Do you think Ms. Browne Sanders had the basis for a sexual harassment suit? Why? I think Ms. Browne Sanders had a valid basis for a sexual harassment suit against the New York Knicks and her coach. The jury found that she was harassed and that the Knicks retaliated against her for it. According to the New York Times article, the evidence used in court showed a pattern of inappropriate behavior by Thomas, and this created a hostile work environment for her. Sexual harassment cases often use circumstantial evidence rather than direct proof, as harassment usually doesn't leave much concrete evidence. The Employee Rights Attorney Group article explains that harassment is illegal if it changes an employee's work conditions, making it difficult to do their job. Browne Sanders’ case cleared this bar, as she lost her job after reporting the harassment. Her claims were credible because a jury determined that the Knicks organization failed to address the issue appropriately. Retaliation can also be used as a crucial piece of workplace harassment claims. The Employee Rights Attorney Group article states that an employer is responsible if they don't take immediate action after receiving a complaint. Browne Sanders was fired soon after speaking out, which helps prove the fact that she was wrongfully terminated. The Knicks’ failure to prevent harassment and their retaliatory actions strengthened her case. Based on the legal definitions and evidence presented, Ms. Browne Sanders had a strong foundation for her lawsuit. The jury’s verdict confirms that her claims were legitimate, and she was right to pursue legal action. do you agree? why
Do you think Ms. Browne Sanders had the basis for a sexual harassment suit? Why?
I think Ms. Browne Sanders had a valid basis for a sexual harassment suit against the New York Knicks and her coach. The jury found that she was harassed and that the Knicks retaliated against her for it. According to the New York Times article, the evidence used in court showed a pattern of inappropriate behavior by Thomas, and this created a hostile work environment for her. Sexual harassment cases often use circumstantial evidence rather than direct proof, as harassment usually doesn't leave much concrete evidence. The Employee Rights Attorney Group article explains that harassment is illegal if it changes an employee's work conditions, making it difficult to do their job. Browne Sanders’ case cleared this bar, as she lost her job after reporting the harassment. Her claims were credible because a jury determined that the Knicks organization failed to address the issue appropriately. Retaliation can also be used as a crucial piece of workplace harassment claims. The Employee Rights Attorney Group article states that an employer is responsible if they don't take immediate action after receiving a complaint. Browne Sanders was fired soon after speaking out, which helps prove the fact that she was wrongfully terminated. The Knicks’ failure to prevent harassment and their retaliatory actions strengthened her case. Based on the legal definitions and evidence presented, Ms. Browne Sanders had a strong foundation for her lawsuit. The jury’s verdict confirms that her claims were legitimate, and she was right to pursue legal action.
do you agree? why
Step by step
Solved in 2 steps
