LPU• Effective April 21, 2014, Philip Luis F. Marin (Marin, for short) was appointed Reservations Officer ofCathay Pacific Airways Ltd (Cathay) for a probationary period of six months. A letter dated March 23,2014 was given to him specifying his appointment wherein he is to receive a monthly salary includingholidays and rest days, with a promise of a salary review upon satisfactory completion of theprobationary period. The letter also stated that Cathay reserved the right to terminate (Marin) servicesduring the probationary period if performance proves to be unsatisfactory, in which case will receivethe salary due at the time of the termination of his services. Mr. Marin accepted those terms ofemployment and that he would be reconfirmed as a member of regular staff upon completion of theprobationary period. Mr. Marin was briefed and counseled by virtue of a Memorandum which wasreleased by M.A. Canizares (Administrative Supervisor) dated October 15, 2013. It was noted that Mr.Marin was not furnished with the set of regulations of Cathay and copies of his assessment. However,Marin admitted that he was briefed by Senior Supervisor Nenitha Montallana on April 28, 2014 on therules regarding phone calls, breaktime and others. Marin also admitted that he received from Cathaycopies of document to be used to evaluate his performance. There were occasions that Marin wasbriefed on his unsatisfactory performance assessment on July 23, 2014.Finally on September 21, 2014,Marin was briefed on his performance assessment and Cathay 's decision not to regularize hisemployment upon expiry of the probationary period. Marin was finally informed of the termination ofhis services in a letter dated October 2, 2014.• Is the decision of Cathay not to regularize Marin's employment upon the expiration of theprobationary period valid considering that Marin was not furnished copies of the set of regulations ofCathay, as well as his assessment reports?

Yes, Cathay's decision not to regularize Marin's employment upon the of the Probationary period is…

Answered: Cathay Pacific Airways Ltd (Cathay) for…

Understanding Business

12th Edition

ISBN:9781259929434

Author:William Nickels

Publisher:William Nickels

Chapter1: Taking Risks And Making Profits Within The Dynamic Business Environment

