Corinne is an attorney in France. Corinne is representing a client in a dispute over a franchiseagreement. The judge wants to decide which witnesses to call and interrogate the witnesses. Is thisproper?O Yes, but only insofar as France has abandoned the common law and adopted the Civil Code.O No. France follows the adversarial system.O Yes. France follows the inquisitorial system.O No. In France, the entire trial process is controlled by the huissiers.O No. In France, the judge often decides which witnesses are relevant, but only the lawyers may interrogate thewitnesses and investigate the facts.

In this legal scenario, Corinne, a French attorney, is representing a client involved in a franchise…

Answered: Corinne is an attorney in France.…

Similar questions

If a person was found guilty for assault and battery in a criminal case, and the person that was hurt brings a civil action against the defendant, does a full trial have to be held again or can the jury just accept the fact that the defendant committed the act?
"7. Freedom of Speech. Wandering Dago, Inc. (WD), operates a food truck in Albany, New York. WD brands itself and the food it sells with language generally viewed as ethnic slurs. Owners Andrea Loguidice and Brandon Snooks, however, view the branding as giving a “nod to their Italian heritage” and “weakening the derogatory force of the slur.” Twice, WD applied to participate as a vendor in a summer lunch program in a state-owned plaza. Both times, the New York State Office of General Services (OGS) denied the appli-cation because of WD’s branding. WD filed a suit in a federal district court against RoAnn Destito, the commissioner of OGS, contending that the agency had violated WD’s right to free speech. What principles apply to the government’s regula-tion of the content of speech? How do those principles apply in WD’s case? Explain. [Wandering Dago, Inc. v. Destito, 879 F.3d 20 (2d Cir. 2018)] (See Business and the Bill of Rights.)"
Rose is recovering from recent abdominal surgery and is suffering from intense pain. She has an MRI, which shows surgical gauze left in her abdomen. Rose may sue under O O O O a. strict liability. b. res ipsa loquitur. c. product liability. d. an intentional tort.
In order to police the profession, the state legislature has just passed a law permitting the State Plumbers’ Association the power to hold hearings to determine whether a particular plumber has violated the plumbing code of ethics, written by the association. Sam, a plumber, objects to the convening of a hearing when he is accused by Roger, a fellow plumber, of acting unethically by soliciting business from Roger’s customers. Sam goes to court, seeking to enjoin the association’s disciplinary committee from holding the hearing. What is the result? How would you argue Sam’s case? The association’s case? Note:- Do not provide handwritten solution. Maintain accuracy and quality in your answer. Take care of plagiarism. Answer completely. You will get up vote for sure.
True-False and Multiple Choice Questions. 1. A trial de novo is a trial with new discovery, testimony, and evidence.2. If th Delaware Court of Common Pleas (a general trail court and court of record) makes a common law decision, that decision becomes precedent for all Delaware courts.3. Primary methods of alternative dispute resolution include litigation, mediation and arbitration.4. Delivering the complaint and attached summons to the defendant establishes in personam judgment for the court,5. Sandra sued her employer, Cape Inc., claiming that she was wrongfully terminated from her is a criminal lawsuit.6. The jury decides the law and the judge decides the facts.7. The categorical imperative approach to ethical decision making is to ask the following question â€œwhich alternative causes the greatest good (or least harm) to the most people?â€8. A summons is a paper ordering a defendant to answer a complaint within a certain time.9. According to the…
Criminal Law Ms. Cauliflower lived in a small community just outside of Houston which had mostly older retired residents. The neighbors were very nosy and watched everything that went on at other people’s houses. Ms. Cauliflower had eye disease and worked only part time. She liked to listen to a podcast about how the federal government did not have the right to deny citizens their right to regulate medications. The podcast preached that citizens had a right to create their own medicine and to use these medicines for their diseases. On October 31st, Agent Batwing waited until about 7:00 p.m. and sat in a truck with a thermal-imaging device across the street from Mr. Cauliflower’s house. He looked like a parent who was watching his child Trick or Treat. He had obtained a warrant to search Mr. Cauliflower’s house based on information from two of the neighbors. They said that groups of blind looking people would stumble out of Ms. Cauliflower’s house every Wednesday. They also said…
23. Which of the following is based on the moral norms and principles that say all human beings are empowered to do something or have something done for them?a. Human rightsb. Legal rightsc. Constitutional rightsd. Jurisdictional rights