Firms A and B each produce 80 units of pollution. The federal government wants to reduce pollution levels. The marginal costs associated with pollution reduction are MCA = 50 + 3QA for firm A and MCB = 20 + 6QB for firm B, where QA and QB are the quantities of pollution reduced by each firm. Society's marginal benefit from pollution reduction is given by MB = 590-3Qtot' where Qtot is the total reduction in pollution. The socially optimal level of firm A's pollution reduction is . Hint: Type integers. reduction is . The socially optimal level of firm B's pollution

Firms A and B each produce 80 units of pollution. The federal government wants to reduce pollution levels. The marginal costs associated with pollution reduction are MCA = 50 + 3QA for firm A and MCB = 20 + 6QB for firm B, where QA and QB are the quantities of pollution reduced by each firm. Society's marginal benefit from pollution reduction is given by MB = 590-3Qtot' where Qtot is the total reduction in pollution. The socially optimal level of firm A's pollution reduction is . Hint: Type integers. reduction is . The socially optimal level of firm B's pollution

ENGR.ECONOMIC ANALYSIS

14th Edition

ISBN:9780190931919

Author:NEWNAN

Publisher:NEWNAN

Chapter1: Making Economics Decisions

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 1QTC

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

Firms in a polluting industry can be classified in two groups: newer firms with a cleaner technology that can abate pollution at a lower marginal cost M CLA L = (1/2) aL and older firms with dirtier M CAH = aH , where ai is the level of abatement undertaken by firms of type i = L,H. The social marginal benefit of abating pollution from this particular industry is MBA = 120 - A, where A is the aggregate level of abatement in that industry: 1. What Pigouvian tax t will implement the efficient allocation (aL; aH )? Is the resulting allocation an efficient allocation? What is the government’s tax revenue? 2. Suppose that in order to avoid the costly obtention of disaggregate information about individual firms cost, the government just implements a uniform standard aui = A*/2. Is this allocation efficient? If not, what is the deadweight loss?
The table below shows the supply and demand conditions for a furniture factory that pollutes the air. The third column (Qs1) represents a supply curve without accounting for the social cost of pollution. The fourth column (Qs2) represents the supply curve when the firm is required to account for the social cost of pollution. Price QD Qs1 Qs2 $10 450 400 250 $15 440 440 290 $25 430 480 330 $30 420 520 370 $35 410 560 410 Answer the following: a) What is the negative externality in this situation? b) Identify the equilibrium price and equilibrium quantity when we account only for private costs. c) Identify the equilibrium price and equilibrium quantity when we account for the social costs. d) How does accounting for the externality affect the equilibrium price and quantity? JUSTIFY your answer!
ayor Grinch imposes a $1 tax on each bottle of Zlurp. Consumption per person is now bottles. This yields a per-person consumer surplus of not including the cost of pollution, a per-person external cost of , and government revenue of per person. Total surplus per person is now as a result of this policy. (Hint: Total surplus is equal to consumer surplus minus the external cost of pollution plus government revenue.) Based on your calculations, you support the mayor's policy because it welfare compared to before the tax.
None
8.1 Suppose we have an agricultural valley 100 km by 50 km, with a polluting electricity power plant. The power plant causes pollution problems in a narrow strip of land downwind of the plant, and within this valley. 10 km in length and 500 m in width, but no problems outside of that area. The total effect of the pollution is to make crop land less productive. If we were to clean up the pollution, would we expect land prices to increase? Where? Would we expect wages to decline? Would the changes in land prices and/or wages fully reflect the benefits of cleaning up the pollution? Why or why not?
There are three major ferry lines operating in Vancouver, each generating 100 units of pollution per year. The ferry lines face the costs of reducing pollution that are shown in the table below. Ferry line Cost of reducing pollution by 1 unit A $1,200 B $2,400 C $1,600 a. The BC government has decided it wants to reduce pollution levels by 50 percent and requires each ferry line to cut its pollution in half. Determine the cost of pollution reduction for each ferry line.Instructions: Round your answers to the nearest dollar. Ferry line Cost of pollution reduction A $ B $ C $ a. The total cost of pollution reduction is $ .b. Suppose the government decides to give each ferry line 50 tradable permits. Each permit allows a ferry line to produce one unit of pollution. Ferry line ____ will buy permits from ferry line ____.c. Under this system of tradable permits, the total cost of pollution reduction is $ .
The figure below shows the marginal benefit (demand) of polluting for two firms: Alpha and Beta. Before the introduction of a pollution tax, pollution is free, that is, MC = $0 per ton of emissions. Marginal Benefit (MB) to Firm Tax = $100 0 MB BETA MBALPHA 25 50 75 100 Emissions (tons) The government decides to impose a tax on pollution of $100 per ton of emissions. That is, the per-unit the tax is the marginal cost of polluting. Which of the follow are true? (Select all that are true.) a. As a result of the tax, the total emissions will decrease by 50 units b. The tax was intended to decrease production by 50 units for each firm. c. As a result of the tax, both firms will decrease emissions by the same amount d. After the tax is imposed, Firm Beta will emit 50 tons more pollution than Firm Alpha e. Before the tax is imposed, Firm Beta emitted more pollution than Firm Alpha f. As a result of the tax, total emissions from the two firms will be cut in half g. The amount of tax collected…
Im confused on this question.
A T, C Pollution The above graph illustrates the marginal pollution cost per ton of goods that a firm produces. Assume the firm currently has no regulation and will produce at the point Qmax. Suppose a pollution tax per ton is placed on the firm (T1). What area represents the tax paid by the firm? C only A+B A+B+C
Problem 5 refers to the following setup: The demand curve in a market is Q = 6-P. Firm A and B are the only sellers, their marginal costs are constant at 2 and 3 respectively, and there is no fixed cost. They produce identical goods. 5. a) What is the socially efficient outcome? (Specify the quantity for each firm.) b) Find the quantity produced by each firm and the price under Cournot competition. c) What is each firm's profit under Cournot competition?
The Coase Theorem says that if people negotiate the right perform activities that cause externalities, they can always arrive at efficient solutions to problems caused by externalities. Use an example to explain why the people that are harmed are willing to pay to stop pollution.
This is an end-of-chapter problem that I'm struggling with! thanks!