Modiqua was employed by the 4th Element (Pty) Ltd until he was dismissed for makinga disclosure to the Department of Employment and Labour about the employer'spattern of non-compliance with the occupational health and safety protocols.ANSWER THE FOLLOWING QUESTIONS WITH REFERENCE TO THE RELEVANTAUTHORITY:(i)(ii)Discuss the lawfulness of the respective conducts of Modiqua (disclosure)and employer (dismissal).Employers are expected to take a 'reasonably practicable' standard of caretowards ensuring the health and safety of employees. That is, the duty toensure health and safety is not absolute. Explain how the concept"reasonably practicable' standard is determined in each situation.(iii)One of the common law duties of the employee is to obey all the reasonableinstructions of the employer. The OHSA, however, provides protection for'disobedient' employees under certain circumstances. List thosecircumstances.

Answered: Modiqua was employed by the 4th Element…

Similar questions

In terms of employment law, discuss the following: a) How a contract of employment can be terminated. b) Refer to the different types of dismissal and what remedies may be available to the employee.
n employee was terminated for smoking in a no smoking area. The union claimed that he should be reinstated because the company failed to follow due rocess procedures. When the company and the union could not agree, this case was referred to arbitration and the arbitrator ruled in favor of the employee. How should the company respond? our Response The company should reinstate the employee and follow due process in the future. The company should appeal the case to the district court. The company should request a hearing by a three-member panel of administrative law judges. The company should appeal the case to the NLRB. Feedback
The Case of Baylor University Patty Crawford, the Title IX coordinator at Baylor from November 2014 to October 2016, was hired to coordinate the institution’s Title IX compliance when this case took place (Baylor University, n.d.). Like all Title IX coordinators, Crawford’s role was a comprehensive administrative role that bears the responsibility of ensuring that campuses prevent and respond to gender discrimination, including sexual misconduct. This role spans duties related to grievance process management, victim assistance, organization management, and climate management (Lake, 2017). In addition to managing the institution’s compliance, Title IX coordinators also craft comprehensive training and awareness strategies to ensure students, employees, and other campus stakeholders are aware of how to identify and report sexual misconduct and what resources are available to students regardless of whether they choose to proceed with the grievance process. Crawford alleged that she was…
Answer the following TRUE/FALSE questions:Redundancy is a form of dismissal The Data Protection Act 2018 applies to computer-based and electronically stored information systems onlyAn employee has a statutory right not to be unfairly dismissed under the Employment Rights Act 1996Common Law imposes a duty on an employer not to pass confidential information to a third party about his employeeA wrongful dismissal will occur by a breach of the employment contractUnder the Data Protection Act 2018, a claim for damages for distress can be made for data breachBiometric and genetic data, are covered under the GDPR 2016
Post to “The California “Home Protection Bill of Rights” presumes that a person using deadly force on an intruder acted in reasonable fear of death or great bodily harm to himself or herself or a member of the household. Do you agree or disagree with such a presumption? Does the castle doctrine encourage gun ownership?”
Which of the following are required for a plaintiff to establish a prima facie case of disability discrimination? Select all that apply. 1. that her employer has 10 or more full time employees 2. that she was forced to work in a hostile work environment. 3. that she is someone who, with or without reasonable accommodation, can perform the “essential functions” of the employment position that such individual holds or desires. 4. that she is disabled 5. that she was subjected to unlawful discrimination because of her disability
A bargaining representative election was held in Smith Electronic Company against the will of the employer. The employer threatened to terminate those employees who cast their vote during representative election. In this situation, the employer has violated: administrative regulations. the contract bar rule. the silent period. the forty-eight-hour rule.
Briefly explain dismissal and the grounds for dismissal according to canadian law. Can you think of any relevant Canadian case law?
Ordinarily, an inquiry into or regarding occupational health and safety incidents breaches is a formal, public proceeding presided over by an inspector or the chief inspector. However, the presiding officer has the right to remove anyone whose presence he/she deems undesirable or against public interest. (i) Who are the persons with interest and therefore illegible to be present in the inquiry? (ii) An employer and a majority trade union have entered into a collective agreement which exempts an employer for the occupational health and safety breaches. Discuss the lawfulness of this agreement. (iii) Define the term 'major incident'. €€ (iv) Distinguish between a 'mine not being worked' and a 'mine being worked'.
evaluate the benefits of the introduction of the Consumer Right Act 2015, Trade description Act of 1968, The Supply of Goods and Services Act of 1982, Consumer Protection Act of 1987 and General Product Safety Regulations of 1994. describe laws relating to employment, in particular with regard to Employment Relations Act 2004 and what these legislations means with regards to termination of employment Justify the importance of acting in accordance with consumer safety laws. Determine the nature, constitution and structure of a company. Assess how employment laws contribute to termination of contracts. PLEASE ANSWER ABOVE QUESTIONS FOR ME
The employment-at-will doctrine O does not permit employers to fire employees unless they give them advance notice. O has been abolished in most U.S. states. O exists in some form in every U.S. jurisdiction. O applies in cases where an employee has an implied contract.
Corey, who works as a mechanic, falls off a ladder, breaks his arm, and loses consciousness. Upon returning to the company post-treatment, the company transfers him to a different position. Does the company need to make a report under the Occupational Safety and Health Act (OSHA)? If yes, what are the details to be included in the report? Explain.

SEE MORE QUESTIONS