Based on the events detailed in Margaret MacMillan’s book, Paris 1919: Six Months that Changed the World, make a convincing case either for or against having Paris as the location for the Peace conference that concluded World War I. In your opinion, would a more neutral site—for example a major city in North
Based on the events detailed in Margaret MacMillan’s book, Paris 1919: Six Months that Changed the World, make a convincing case either for or against having Paris as the location for the Peace conference that concluded World War I. In your opinion, would a more neutral site—for example a major city in North
Related questions
Question
Based on the events detailed in Margaret MacMillan’s book, Paris 1919: Six Months that Changed the World, make a convincing case either for or against having Paris as the location for the Peace conference that concluded World War I. In your opinion, would a more neutral site—for example a major city in North America or Asia—have altered the eventual treaty in any significant way? Why or why not?
Expert Solution
This question has been solved!
Explore an expertly crafted, step-by-step solution for a thorough understanding of key concepts.
This is a popular solution!
Trending now
This is a popular solution!
Step by step
Solved in 3 steps
