8.3 After conducting her analysis of housing prices in Novosibersk, Oxana notes that every-one in her study has exactly the same income, graduated from the same school, and listensto the same music; in fact, everyone in town appears to have exactly the same tastes andincome. Does Oxana have enough information to construct a typical marginal willingness-to-pay function for pollution in Novosibersk? Why?

Oxana does not have enough information to construct a typical marginal willingness-to-pay (WTP)…

Answered: 8.3 After conducting her analysis of…

Economics (MindTap Course List)

13th Edition

ISBN:9781337617383

Author:Roger A. Arnold

Publisher:Roger A. Arnold

Chapter30: Market Failure: Externalities, Public Goods, And Asymmetric Information

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 3WNG

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

Economists define the efficient amount of fund pollutants as the amount that minimizes the sum of damage and control costs. Using this definition, they derive two general rules, one of which is that the efficient level of pollution is not generally zero. Briefly explain why this is true.
There are three identical firms in Happy Valley. Firms Initial Pollution Level Cost of Reducing Pollution by 1 unit A 30 units $20 B 40 units $30 C 20 units $10 The government wants to reduce total pollution to 60 units, so it gives each firm 20 tradable permits. Who sells permits and how many do they sell? Who buys permits and how many do they buy? Briefly explain why the sellers and buyers are each willing to do so? What is the total cost of pollution reduction in this situation? How much larger would the cost of pollution reduction be if the permits could not be traded?
Economists Kenneth Chay and Michael Greenstone found that in the two years following the passage of the Clean Air Act of 1970, the sharp reduction in air pollution also led to a decline in infant deaths. Although this and other studies provide compelling evidence of the link between pollution and infant health, it is not clear that reductions from the much lower levels of ambient pollution today would have the same effect. Which of the following reasons could explain this? A. Today, the level of pollution is much higher. Therefore, it will take a much larger reduction in air pollution to reap benefits similar to those in 1970. B. When levels of pollution are high, the marginal benefit of reducing pollution also is high. It follows therefore that the benefit of reducing air pollution in 1970 would be much higher than the benefit from a proportional reduction in air pollution today when the level of pollution is much lower. C. When levels of pollution are…
Marginal Abatement Costs: The marginal abatement costs of three firms are provided in the table below on page 109. Each firm is emitting now 10 tons/week. Therefore, the total emission of all firms is 30 tons/week. Suppose that society wants to reduce the level of emission by 50%, to 15 tons/week. Calculate the total cost of reducing the level of emission to 15 tons/week Assuming equiproportionate decrease in emissions which of the following is correct: 69 96 100 Assuming equimarginal decrease in emissions which of the following is correct: 69 96 100
Air pollution creates a negative externality—a cost suffered by a third party as a result of an economic transaction. A standard solution to a negative externality is a Pigouvian tax, a tax that raises the marginal private cost of pollution emissions to the level of the marginal social cost. The socially optimal quantity of pollution emissions is then determined by the intersection of the marginal private benefit, or demand, curve and the marginal social cost curve. The article notes that "putting a dollar value on the benefits of cleaner air has been difficult." Assuming this problem has been resolved, in the accompanying diagram, move the endpoints of line Smarginal social cost to show the marginal social cost curve. Then move the line labeled "Tax" to show the amount of the tax needed to limit emissions to the socially optimal level.
Briefly explain the relevance of the first theorem of welfare economics in the field of environmental economics.
What are pollution havens? How are they created or why do they exist? Why do economists think they may change over time and develop policies to reduce pollution?
Efficiency in the presence of externalities Air horns impose many external costs on society: the risk of being deafened, the annoyance of being awakened in the middle of the night, and so on. Therefore, the market equilibrium quantity of air horns is not equal to the socially optimal quantity. The following graph shows the demand for air horns (their private value), the supply of air horns (the private cost of producing them), and the social cost of air horns, including both the private cost and external costs. Use the black point (plus symbol) to indicate the market equilibrium quantity. Next, use the purple point (diamond symbol) to indicate the socially optimal quantity.
This is an end-of-chapter problem that I'm struggling with! thanks!
Paper factories emit chemicals as a waste product. This generates a cost to society that is not paid for by the firm; therefore, pollution is a negative externality of paper production. Suppose the U.S. government wants to correct this market failure by getting firms to internalize the cost of pollution. To do this, the government can charge firms for pollution rights (the right to emit a given quantity of chemicals). The following graph shows the daily demand for pollution rights. Use the graph input tool to help you answer the following questions. You will not be graded on any changes you make to this graph. Note: Once you enter a value in a white field, the graph and any corresponding amounts in each grey field will change accordingly. Graph Input Tool 80 Daily Demand for Pollution Rights 72 I Price (Dollars per ton) 8 64 Quantity Demanded 360 56 (Millions of tons) 48 40 32 24 Demand 16 8 40 80 120 160 200 240 280 320 360 400 QUANTITY (Millions of tons) Suppose the government has…
It’s common to think that reducing pollution is necessarily costly because to reduce pollution we need to tax firms who will then produce less. But can you think of one example in which pollution might not only be unpleasant but might actually reduce production?
What are the costs of pollution according to the Lancet Commission on pollution and health? Why are those numbers likely to be an underestimate? Explain.

SEE MORE QUESTIONS

Recommended textbooks for you

Economics (MindTap Course List)

Economics

ISBN:

9781337617383

Author:

Roger A. Arnold

Publisher:

Cengage Learning

Microeconomics

Economics

ISBN:

9781337617406

Author:

Roger A. Arnold

Publisher:

Cengage Learning

Micro Economics For Today

Economics

ISBN:

9781337613064

Author:

Tucker, Irvin B.

Publisher:

Cengage,

Economics (MindTap Course List)

Economics

ISBN:

9781337617383

Author:

Roger A. Arnold

Publisher:

Cengage Learning

Microeconomics

Economics

ISBN:

9781337617406

Author:

Roger A. Arnold

Publisher:

Cengage Learning

Micro Economics For Today

Economics

ISBN:

9781337613064

Author:

Tucker, Irvin B.

Publisher:

Cengage,

Economics For Today

Economics

ISBN:

9781337613040

Author:

Tucker

Publisher:

Cengage Learning

SEE MORE TEXTBOOKS