However, if both athletes dope, the advantages cancel out, and only the risks remain, putting them both in a worse position than if neither had been doping. What outcome do we expect from these two athletes? Please use ideas like concepts of monopolies, Oligopolies and Game Theory and Factor markets for this scenario.