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 1CE

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

Dowdy Soil Service agrees to test and excavate a growing field for Bundren Plant Emporium. When Dowdy runs into the types of difficulties that contractors ordinarily confront, Bundren agrees to pay extra compensation to overcome them. Regarding the agreement to pay more, a court would likely Onot get involved. Oorder the parties to renegotiate it. O not enforce it. enforce it.
Subject - account Please help me. Thankyou.
Business Case Problem with Sample Answer—Determining Employee Status. Nelson Ovalles workedas a cable installer for Cox Rhode Island Telecom,LLC, under an agreement with a third party,M&M Communications, Inc. the agreementstated that no employer-employee relationshipexisted between Cox and M&M’s technicians, includingOvalles. Ovalles was required to designate his aliation withCox on his work van, clothing, and identication badge. Coxhad minimal contact with him, however, and had limitedpower to control how he performed his duties. Cox suppliedcable wire and similar items, but the equipment was delivered to M&M, not to Ovalles. On a workday, while Ovalleswas fullling a work order, his van rear-ended a car driven byBarbara Cayer. Is Cox liable to Cayer? Explain. [Cayer v. CoxRhode Island Telecom, LLC, 85 A.3d 1140 (R.I. 2014)] (SeeAgency Law.)
Ma3. Explain in brief. Sally Henderson is an employee of Good Eats Restaurant. Sally's contract with Good Eats Restaurant states: "Sally Henderson shall ensure the bathrooms and dining room area are reasonably clean during operating hours." Sally's good friend James is also employed by Good Eats Restaurant as a parking attendant, a person who parks customers’ cars. On a very busy night at Good Eats Restaurant, without the authorization of Good Eats Restaurant, Sally decided to help her friend James park cars. Sally injures a customer due to Sally's negligent driving while parking cars. The injured customer sues Sally and Good Eats Restaurant. Is it likely that Good Eats Restaurant will be determined to be liable to the injured customer. BRIEFLY EXPLAIN.
Answer the following TRUE/FALSE questions:Redundancy is a form of dismissal The Data Protection Act 2018 applies to computer-based and electronically stored information systems onlyAn employee has a statutory right not to be unfairly dismissed under the Employment Rights Act 1996Common Law imposes a duty on an employer not to pass confidential information to a third party about his employeeA wrongful dismissal will occur by a breach of the employment contractUnder the Data Protection Act 2018, a claim for damages for distress can be made for data breachBiometric and genetic data, are covered under the GDPR 2016
Francine posts on social media that she will pay $500 to anyone who will clear her lawn of leaves. One of Francine's friends is dating Bob, who goes out and collects all the leaves. When he asks for payment, Francine says that the two never had a contract. Is Francine correct? Briefly explain.
A bargaining representative election was held in Smith Electronic Company against the will of the employer. The employer threatened to terminate those employees who cast their vote during representative election. In this situation, the employer has violated: administrative regulations. the contract bar rule. the silent period. the forty-eight-hour rule.
14. A contracts with B to mow his lawn and rake up fallen leaves. If A and B agree that B will fertilize his flowers instead of raking to satisfy B's contractual obligations; this is called: a) a Novation. b) an Accord. c) mitigating damages. d) substantial performance.
19-2. Specific Performance. In which of the following situations would specific performance be an appropriate remedy? Discuss fully. (See Equitable Remedies.) a. Thompson contracts to sell her house and lot to Cousteau. Then, on finding another buyer willing to pay a higher purchase price, she refuses to deed the property to Cousteau. b. Amy contracts to sing and dance in Fred's nightclub for one month, beginning May 1. She then refuses to perform. C. Hoffman contracts to purchase a rare coin owned by Erikson, who is breaking up his coin collection. At the last minute, Erikson decides to keep his coin collection intact and refuses to deliver the coin to Hoffman. d. ABC Corp. has three shareholders: Panozzo, who owns 48 percent of the stock; Chang, who owns another 48 percent; and Ryan, who owns 4 percent. Ryan contracts to sell her 4 percent to Chang. Later, Ryan refuses to transfer the shares to Chang.
Clay and Roan are negotiating the sale of Clay's car to Roan. Roan tells Clay he needs a little time to consider the last offer Clay made. A week later, Roan emails Clay, "I accept your offer." Clay and Roan a. have a valid contract because Clay did not specify the method of acceptance and accepting via email a week later is reasonable. b. do not have a valid contract because accepting a week later is an unreasonable lapse of time. c. do not have a valid contract because accepting via email is an unreasonable manner of acceptance. d. have a valid contract because they were in the middle of negotiations.
Presume the employee does not get the promised 11% pay raise, and a grievance is filed. What type of grievance is it likely to be? Explain.
Business Scenarios and Case Problems 18-1. Conditions of Performance. The Caplans contract with Faithful Construction, Inc., to build a house for them for $360,000. The specifications state "all plumbing bowls and fixtures... to be Crane brand." The Caplans leave on vacation, and during their absence, Faithful is unable to buy and install Crane plumbing fixtures. Instead, Faithful installs Kohler brand fixtures, an equivalent in the industry. On completion of the building contract, the Caplans inspect the work, discover the substitution, and refuse to accept the house, claiming Faithful has breached the conditions set forth in the specifications. Discuss fully the Caplans' claim. (See Conditions.)

SEE MORE QUESTIONS

Recommended textbooks for you

Understanding Business

Management

ISBN:

9781259929434

Author:

William Nickels

Publisher:

McGraw-Hill Education

Management (14th Edition)

Management

ISBN:

9780134527604

Author:

Stephen P. Robbins, Mary A. Coulter

Publisher:

PEARSON

Spreadsheet Modeling & Decision Analysis: A Pract…

Management

ISBN:

9781305947412

Author:

Cliff Ragsdale

Publisher:

Cengage Learning

Understanding Business

Management

ISBN:

9781259929434

Author:

William Nickels

Publisher:

McGraw-Hill Education

Management (14th Edition)

Management

ISBN:

9780134527604

Author:

Stephen P. Robbins, Mary A. Coulter

Publisher:

PEARSON

Spreadsheet Modeling & Decision Analysis: A Pract…

Management

ISBN:

9781305947412

Author:

Cliff Ragsdale

Publisher:

Cengage Learning

Management Information Systems: Managing The Digi…

Management

ISBN:

9780135191798

Author:

Kenneth C. Laudon, Jane P. Laudon

Publisher:

PEARSON

Business Essentials (12th Edition) (What's New in…

Management

ISBN:

9780134728391

Author:

Ronald J. Ebert, Ricky W. Griffin

Publisher:

PEARSON

Fundamentals of Management (10th Edition)

Management

ISBN:

9780134237473

Author:

Stephen P. Robbins, Mary A. Coulter, David A. De Cenzo

Publisher:

PEARSON

SEE MORE TEXTBOOKS