Ch 3, q2. Suppose we have a small inhabited island with three residents and a volcano that generates air pollution. Two people live upwind of the volcano and one person lives down- wind. For $21,000 we can clean up the volcano with a patented "smoke guzzler". The two upwind people would pay $1000 each to get rid of the smoke whereas the downwind person would pay $15,000. Consider two plans to finance the "smoke guzzler". Plan A calls for a head-tax of $7000. Plan B calls for the affected party (the downwind person) to pay $21,000 and everyone else nothing. Compare each plan to the status quo and indicate society's choice using (a) the Pareto criterion; (b) majority rule; (c) potential Pareto improvement.

ENGR.ECONOMIC ANALYSIS
14th Edition
ISBN:9780190931919
Author:NEWNAN
Publisher:NEWNAN
Chapter1: Making Economics Decisions
Section: Chapter Questions
Problem 1QTC
icon
Related questions
Question
Ch 3, q2. Suppose we have a small inhabited island with three residents and a volcano that
generates air pollution. Two people live upwind of the volcano and one person lives down-
wind. For $21,000 we can clean up the volcano with a patented "smoke guzzler". The two
upwind people would pay $1000 each to get rid of the smoke whereas the downwind person
would pay $15,000. Consider two plans to finance the "smoke guzzler". Plan A calls for a
head-tax of $7000. Plan B calls for the affected party (the downwind person) to pay $21,000
and everyone else nothing. Compare each plan to the status quo and indicate society's choice
using (a) the Pareto criterion; (b) majority rule; (c) potential Pareto improvement.
Transcribed Image Text:Ch 3, q2. Suppose we have a small inhabited island with three residents and a volcano that generates air pollution. Two people live upwind of the volcano and one person lives down- wind. For $21,000 we can clean up the volcano with a patented "smoke guzzler". The two upwind people would pay $1000 each to get rid of the smoke whereas the downwind person would pay $15,000. Consider two plans to finance the "smoke guzzler". Plan A calls for a head-tax of $7000. Plan B calls for the affected party (the downwind person) to pay $21,000 and everyone else nothing. Compare each plan to the status quo and indicate society's choice using (a) the Pareto criterion; (b) majority rule; (c) potential Pareto improvement.
Expert Solution
steps

Step by step

Solved in 2 steps with 3 images

Blurred answer
Similar questions
Recommended textbooks for you
ENGR.ECONOMIC ANALYSIS
ENGR.ECONOMIC ANALYSIS
Economics
ISBN:
9780190931919
Author:
NEWNAN
Publisher:
Oxford University Press
Principles of Economics (12th Edition)
Principles of Economics (12th Edition)
Economics
ISBN:
9780134078779
Author:
Karl E. Case, Ray C. Fair, Sharon E. Oster
Publisher:
PEARSON
Engineering Economy (17th Edition)
Engineering Economy (17th Edition)
Economics
ISBN:
9780134870069
Author:
William G. Sullivan, Elin M. Wicks, C. Patrick Koelling
Publisher:
PEARSON
Principles of Economics (MindTap Course List)
Principles of Economics (MindTap Course List)
Economics
ISBN:
9781305585126
Author:
N. Gregory Mankiw
Publisher:
Cengage Learning
Managerial Economics: A Problem Solving Approach
Managerial Economics: A Problem Solving Approach
Economics
ISBN:
9781337106665
Author:
Luke M. Froeb, Brian T. McCann, Michael R. Ward, Mike Shor
Publisher:
Cengage Learning
Managerial Economics & Business Strategy (Mcgraw-…
Managerial Economics & Business Strategy (Mcgraw-…
Economics
ISBN:
9781259290619
Author:
Michael Baye, Jeff Prince
Publisher:
McGraw-Hill Education