“The California “Home Protection Bill of Rights” presumes that a person using deadly force on an intruder acted in reasonable fear of death or great bodily harm to himself or herself or a member of the household. Do you agree or disagree with such a presumption? Does the castle doctrine encourage gun ownership?”
Q: use IRAC A merchant ordered a shipment of leather overseas. As a result of the pandemic, the owner…
A: The issue here is whether the owner of the vessel has the right to sell the goods (leather) that he…
Q: The general rule is that there is no duty to rescue another, absent a special relationship. Was the…
A: The question pertains to the imposition of a duty on a psychologist to a third party and the…
Q: In which case did the Supreme Court hold that the right to trial by jury for serious offenses was a…
A: In 1968, the Supreme Court issued its historic decision in Duncan v. Louisiana. In a 7-2 vote, the…
Q: Write response to: A 70-year-old, 100-pound woman becomes angry at a 25-year-old, 200-pound man and…
A: Self-defense refers to the act of protecting oneself from further harm or violence by using an…
Q: To what extent should business entities, such as corporations, be entitled to assert the Fifth…
A: Self-incrimination is the intentional or unintentional act of disclosing facts that may expose…
Q: Title VII of The Civil Rights Act of 1964 makes illegal to discriminate against someone based on…
A: It is a law, that prohibits employment discrimination based on particular protected acts. It is one…
Q: Catherine Bosley worked as a television news anchor for WKBN Channel 27 in Youngstown, Ohio. While…
A: THE ANSWER IS AS BELOW:
Q: Use Australian Legislation to answer this please, thank you. Maria is a sixteen-year-old who has a…
A: The provided case presents a scenario involving several legal issues that require examination and…
Q: 3. What protection under human rights law does an individual have who has been denied employment…
A: Human rights law comprises various provisions that deal with certain rules and rights for employees…
Q: Part 3 – 5 of the Australian Consumer Law (ACL) provides a different approach to that of the common…
A: A statutory cause of action is stated under the Australian Consumer Law (ACL) for personal injuries…
Q: Show how the right to freedom of speech might be in conflict with the ownership of a trademark. How…
A: A trademark is a distinctive symbol, word, phrase, design, or combination used to represent and…
Q: ection 15 of the Driving Act 2019 (Qld) states that 'Persons shall not engage in dangerous driving…
A: Motor vehicle amendment act introduced in July 15 of 2019. This act grant permission of license,…
Q: In Snyder V. Phelps, the Supreme Court held the first amendment shields Westboro from any tort…
A: Tort liability is the legal requirement or responsibility of a person or organization to compensate…
Q: Argue that piercing the corporate veil is a moral rule as well as a legal rule.
A: The objective of the question is to argue that piercing the corporate veil is not only a legal rule…
Q: Explain what you believe are the appropriate boundaries for the responsibilities that employees have…
A: INTRODUCTION: Creating an ethical workplace has several benefits. One advantage is that it might…
Q: If a paralegal in Texas were accused of engaging in UPL, what would the possible consequences be,…
A: If a paralegal was accused in engaging in UPL, he might have to face the following consequences
Q: The United States Supreme Court has ruled that it violates the Eighth Amendment for a juvenile…
A: Note: The solution is provided in a generalized way. The United States Constitution's Eighth…
Q: Was Gibb's use of portions of copyrighted songs in his own music illegal? Explain.
A: Internet law: It means the law associated with information technology and the internet. It is also…
Q: Will the public policy exception to the employment-at-will doctrine expand to fill gaps in public…
A: Introduction: The public policy exception to the employment-at-will doctrine is a legal principle…
Q: Explain Justice Clark’s argument that imposing a legal duty to warn on psychiatrists would result in…
A: Justice Clark's argument regarding imposing a legal duty to warn on psychiatrists is rooted in…
Q: Indian Coffee Company, a coffee roaster in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, sold its Breakfast Cheer coffee…
A: The Robinson-Patman Act is a federal law that prohibits sellers from discriminating in price between…
Q: French survivors of the Holocaust sued Yahoo USA because French citizens were purchasing Nazi…
A: If I had been the US judge I would have ruled similarly.
