A social behavior researcher interviews participants who are having financial difficulties. Participants reveal enough information during the interviews that the data can be interpreted as containing personally identifiable information (PII). The researcher finds one of the interviews too amusing to keep to themselves, so they share the entire interview with a friend who is unrelated to the study in any way. Discuss this scenario in 100 words. Did this researcher violate data or research ethics? If so, what data or research ethics principles apply here? What additional information would you need to make a decision if you believe the situation is ambiguous? What should this researcher have done differently, and what should they do differently in the future?

A social behavior researcher interviews participants who are having financial difficulties. Participants reveal enough information during the interviews that the data can be interpreted as containing personally identifiable information (PII). The researcher finds one of the interviews too amusing to keep to themselves, so they share the entire interview with a friend who is unrelated to the study in any way. Discuss this scenario in 100 words. Did this researcher violate data or research ethics? If so, what data or research ethics principles apply here? What additional information would you need to make a decision if you believe the situation is ambiguous? What should this researcher have done differently, and what should they do differently in the future?

ENGR.ECONOMIC ANALYSIS

14th Edition

ISBN:9780190931919

Author:NEWNAN

Publisher:NEWNAN

Chapter1: Making Economics Decisions

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 1QTC

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

Can you check my answers? Respond to the question with a concise and accurate answer, along with a clear explanation and step-by-step solution, or risk receiving a downvote.
Most hospitals and nursing homes, and some insurance companies, do not aim to maximize profit but aim instead to maximize other more altruistic goals such as the number of covered lives. Group of answer choices True False
In experiments in which participants voluntarily contribute to the provision of a public good, we often find a reduction in contributions in successive rounds of the experiment. We can explain this as Group of answer choices Evidence of participants reaching satiation and not wanting such high levels of the public good. Evidence of participants working out the Nash equilibrium outcome of the voluntary contribution game. Evidence of participants reducing cooperation to punish free riding. Evidence of participants learning how to play the game more effectively.
interest). At what age is the rate of disease development the highest? Source: Adapted from P. Coleman et al., “Endemic Stability―A Veterinary Idea Applied to Public Health," The Lancet 357 (2001): 1284–86. 19. If C(x) is the cost of producing x units of a commodity, then the average cost per unit is c(x) = C(x)/x. The marginal cost is the rate of change of the cost with respect to the number of items produced, that is, the derivative C'(x). (a) Show that if the average cost is a minimum, then the marginal cost equals the average cost. (b) If C(x) = 16,000 + 200x + 4x³/2, in dollars, find (i) the cost, average cost, and marginal cost at a produc- tion level of 1000 units; (ii) the production level that will minimize the average cost; and (iii) the minimum average cost. 20. If R(x) is the revenue that a company receives when it sells x units of a product, then the marginal revenue function is the derivative R'(x). The profit function is
The following is an excerpt describing the Oregon Medicaid lottery: In 2008, Oregon implemented a limited expansion of its Medicaid program for low-income adults through a lottery, selecting names from a waiting list to fill a limited number of available spots. Those selected had the opportunity to apply for Medicaid and to enroll if they met eligibility requirements. Based on the description, you might describe the Oregon Medicaid lottery as a: randomized experiment "As if random" natural experiment a true natural experiment
For questions 44 and 45 consider the following: The town of Fenerbahce has hired world-class econometricians to investigate their criminal justice system. The researchers report an interesting finding. People who were previously detected and punished by law enforcers gain a better understanding of the functioning of the law enforcement system, and are better able to exploit laws designed to protect defendants against the state. Thus, people who have been detected and punished before are better able to avoid detection and punishment. In particular, they report the following facts: The offense of jay-walking causes social harm of $100. A person who has never been punished for jaywalking before faces a 0.5 probability of being detected while jaywalking. A person who has been punished before for jaywalking faces a probability of 0.25 of being detected while jaywalking. The town wants to implement optimal punishment schemes. It is well known that everyone in Fenerbahce is risk-neutral and…
In the early 2000s, the state of Massachusetts in the U.S. implemented a health reform aimed at enrolling people without health insurance into an insurance plan. The reform required people without health insurance (at least those who could afford it) to buy insurance, and put in place penalties on those who nevertheless chose not to buy insurance. Below is the abstract of a recent National Bureau of Economic Research working paper entitled “Health Reform, Health Insurance, and Selection: Estimating Selection into Health Insurance Using the Massachusetts Health Reform” by Martin Hackmann, Jonathan Kolstad, and Amanda Kowalski. The authors conducted a study of the effects of the Massachusetts reform. They write: We implement an empirical test for selection into health insurance using changes in coverage induced by the introduction of mandated health insurance in Massachusetts. Our test examines changes in the cost of the newly insured relative to those who were insured prior to the…
What is the key assumption in the difference-in-differences method? Two groups of people should have the same potential outcomes Two groups of people should have the same time trend in their potential outcomes Two groups of people should have the same potential outcomes before the policy is in place Two groups of people should have the same potential outcomes after the policy is in place
Peoples' behavior in behavioral economic games like the Dictator Game generally show that Many people seem to prefer outcomes that benefit others Under conditions of anonymity, most people are completely selfish. People are not generous unless they are in situations in which their partners will be able to reciprocate. There is very little variation in peoples' responses across cultures.