An executive believes that a new energy drink his company developed will increase an individual's stamina. In order to test this, he selects random individuals and times how long they can run without stopping. He then instructs the individuals to drink the energy drink for two weeks. After the two weeks, he times how long they can run again without stopping. Suppose that data were collected for a random sample of 35 people, where each difference is calculated by subtracting the time spent running before the two-week period from the time spent running after the two-week period. Assume that the times are normally distributed. The test statistic is t≈6.298, α=0.01, the corresponding rejection region is t>2.441, the null hypothesis is H0:μd=0, and the alternative hypothesis is Ha:μd>0. Which of the following statements are accurate for this hypothesis test in order to evaluate the claim that the true mean difference between the time spent running after the two-week period from the time spent running before the two-week period is greater than zero? Select all that apply:  A) Fail to reject the null hypothesis that the true mean difference between the time spent running after the two-week period from the time spent running before the two-week period is equal to zero. B) Reject the null hypothesis that the true mean difference between the time spent running after the two-week period from the time spent running before the two-week period is equal to zero. C) Based on the results of the hypothesis test, there is not enough evidence at the α=0.01 level of significance to suggest that the true mean difference between the time spent running after the two-week period from the time spent running before the two-week period is greater than zero. D) Based on the results of the hypothesis test, there is enough evidence at the α=0.01 level of significance to suggest that the true mean difference between the time spent running after the two-week period from the time spent running before the two-week period is greater than zero.

MATLAB: An Introduction with Applications
6th Edition
ISBN:9781119256830
Author:Amos Gilat
Publisher:Amos Gilat
Chapter1: Starting With Matlab
Section: Chapter Questions
Problem 1P
icon
Related questions
icon
Concept explainers
Question

An executive believes that a new energy drink his company developed will increase an individual's stamina. In order to test this, he selects random individuals and times how long they can run without stopping. He then instructs the individuals to drink the energy drink for two weeks. After the two weeks, he times how long they can run again without stopping. Suppose that data were collected for a random sample of 35 people, where each difference is calculated by subtracting the time spent running before the two-week period from the time spent running after the two-week period. Assume that the times are normally distributed. The test statistic is t≈6.298, α=0.01, the corresponding rejection region is t>2.441, the null hypothesis is H0:μd=0, and the alternative hypothesis is Ha:μd>0.

Which of the following statements are accurate for this hypothesis test in order to evaluate the claim that the true mean difference between the time spent running after the two-week period from the time spent running before the two-week period is greater than zero?

Select all that apply: 

A) Fail to reject the null hypothesis that the true mean difference between the time spent running after the two-week period from the time spent running before the two-week period is equal to zero.

B) Reject the null hypothesis that the true mean difference between the time spent running after the two-week period from the time spent running before the two-week period is equal to zero.

C) Based on the results of the hypothesis test, there is not enough evidence at the α=0.01 level of significance to suggest that the true mean difference between the time spent running after the two-week period from the time spent running before the two-week period is greater than zero.

D) Based on the results of the hypothesis test, there is enough evidence at the α=0.01 level of significance to suggest that the true mean difference between the time spent running after the two-week period from the time spent running before the two-week period is greater than zero.

Expert Solution
trending now

Trending now

This is a popular solution!

steps

Step by step

Solved in 3 steps

Blurred answer
Knowledge Booster
Continuous Probability Distribution
Learn more about
Need a deep-dive on the concept behind this application? Look no further. Learn more about this topic, statistics and related others by exploring similar questions and additional content below.
Similar questions
  • SEE MORE QUESTIONS
Recommended textbooks for you
MATLAB: An Introduction with Applications
MATLAB: An Introduction with Applications
Statistics
ISBN:
9781119256830
Author:
Amos Gilat
Publisher:
John Wiley & Sons Inc
Probability and Statistics for Engineering and th…
Probability and Statistics for Engineering and th…
Statistics
ISBN:
9781305251809
Author:
Jay L. Devore
Publisher:
Cengage Learning
Statistics for The Behavioral Sciences (MindTap C…
Statistics for The Behavioral Sciences (MindTap C…
Statistics
ISBN:
9781305504912
Author:
Frederick J Gravetter, Larry B. Wallnau
Publisher:
Cengage Learning
Elementary Statistics: Picturing the World (7th E…
Elementary Statistics: Picturing the World (7th E…
Statistics
ISBN:
9780134683416
Author:
Ron Larson, Betsy Farber
Publisher:
PEARSON
The Basic Practice of Statistics
The Basic Practice of Statistics
Statistics
ISBN:
9781319042578
Author:
David S. Moore, William I. Notz, Michael A. Fligner
Publisher:
W. H. Freeman
Introduction to the Practice of Statistics
Introduction to the Practice of Statistics
Statistics
ISBN:
9781319013387
Author:
David S. Moore, George P. McCabe, Bruce A. Craig
Publisher:
W. H. Freeman