Q: Capune was attempting a trip from New York to Florida on an eighteen-foot-long paddleboard. The trip…
A: Assault means doing a physical attack on a person.
Q: Freddie is driving his motorcycle in a state in which helmet use is required by statute. Freddie is…
A: Despite the obvious safety advantages, it is unfortunate that some motorcycle riders choose not to…
Q: .A retired businessman who owned a track of land was approached by a real estate agent, who is…
A: Note: As per bartleby guidelines in case multiple questions are asked by the students then the…
Q: Megan’s Law provides that all states are now required to have all convicted sex offenders register…
A: Case summary: The case discuss the Megan law which made the data related to former sex offenders…
Q: Based on the Taco Bell case (1982), how would the courts determine misleading or deceptive conduct?
A: The Taco Bell case from 1982 is a pivotal example of how courts determine whether conduct is…
Q: How can a company reduce the possibility that its employees may engage in unlawful activity?…
A: An unlawful activity can be through actions, words (spoken or written), signs or visible…
Q: What is the Criminal Court of the City of New York
A: Courts have the supreme power and decide on matters what really transpired and what must be done…
Q: ADMINISTRATIVE LAW The University Statutes allows the promulgation of rules relating to highway…
A: Administrative agencies, which are governmental entities having the power to administer and enforce…
Q: a 45 year old patient was under doctor care for the past twenty years for chronic arthritis, trying…
A: The objective of the question is to discuss the issues of manufacturer's liability and negligence in…
Q: At approximately 4:00 A.M. on July 14, 2000, a woman wearing a mask and pointing a firearm demanded…
A: The public policy exception to employment at will is a legal doctrine that protects employees from…
Q: Outline the key factors that determines fair use of
A: The key factors that determines fair use of copyrighted text under US law are discussed as follows-
Q: Which of the following Equal Employment Opportunity Legislations places the burden of proof on the…
A: Here, all the acts that are given in the question, these could include Equal employment opportunity…
Post to “The California “Home Protection Bill of Rights” presumes that a person using deadly force on an intruder acted in reasonable fear of death or great bodily harm to himself or herself or a member of the household. Do you agree or disagree with such a presumption? Does the castle doctrine encourage gun ownership?”
Trending now
This is a popular solution!
Step by step
Solved in 3 steps
- Written defamation is called "slander."A transit officer sees a 2-year-old child walking along the edge of a train station by herself. The officer realizes that it looks strange and dangerous that she is walking very close to the edge. While the child is standing next to the officer she prepares to jump onto the tracks. The officer could have could have grabbed her and pulled her back onto the platform, but he chose not to do so. Unfortunately, the child gets hit by a train and dies. The parents, were nearby and didn’t notice that their child walked away from them, sue the officer and the city for damages. What is the probable outcome of their suit? What if it wasn’t an officer but just another rider on the subway?Courtney lived in Wyoming. On New Year’s Day she purchased a weight loss drug manufactured in Oklahoma by an Oklahoma Corporation, Ozzipic, Inc. Courtney learned of the drug from multiple advertisements on her local television station and in local newspapers. After suffering from a serious gastrointestinal illness, she sued Ozzipic in a Wyoming state court for $100,000. Ozzipic argued that Wyoming did not have personal jurisdiction over them because they were an Oklahoma corporation. How should the court rule? a. Wyoming does not have personal jurisdiction over the Oklahoma defendants because an advertisement in a local paper does not amount to minimum contacts. b. This case should be transferred to Federal Court based on Diversity Jurisdiction, as the plaintiff and defendant are from two different states and the plaintiff is seeking more than $75,000 in damages. c. Wyoming has personal jurisdiction over the Oklahoma defendants because they made one sale in…
- Can legal gambling have any harmful effects? Describe a form of legal gambling that takes place and some of its harmful effects. If it is harmful why is it allowed in the first place? Is there a way to mitigate these harmful effects?which of the following is considered an Unfair Trade Practice under Florida law? A) Abandonment B) Coercion C) Consequential Damage D) WaiverJimmyCorps places several Facebook ads claiming that his magic tonic protects consumers from coronavirus. Harvey places an order for 50 gallons of the magic tonic to protect himself and his family. Meanwhile, the New York Attorney General commences prosecution of JimmyCorps for fraud—his magic tonic is simply a gallon of bleach, and consumers who have purchased it have become gravely ill or died. Still, JimmyCorps sues Harvey when Harvey refuses to pay for the 50 gallons of tonic he ordered. Can a judge force Harvey to pay JimmyCorps? Why or why not? Note:- Do not provide handwritten solution. Maintain accuracy and quality in your answer. Take care of plagiarism. Answer completely. You will get up vote for sure.
