Consider the 2-player, zero-sum game "Rock, Paper, Scissors". Each player choos one of 3 strategies: rock, paper, or scissors. Then, both players reveal their choices The outcome is determined as follows. If both players choose the same strategy neither player wins or loses anything. Otherwise: "paper covers rock": if one player chooses paper and the other chooses rock, the player who chose paper wins and is paid 1 by the other player. • "scissors cut paper": if one player chooses scissors and the other chooses paper, the player who chose scissors wins and is paid 1 by the other player. • "rock breaks scissors": if one player chooses rock and the other player chooses scissors the player

Consider the 2-player, zero-sum game "Rock, Paper, Scissors". Each player choos one of 3 strategies: rock, paper, or scissors. Then, both players reveal their choices The outcome is determined as follows. If both players choose the same strategy neither player wins or loses anything. Otherwise: "paper covers rock": if one player chooses paper and the other chooses rock, the player who chose paper wins and is paid 1 by the other player. • "scissors cut paper": if one player chooses scissors and the other chooses paper, the player who chose scissors wins and is paid 1 by the other player. • "rock breaks scissors": if one player chooses rock and the other player chooses scissors the player

Microeconomic Theory

12th Edition

ISBN:9781337517942

Author:NICHOLSON

Publisher:NICHOLSON

Chapter15: Imperfect Competition

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 15.7P

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

2. Consider the following game. Two criminals are thinking about pulling off a bank robbery. The take from the bank would be $20,000 each, but the job requires two people (one to rob the bank and one to drive the getaway car. Each criminal could instead rob a liquor store. The take from robing a liquor store is only $1000 but can be done with one person acting alone. Write the payoff matrix of this game Player A Bank job Liqour store Player B Bank job Liquor store a. What are the Nash equilibria in this game? b. Explain why there can be multiple equilibria in this game. c. How the game will be played if mixed strategies are allowed? Discuss.
The following table contains the possible actions and payoffs of players 1 and 2. Player 1 U M D L 2,10 2,5 8,7 Player 2 C 5,2 11,8 8,4 R 5,4 2,9 8,3 This is a simultaneous move game. In a pure strategy Nash equilibrium of this game, Player 1 receives a payoff of ✓and player 2 receives a payoff of If, instead of playing simultaneously, player 2 moves first, then in the Nash equilibrium player 1 receives a payoff of ✓and player 2 receives a payoff of
II. Determine which of the following two-person zero-sum games are strictly determinable and fair. Give the optimum strategies for each player in the case of it being strictly determinable. a- Player A Player B B1 B2 B3 A1 8 2 4 A2 5 -1 3 b. II II V V I -4 -2 -2 1 A II 1 -1 III -6 -5 -2 -4 4 IV 3 1 -6 0 -8 3.
1. Consider the game where initially She chooses between "Stay Home" and "Go Out". If She chooses "Stay Home" then She gets 2 and He gets 0. If She chooses "Go Out" then they each simultaneously choose "Movie" or "Concert" where the payoffs are 0,1 or 3 as in the Battle of the Sexes Game. What are the subgame perfect Nash Equilibria of this game ?
Make sure you clearly write your name and submission:. 1. Consider the 2-player, zero-sum game "Rock, Paper, Scissors". Each player chooses one of 3 strategies: rock, paper, or scissors. Then, both players reveal their choices. The outcome is determined as follows. If both players choose the same strategy, neither player wins or loses anything. Otherwise: • "paper covers rock": if one player chooses paper and the other chooses rock, the player who chose paper wins and is paid 1 by the other player. • "scissors cut paper": if one player chooses scissors and the other chooses paper, the player who chose scissors wins and is paid 1 by the other player. • "rock breaks scissors": if one player chooses rock and the other player chooses scissors, the player who chose rock wins and is paid 1 by the other player. We can write the payoff matrix for this game as follows: rock paper -1 0 1 rock 0 paper 1 scissors -1 (a) Show that this game does not have a pure Nash equilibrium. 1 X 3 (b) Show that…
