Choice of region/nation/nation-state and 3 aspects of globalisation?
Choice of region/nation/nation-state and 3 aspects of
globalisation?
In academic writing, globalisation is usually broken down into three main groups: economic globalization, cultural globalization, and political globalization.
Politics, public policy, administration, and inter-institutional linkages within nations are all undergoing profound changes as a result of economic, social, demographic, and technological factors. Despite being met with a number of divergent viewpoints, globalisation is proceeding nevertheless, much to the irritation and disappointment of many, most notably the GS (Global South). One of the most contentious claims made against globalisation is that it is an economic monster out to destroy the independence of individual nations – economically, politically, and socially. The nation-state, in reality, is seen as a weak participant in the process, as it lacks the authority to govern or have a democratic say on the ideas and practises that support the gospel of globalisation.
According to Burbules and Torres (2000, p. 14), several fundamental features of globalisation have had a profound impact on the nation-state.They divided the causes into economic (such as the rise of globally targeted advertising and consumption; the lowering of barriers to the free movement of goods, workers, and investments across national borders; and the consequent new stresses on the traditional division of labour in society); and political causes (where there is a loss of nation-state sovereignty, or at least an erosion of national autonomy, and, as a result, a weakening of national sovereignty). The globalisation of the nation-state is putting pressure on governments to adopt global policies in order to address a wide range of "intermistic" political, economic, and cultural issues that cross national boundaries. These economic and political difficulties brought on by globalisation need to be dealt with critically if there is to be any improvement.
Because of globalization's dominance of the GN (Global North), dominated by transnational corporations, over the GS (Global South), the latter has been subjected to unprecedented economic hardship. The 1999 WTO protests in Seattle are emblematic of the global working class's resentment of the globalisation policies that have led to their worsening living conditions. The working class lacks political influence because it does not control the means of production. The term "global corporation," in Berberoglu's view, is less misleading, but it still gives the impression that the organisation speaks for the needs of every person on the planet (2005). More and more economists are using the term "transnational businesses." All of these corporations believe that the globe is their oyster, and that they can make enormous sums of money by cornering markets in as many nations as possible. To make the transition to market liberalisation as smooth as possible, they must first liberalise democracy (essentially accepting the capitalist model of government). In a nutshell, the conditions under which a national government should function are, in a nutshell, determined by global changes. As was already said, it is of the utmost importance to make sure that local administrative rules are in line with the needs of globalization.
Governments can only do so much to counter the hegemonic, unjust, and overlapping economic inequities of international organisations like the International Monetary Fund (IMF), World Bank (WB), and World Trade Organization (WTO). As the most powerful financial and corporate entities gradually take control as a result of globalisation, the sovereignty of nation-states is shifting. For national governments, Adams et al. argue that globalisation has created a setting in which their control over domestic political and economic matters is severely limited. Also, the decolonization-era gains in sovereignty that many emerging nations made are quickly eroding. Unfortunately, under capitalism, wealth growth through private firms is prioritised over giving all people within nation-states a stake in their own riches. Because globalisation leads to the rise of weak governments, which in turn weakens democracy, we can be certain that civil society will remain in disorder and be doomed unless there is a strong democracy.
Step by step
Solved in 2 steps
