apple vs samsung apple differentiates and samsung imperfectly imitates does  SAMSUNG’S STRATEGY OF IMITATING APPLE WILL NOT HARM THE BRAND IN THE LONG RU

Practical Management Science
6th Edition
ISBN:9781337406659
Author:WINSTON, Wayne L.
Publisher:WINSTON, Wayne L.
Chapter2: Introduction To Spreadsheet Modeling
Section: Chapter Questions
Problem 20P: Julie James is opening a lemonade stand. She believes the fixed cost per week of running the stand...
icon
Related questions
Question

apple vs samsung apple differentiates and samsung imperfectly imitates

does  SAMSUNG’S STRATEGY OF IMITATING APPLE WILL NOT HARM THE BRAND IN THE LONG RUN.

 

STRATEGIC FOCUS
APPLE VS SAMSUNG: APPLE DIFFERENTIATES AND SAMSUNG IMPERFECTLY IMITATES
TECHNOLOGY
Apple is not only a product innovator; it creates new markets and
then dominates them as a first mover. Apple has done this with
the iPod, iPhone and iPad. Almost none of its high-tech rivals,
such as Dell, Hewlett-Packard, Nokia and BlackBerry, have
offered a serious challenge. However, in recent times Samsung
has become a successful challenger of Apple. In fact, it has been
so successful that Apple took Samsung to court with several
lawsuits for patent infringement, and Samsung took action
against Apple t00. Apple won the 2012 lawsuit and a US$1 billion
judgment against Samsung. Thus, Samsung appears to be a
very good imitator - perhaps too good. But in 2014 another huge
lawsuit involving seven patents ended up close to a tie: Apple
The rivalry between the two electronic product companies
seems to focus on attempts to produce dominant designs.
Samsung acquired the services of one of the top designers in the
world, Chris Bangle, who gained fame with his designs of cars
for BMW. The design and product battles are now playing out in
other product markets, such as tablets, and perhaps smart TVs
and smart watches in the near future.
All of this suggests that Samsung is a formidable competitor
to Apple, but it is still far behind in profits, especially in profits
per unit of sales. For example, during the 2012 Christmas
holiday season, Apple sold 22.9 million iPads while Samsung
sold 7.6 million tablets. The Apple differentiation strategy based
on R&D and a superb brand is a winner.
won on five patents while Samsung won on two. There was then
a war of words, with Apple saying 'Samsung wilfully stole' ideas
and Samsung referring to 'grossly exaggerated claims'.
Sources: S. Tibken, 2015, Apple versus Samsung patent trial recap, CNET,
Actually, Samsung invests a lot in R&D to design products
for existing markets, about three times as much as Apple does -
importantly, its R&D represents about 5.4 per cent of its annual
May; M.-J. Lee, 2013, Samsung vs. Apple's next battleground: Watches?,
Wall Street Journal, http://blog.wsj.com, 19 March; R. Pendola, 2013, Apple
vs. Samsung explained with a burger and fries on Facebook, The Street,
http://www.thestreet.com, 18 March; H. Shaughnessy, 2013, Samsung
vs. Apple: The battle for design dominance, Forbes, http://www.forbes.
sales, whereas Apple invests only about 2.2 per cent of its annual
sales in R&D. As such, Samsung has been identified as a fast
second mover in existing markets. In this regard, it is effective
at not just imitating but changing features. In fact, it improves
on features that are attractive to customers. For example, its
Galaxy 4 smartphone had a 5-inch screen, larger than that of the
iPhone 5S and supposedly producing a sharper photo.
com, 17 March; B. X. Chen, 2013, Samsung's new 8-inch tablet takes on
the iPad Mini, New York Times - The Business of Technology, http://bits.
blogs.nytimes.com, 23 February; B. X. Chen, 2013, Samsung emerges as
a potent rival to Apple's cool, New York Times, 10 February; M. Veverka,
2013, Unplugged: Apple-Samsung showdown has diaper whiff, USA Today,
http://www.usatoday.com, 22 January; K. Eaton, 2013, Apple rumour
patrol: 2013 iPhone edition, Fast Company, http://www.fastcompany.com,
11 January.
egladn
Transcribed Image Text:STRATEGIC FOCUS APPLE VS SAMSUNG: APPLE DIFFERENTIATES AND SAMSUNG IMPERFECTLY IMITATES TECHNOLOGY Apple is not only a product innovator; it creates new markets and then dominates them as a first mover. Apple has done this with the iPod, iPhone and iPad. Almost none of its high-tech rivals, such as Dell, Hewlett-Packard, Nokia and BlackBerry, have offered a serious challenge. However, in recent times Samsung has become a successful challenger of Apple. In fact, it has been so successful that Apple took Samsung to court with several lawsuits for patent infringement, and Samsung took action against Apple t00. Apple won the 2012 lawsuit and a US$1 billion judgment against Samsung. Thus, Samsung appears to be a very good imitator - perhaps too good. But in 2014 another huge lawsuit involving seven patents ended up close to a tie: Apple The rivalry between the two electronic product companies seems to focus on attempts to produce dominant designs. Samsung acquired the services of one of the top designers in the world, Chris Bangle, who gained fame with his designs of cars for BMW. The design and product battles are now playing out in other product markets, such as tablets, and perhaps smart TVs and smart watches in the near future. All of this suggests that Samsung is a formidable competitor to Apple, but it is still far behind in profits, especially in profits per unit of sales. For example, during the 2012 Christmas holiday season, Apple sold 22.9 million iPads while Samsung sold 7.6 million tablets. The Apple differentiation strategy based on R&D and a superb brand is a winner. won on five patents while Samsung won on two. There was then a war of words, with Apple saying 'Samsung wilfully stole' ideas and Samsung referring to 'grossly exaggerated claims'. Sources: S. Tibken, 2015, Apple versus Samsung patent trial recap, CNET, Actually, Samsung invests a lot in R&D to design products for existing markets, about three times as much as Apple does - importantly, its R&D represents about 5.4 per cent of its annual May; M.-J. Lee, 2013, Samsung vs. Apple's next battleground: Watches?, Wall Street Journal, http://blog.wsj.com, 19 March; R. Pendola, 2013, Apple vs. Samsung explained with a burger and fries on Facebook, The Street, http://www.thestreet.com, 18 March; H. Shaughnessy, 2013, Samsung vs. Apple: The battle for design dominance, Forbes, http://www.forbes. sales, whereas Apple invests only about 2.2 per cent of its annual sales in R&D. As such, Samsung has been identified as a fast second mover in existing markets. In this regard, it is effective at not just imitating but changing features. In fact, it improves on features that are attractive to customers. For example, its Galaxy 4 smartphone had a 5-inch screen, larger than that of the iPhone 5S and supposedly producing a sharper photo. com, 17 March; B. X. Chen, 2013, Samsung's new 8-inch tablet takes on the iPad Mini, New York Times - The Business of Technology, http://bits. blogs.nytimes.com, 23 February; B. X. Chen, 2013, Samsung emerges as a potent rival to Apple's cool, New York Times, 10 February; M. Veverka, 2013, Unplugged: Apple-Samsung showdown has diaper whiff, USA Today, http://www.usatoday.com, 22 January; K. Eaton, 2013, Apple rumour patrol: 2013 iPhone edition, Fast Company, http://www.fastcompany.com, 11 January. egladn
Expert Solution
trending now

