Robert and Bruce have identical marginal private cost curves and demand curves and use the same amount of land to grazetheir mules. They both have access to a common grazing area, which must only be maintained on a volunteer basis. If theyhad to maintain the land, it would cost each person an additional $200. The maximum sustainable quantity of grazinganimals on the land is 14.The graph depicts the marginal private cost curves and thefarmers' individual demand curves, which are identical for800each farmer.Individual farmer's demand700600Individual farmer's supply500400300200100101214161820Ouantity of AnimalsCost ($)co Assume that Robert and Bruce do not contribute to maintaining the land. How many total mules will both farmers graze onthe common?Is this sustainable?number of mules:6yesnoSuppose that Robert and Bruce form a common's association with a membership fee that goes to maintaining the land. Thisfee is equal to the cost of maintaining land. Shift each person's marginal private cost curve on the given graph so that itincludes this fee.How many mules will both farmers now graze on the commons?Is this sustainable?number of mules:14yes

1) If the Robert and Bruce are not contribute to maintain the land. The marginal private cost of and…

Answered: Robert and Bruce have identical…

ENGR.ECONOMIC ANALYSIS

14th Edition

ISBN:9780190931919

Author:NEWNAN

Publisher:NEWNAN

Chapter1: Making Economics Decisions

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 1QTC

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

Firms A and B each produce 80 units of pollution. The federal government wants to reduce pollution levels. The marginal costs associated with pollution reduction are MCA = 50 + 3QA for firm A and MCB = 20 + 6QB for firm B, where QA and QB are the quantities of pollution reduced by each firm. Society's marginal benefit from pollution reduction is given by MB = 590- 3Qtot, where Qtot is the total reduction in pollution. The socially optimal level of firm A's pollution reduction is Hint: Type integers. reduction is The socially optimal level of firm B's pollution
This is an end-of-chapter problem that I'm struggling with! thanks!
Please label the graph point where the socially optimal equilibrium is
Provide a reason why the marginal damages from some emissions may be increasing with the level of emissions (like in the figure above). Suppose the unregulated level of emissions is E3. What area(s) represent the total damages from unregulated emissions? Suppose emissions levels drop from E3 to E1. What area(s) represent the total benefits from the emissions reduction from E3 to E1? What point denotes the marginal damage from emissions at E2?
Parks confer many external benefits on society: open space, trees that reduce pollution, and so on. Therefore, the market equilibrium quantity of parks is not equal to the socially optimal quantity. The following graph shows the demand for parks (their private value), the supply of parks (the private cost of producing them), and the social value of parks, including both the private value and external benefits. Use the black point (plus symbol) to indicate the market equilibrium quantity. Next, use the purple point (diamond symbol) to indicate the socially optimal quantity.
No hand written solution Afirm has an industrial plant that emits pollutants into a town’s lake. The plant’s marginal abatement function is MAC= 200 – 0.5E and damages caused by its emissions are given by MD = 2E where emissions are in kg. per day. What is the socially efficient level of emissions from this plant? Illustrate this in a graph. As an incentive to reduce emissions to the socially efficient level, government offers to pay the firm for each kg. of emissions it abates per day from this plant. What subsidy per kg. should the government offer? If the plant abates to the socially efficient level of emissions, what total subsidy payment would the firm receive? Identify the area in your graph. How much better or worse off would the firm be compared to if it did no abating? Identify the area in your graph. What would be the net benefit to society if we pay the firm to reduce the plant’s emissions to the socially efficient level? Identify this area in your graph.
(12) Consider a market with social marginal benefit (quantity demanded) given by SMB = 600 – Q and private marginal cost (quantity supplied) given by PMC = Q. Social marginal cost is given by SMC = 200 + Q. Assume SMB = PMB. (a) Graph these SMB, SMC, and PMC curves. (b) Find the market equilibrium price and quantity. (c) Find the socially optimal equilibrium price and quantity.
You are an industry analyst that specializes in an industry where the market inverse demand is P = 300 - 4Q. The external marginal cost of producing the product is MCExternal = 8Q, and the internal cost is MCInternal = 15Q.Instructions: Enter your responses rounded to the nearest two decimal places.a. What is the socially efficient level of output? unitsb. Given these costs and market demand, how much output would a competitive industry produce? unitsc. Given these costs and market demand, how much output would a monopolist produce? unitsd. Which of the following are actions the government could take to induce firms in this industry to produce the socially efficient level of output.Instructions: In order to receive full credit, you must make a selection for each option. For correct answer(s), click the box once to place a check mark. For incorrect answer(s), click twice to empty the box.check all that apply Pollution taxes Nonrival consumption Pollution permits
In the market for a certain pesticide, the following equations represent the private demand and supply: Private Demand: QD = 160 - P Private Supply: QS = 4P The use of this pesticide has a negative externality that affects nearby ecosystems, which is not reflected in the market price. The external cost is estimated to be $5 per unit of pesticide. By how much is the pesticide overconsumed under perfect competition? A) 1 units B) 3 units C) 4 units D) 5 units E) none of the above
using an appropriate graph, show the effects of externalities on the private and social optimum prices and quantities. discuss briefly how could social optimum levels be achieved
Air horns impose many external costs on society: the risk of being deafened, the annoyance of being awakened in the middle of the night, and so on. Therefore, the market equilibrium quantity of air horns is not equal to the socially optimal quantity. The following graph shows the demand for air horns (their private value), the supply of air horns (the private cost of producing them), and the social cost of air horns, including both the private cost and external costs. Use the black point (plus symbol) to indicate the market equilibrium quantity. Next, use the purple point (diamond symbol) to indicate the socially optimal quantity.
Two MSU fraternities, Phi Kappa Sigma and Phi Kappa Tau, are accustomed to each having 6 parties a month. Phi Kappa Sigma and Phi Kappa Tau are located close to each other on Bogue Street. These parties impose a negative externality on their other neighbors on Bogue Street. Suppose President Stanley decides that the socially optimal total number of parties on Bogue Street is 8 parties a month. The total benefits each fraternity derives from having a certain number of parties a month are given in the table below. Number of Parties 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 Phi Kappa Sigma's Total Benefits 0 300 500 650 700 740 775 Phi Kappa Sigma's Marg. Benefits Phi Kappa Tau's Total Benefits 0 250 475 650 750 825 850 Phi Kappa Tau's Marg. Benefits a) Suppose President Stanley decides to limit the total number of parties to 8 by issuing Phi Kappa Sigma 6 rights and Phi Kappa Tau 2 rights. Each right allows the fraternity to have one party. If these rights are allowed to be traded, how many rights will be sold? Who…