- Charter of Rights and Freedoms In 1988, the federal government introduced a legislation, Tobacco Products Control Act, created in complete and total prohibition on all advertising and promotion of tobacco products in Canada. The act also required a health warning of a specific nature to be put on tobacco packaging and prohibited the manufacturers from putting any other information on those packages. The manufacturer challenged the legislation before the Supreme Court claiming that it interfered with the manufacturer’s right to freedom of expression section 2 (b) of the Charter of Rights and Freedoms. 1) Do Supreme Court has legal right to interpret the legislated law? 2) Does law infringe the freedom of expression of the charter? Please state your reasons.The State of Florida has passed a statute nullifying any marriage that has previously been recognized, as well as outlawing any future marriages, for anyone who did not attend college. The statute gives no notice to any married couple and gives them no ability to challenge the statue. This statute has been challenged as unconstitutional by a group of married individuals as well as marriage equality groups. The groups have filed a Writ of Certiorari with the Supreme Court of the United States, which was granted. You are a law clerk for one of the nine Supreme Court Justices. Your task is to outline what arguments might be filed in a brief filed by both sides of this issue, so your Justice will be prepared for the arguments made by either side. Please include arguments for those supporting and those opposing the law. These arguments should focus on: 1. The Equal Protection clause and the Due Process Clause (what analysis will a court perform to decide if there is a violation of these…You are President and CEO of Apex Business Systems, Inc. (Apex). Apex, through its purchasing agent, bought a new microwave from Inki Appliances Company (Inki) who sells microwaves on a daily basis. There was no written or oral warranty given when the sale was made. The microwave stopped working one week after it was placed it in the company kitchen. Assume also that nobody misused the microwave or in any way caused it to quit working. The purchasing agent returned the microwave three days after it quit working. The owner of Inki refused to repair or replace the microwave or offer a refund. Prepare a demand letter to be sent to Inki.
- The U.S Supreme Court requires that any condemned property must be put into use for the general public. True Falsethe major federal legislation in Canada that defines illegal practices, including price fixing, bid rigging, price discrimination, predatory pricing, double ticketing, resale price maintenance, bait and switch selling, and pyramid selling occurs when false or deceptive comparisons or distorted claims are made concerning a competitor's product, services, or property comprise principle and standards that guide behaviour in the world of business may be incurred when an unfair and untrue statement is made about a competitor in writing the statement becomes actionable when it is communicated to a third party and can be interpreted as damaging the company the foundation for partnering-style relationship, product, customer, and presentation strategies an attempt to influence the person receiving the "gift"prohibits joining a competing firm for a year after they leave mutual exchange of benefits, as when a firm buys products from its customer the buyer wants to do business with an institution…CES The voluntary recitation of a prayer by children in public schools at the beginning of each day has been held unconstitutional by the Supreme Court. True False