Trending now

This is a popular solution!

steps

Step by step

Solved in 2 steps

Blurred answer
Knowledge Booster
Communication challenges
Learn more about
Need a deep-dive on the concept behind this application? Look no further. Learn more about this topic, operations-management and related others by exploring similar questions and additional content below.
Similar questions
Recommended textbooks for you
Practical Management Science
Practical Management Science
Operations Management
ISBN:
9781337406659
Author:
WINSTON, Wayne L.
Publisher:
Cengage,
Operations Management
Operations Management
Operations Management
ISBN:
9781259667473
Author:
William J Stevenson
Publisher:
McGraw-Hill Education
Operations and Supply Chain Management (Mcgraw-hi…
Operations and Supply Chain Management (Mcgraw-hi…
Operations Management
ISBN:
9781259666100
Author:
F. Robert Jacobs, Richard B Chase
Publisher:
McGraw-Hill Education
Business in Action
Business in Action
Operations Management
ISBN:
9780135198100
Author:
BOVEE
Publisher:
PEARSON CO
Purchasing and Supply Chain Management
Purchasing and Supply Chain Management
Operations Management
ISBN:
9781285869681
Author:
Robert M. Monczka, Robert B. Handfield, Larry C. Giunipero, James L. Patterson
Publisher:
Cengage Learning
Production and Operations Analysis, Seventh Editi…
Production and Operations Analysis, Seventh Editi…
Operations Management
ISBN:
9781478623069
Author:
Steven Nahmias, Tava Lennon Olsen
Publisher:
Waveland Press, Inc.