5 Suppose two players play one of the two normal-form games shown in Figure 1. L U 0,-1 D 2,4 R 2,0 6,0 L U | 4,-1 D 2,-2 R 2,0Now suppose that Player 2 knows which game is being played, but Player 1 does not. Find the pure strategy Bayesian Nash equilibrium of this game.
GAME 5 Player B B2 B1 Player A A1 7, 3 5, 10 A2 3, 8 9, 6 In Game 5 above, O there are no Nash equilibria in pure strategies. Player A choosing A1 and Player B choosing B2 is a Nash equilibrium. O Player A choosing A1 and Player B choosing B1 is a Nash equilibrium. O Player A choosing A2 and Player B choosing B1 is a Nash equilibrium.
Consider the 2-player, zero-sum game "Rock, Paper, Scissors". Each player chooses one of 3 strategies: rock, paper, or scissors. Then, both players reveal their choices. The outcome is determined as follows. If both players choose the same strategy, neither player wins or loses anything. Otherwise: "paper covers rock": if one player chooses paper and the other chooses rock, the player who chose paper wins and is paid 1 by the other player. "scissors cut paper": if one player chooses scissors and the other chooses paper, the player who chose scissors wins and is paid 1 by the other player. "rock breaks scissors": if one player chooses rock and the other player chooses scissors, the player who chose rock wins and is paid 1 by the other player. We can write the payoff matrix for this game as follows: rock paper scissors rock 0 paper 1 0 scissors 2. Suppose now we alter the game so that whenever Colin chooses "paper" the loser pays the winner 3 instead of 1: rock paper scissors rock 0…
Keith and Blake play a simultaneous one-shot game given by the following table: Blake Left Right Keith Top Bottom 4.00, -5.00 0.00, -6.00 5.00, 0.00 -2.00, 7.00 As there is no unique pure strategy Nash equilibrium, assume that each player plays each of his choices half of the time. What is the average payoff for Keith? | What is the average payoff for Blake? (Round to two decimals if necessary.) (Round to two decimals if necessary.)
5. Consider a simultaneous game in which player A chooses one of two actions (Up or Down), and B chooses one of two actions (Left or Right). The game has the following payoff matrix, where the first payoff in each entry is for A and the second for B.(8 points) B Right Left 3,3 5,1 Down 2,2 4,4 a. Find the Nash equilibrium or equilibria. b. Which player, if any, has a dominant strategy? A Up
5. Aaron and Betty play the following one-shot game. Aaron Up Middle Down Left 10,0 5,10 1,1 Betty Right 0,5 1,0 2,2 a. Does the game above have any (pure strategy) Nash equilibria? Find any equilibria or explain why an equilibrium doesn't exist. b. Suppose instead that Aaron moves first and Betty moves second. Represent this situation with a game tree and find the subgame perfect Nash equilibrium. Are Aaron and Betty better off playing a simultaneous game or a sequential game in which Aaron moves first? Explain. c.
Question 4. Zeynep and Mehmet will eventually play the following game. Mehmet L R U 3,1 0,0 Zeynep D 0,3 1,3 In a preliminary stage, Zeynep has already asked Mehmet to allow her to move first and proposed to pay him 1 unit of her own payoff in exchange. So Mehmet has to options: • If he accepts Zeynep's offer: they will play the sequential move version of the above game in which Zeynep moves first. Mehmet will receive 1 unit of utility more, and Zeynep will receive 1 unit of utility less (in any outcome of the game) compared to the payoffs given in the bimatrix. 2 • If he rejects Zeynep's offer: they will play the simultaneous move game. a. Represent this strategic interaction in a game tree. b. How many information sets does each player have? c. Characterize the set of pure strategies for both players. d. Present this game as a normal-form game, and characterize the set of pure strategy Nash equi- libria.