Select all that apply.A customer brought a bottle of wine to have with their dinner at a BYOW (Bring Your Own Wine) restaurant, but drank only half. Under whatconditions can the restaurant allow the customer to remove the remaining wine from the premises?The bottle is resealed by the restaurant with a cork, flush with the top of the bottle.The wine is homemade.The restaurant cannot allow the remaining wine to be removed from the premises.The customer is not intoxicated.SUBMITENG451 PMSADO

The correct answers are:The bottle is resealed by the restaurant with a cork, flush with the top of…

Answered: apply. A customer brought a bottle of…

Similar questions

It's the annual office picnic, and Nicole has arrived late. She is supposed to be running one of the large grills. She rushes to the grill and uses an immense amount of lighter fluid, thinking it will get the grill hot in a shorter period of time. She doesn't realize that the lighter fluid can has several leaks, and when she lights the grill, fire shoots from the grill and catches her clothing on fire, causing severe burns. What, if any, cause of action can Nicole bring? What defenses can be raised?
need help asap
Quality Management Project Model -1 An industrial company that produces a.1 large number of different home appliances. The previous period suffers from a lot of customer complaints about its products, which caused many losses to the company from sales returns, as well as maintenance expenses and replacement of spare parts during the warranty period, as well as a lack .of sales of some types of devices If you were appointed director of quality for this company to save the current situation and solve the problems that the company is exposed to, what is the methodology that you will apply to discover and solve the_problem? And what are the steps that you will follow in order with mentioning the improvement tools that you can use in each step? :Answer a. The methodology used: b. Improvement steps Explanation of the improvement Serial step Improvement tools used
1. Brian a 16-year-old, purchased a pool table with all of the accessories. Three weeks later, Brian tried to return the pool table. He told the seller that he had decided to keep all of the accessories. Can Brian avoid the contract in this way?
Jose purchased a second-hand riding lawnmower from the manufacturer, ABC Inc. Before using the mower, Jose opened the hood to fill up the gas tank. He took off the cap and placed it on the tank. He started to pour in the gas. He had to stop to get the cap when it rolled off the tank. He again placed in the hood and continue to pour the gas into the tank. The cap again rolled away and, this time, it hit the battery and caused a spark that ignited the gasoline fumes. As the fire started, he dropped off the gasoline container that he was holding on and spilled the gas which resulted in a blazing fire that destroyed his garage and home. ABC Ltd. is aware of the problem since there were several incidents and lawsuits. To address this problem, ABC Inc. manufactured a battery-covered and provide a safety kit to its customers. Jose was not aware of this issue nor receive a copy of a safety kit. Does ABC Inc owe a duty of care? Is the duty of care foreseeable? Does ABC Inc solution meet the…
X was injured while he was a passenger in a bus operated by Y Co. The proximate cause of the accident was the failure of the steering knuckle to work causing the driver to lose control of the wheel as a result of which the bus fell into a ditch. Can the operator now relieve itself of a liability by claiming that the real cause of accident was a fortiuitous event? Suppose that the proximate cause of the accident was a tire blowout, would that make a difference in your answer?
Answer please
Your attorney has recently interviewed Dr. Willard smith, who suffered an anaphylactic reaction to a dye that was used when administering a diagnostic test designed to test his pulmonary capacity. Because he temporarily stopped breathing but was not treated for about 10 minutes (it took that long for the paramedics to get to him), he became comatose for several weeks, and it was believed he was going to die. He regained consciousness and was in physical therapy for almost a year, regaining about 60 percent of the mobility and 40 percent of the manual dexterity he had before the incident. He is no longer able to work as a veterinarian and has sustained substantial financial as well as emotional losses as a result. Dr. Smith wants to sue the hospital where the test was administered. Your supervising attorney has asked you to do some preliminary research before she decides whether to accept this case.
A transit officer sees a 2-year-old child walking along the edge of a train station by herself. The officer realizes that it looks strange and dangerous that she is walking very close to the edge. While the child is standing next to the officer she prepares to jump onto the tracks. The officer could have could have grabbed her and pulled her back onto the platform, but he chose not to do so. Unfortunately, the child gets hit by a train and dies. The parents, were nearby and didn’t notice that their child walked away from them, sue the officer and the city for damages. What is the probable outcome of their suit? What if it wasn’t an officer but just another rider on the subway?
Arvo Lake, a retired 71-year-old man, bought an air conditioner in May. The unit was installed and operated according to the manufacturer's specifications. Unbeknownst to Lake, the unit contained a hole in the refrigeration system that allowed Freon, the coolant, to escape from the unit. By August, the unit had ceased cooling, and Lake's residence reached a temperature of at least 96 degrees Fahrenheit. The heat caused Lake to suffer from hyperthermia, which caused circulatory failure and then death. The executor of Lake's estate sued the manufacturer of the air conditioner for damages resulting from breach of warranty.Was Lake's death a foreseeable consequence of the air conditioner's failure to operate properly?
A long-time patient of Dr. Jones was admitted to the ICU. She was unable to respond and was having difficulty breathing. She required respirator support. Her son, her HCP, was called and came to the hospital. In discussion with the physician, the physician stated that he is aware of the patient’s wishes and suggests removing her from the respirator. The son said that he wants to keep his mother on the respirator. The physician insisted that he spoke with his mother at length and he knows that the patient does not want to be on a respirator. The son calls the Risk Manager to complain. You are the risk manager, what should be done?
Why do facts matter when it comes to warranties either implied or expressed?

SEE MORE QUESTIONS