A social behavior researcher interviews participants who are having financial difficulties. Participants reveal enough information during the interviews that the data can be interpreted as containing personally identifiable information (PII). The researcher finds one of the interviews too amusing to keep to themselves, so they share the entire interview with a friend who is unrelated to the study in any way. Discuss this scenario in 100 words. Did this researcher violate data or research ethics? If so, what data or research ethics principles apply here? What additional information would you need to make a decision if you believe the situation is ambiguous? What should this researcher have done differently, and what should they do differently in the future?

A social behavior researcher interviews participants who are having financial difficulties. Participants reveal enough information during the interviews that the data can be interpreted as containing personally identifiable information (PII). The researcher finds one of the interviews too amusing to keep to themselves, so they share the entire interview with a friend who is unrelated to the study in any way. Discuss this scenario in 100 words. Did this researcher violate data or research ethics? If so, what data or research ethics principles apply here? What additional information would you need to make a decision if you believe the situation is ambiguous? What should this researcher have done differently, and what should they do differently in the future?

ENGR.ECONOMIC ANALYSIS

14th Edition

ISBN:9780190931919

Author:NEWNAN

Publisher:NEWNAN

Chapter1: Making Economics Decisions

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 1QTC

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

With focus group interviews, researchers try to select a large sample so that they can extend the results to the whole population. b) the objective is to get the group to interact, so that many ideas are generated. e) it is typical for the researcher to develop quantitative summaries of the results. d) marketing managers can estimate the size of the market for a new product. e) consumers talk as a group for about 10 minutes and then meet individually with an interviewer.
The city council hired three college interns to measure public support for a large parks and recreation initiative in their city. The interns mailed surveys to 500 randomly selected participants in the current public recreation program. They received 150 responses. In this case, which of the following is the population of interest? A.O The participants who support the initiative B.O All members of the community C.O All participants in the city's recreation program D.O The 150 people who responded E. The 500 people who got the survey
In experiments in which participants voluntarily contribute to the provision of a public good, we often find a reduction in contributions in successive rounds of the experiment. We can explain this as Group of answer choices Evidence of participants reaching satiation and not wanting such high levels of the public good. Evidence of participants working out the Nash equilibrium outcome of the voluntary contribution game. Evidence of participants reducing cooperation to punish free riding. Evidence of participants learning how to play the game more effectively.
The following is an excerpt describing the Oregon Medicaid lottery: In 2008, Oregon implemented a limited expansion of its Medicaid program for low-income adults through a lottery, selecting names from a waiting list to fill a limited number of available spots. Those selected had the opportunity to apply for Medicaid and to enroll if they met eligibility requirements. Based on the description, you might describe the Oregon Medicaid lottery as a: randomized experiment "As if random" natural experiment a true natural experiment
There are two types of drivers, safe types who have an annual probability of getting in an accident of 10% and risky types who get in a car crash with probability 20%. Each type represents half of the population. When a car crash occurs, it costs the insurance company $10,000. This problem is about asymmetric information, specifically in insurance markets. To answer this question, it helps to understand insurance. Insurance contracts work in the following way. The amount that the insurer pays in the event of an accident is Payout = (Accident cost - Deductible) *Coinsurance rate. The rest is paid by the individual. The expected value of a firm's expenses are E[Payout] = (probability of an accident)*Payout. The insurance premium is the price the consumer pays for insurance. It is paid regardless of whether there is an accident. Therefore, the insurer's expected profit = Premium - E[Payout]. a. Suppose the insurer offered only one type of contract: deductible=0 and coinsurance rate= 100%.…