SEE MORE QUESTIONS

Recommended textbooks for you

ENGR.ECONOMIC ANALYSIS

Economics

ISBN:

9780190931919

Author:

NEWNAN

Publisher:

Oxford University Press

Principles of Economics (12th Edition)

Economics

ISBN:

9780134078779

Author:

Karl E. Case, Ray C. Fair, Sharon E. Oster

Publisher:

PEARSON

Engineering Economy (17th Edition)

Economics

ISBN:

9780134870069

Author:

William G. Sullivan, Elin M. Wicks, C. Patrick Koelling

Publisher:

PEARSON

ENGR.ECONOMIC ANALYSIS

Economics

ISBN:

9780190931919

Author:

NEWNAN

Publisher:

Oxford University Press

Principles of Economics (12th Edition)

Economics

ISBN:

9780134078779

Author:

Karl E. Case, Ray C. Fair, Sharon E. Oster

Publisher:

PEARSON

Engineering Economy (17th Edition)

Economics

ISBN:

9780134870069

Author:

William G. Sullivan, Elin M. Wicks, C. Patrick Koelling

Publisher:

PEARSON

Principles of Economics (MindTap Course List)

Economics

ISBN:

9781305585126

Author:

N. Gregory Mankiw

Publisher:

Cengage Learning

Managerial Economics: A Problem Solving Approach

Economics

ISBN:

9781337106665

Author:

Luke M. Froeb, Brian T. McCann, Michael R. Ward, Mike Shor

Publisher:

Cengage Learning

Managerial Economics & Business Strategy (Mcgraw-…

Economics

ISBN:

9781259290619

Author:

Michael Baye, Jeff Prince

Publisher:

McGraw-Hill Education

SEE MORE TEXTBOOKS