Based on the events detailed in Margaret MacMillan’s book, Paris 1919: Six Months that Changed the World, make a convincing case either for or against having Paris as the location for the Peace conference that concluded World War I. In your opinion, would a more neutral site—for example a major city in North

icon
Related questions
Question

Based on the events detailed in Margaret MacMillan’s book, Paris 1919: Six Months that Changed the World, make a convincing case either for or against having Paris as the location for the Peace conference that concluded World War I. In your opinion, would a more neutral site—for example a major city in North America or Asia—have altered the eventual treaty in any significant way? Why or why not?

Expert Solution
trending now

Trending now

This is a popular solution!

steps

Step by step

Solved in 3 steps

Blurred answer