A sample of water was enumerated using a counting chamber (haemocytometer) and 220 bacterial cells were counted in 25 small squares (each of volume 2.5 x 10-7 cm3). Viable counts were carried out on the same culture using both the pour plate method (incorporating 1 mL samples of a range of dilutions into plate count agar plates) and the Miles & Misra spread plate method, where 0.02 mL samples were spread on sectors of a plate count agar plate. For the pour plate count the average of triplicate samples was 178 colonies per plate of the 10-4dilution. For the Miles and Misra count the average of triplicate samples was 21.3 colonies per sector of the 10-4 dilution. Calculate the total count and the viable pour plate and spread plate counts and suggest possible reasons for the difference between the three different counts.
A sample of water was enumerated using a counting chamber (haemocytometer) and 220 bacterial cells were counted in 25 small squares (each of volume 2.5 x 10-7 cm3).
Viable counts were carried out on the same culture using both the pour plate method (incorporating 1 mL samples of a range of dilutions into plate count agar plates) and the Miles & Misra spread plate method, where 0.02 mL samples were spread on sectors of a plate count agar plate. For the pour plate count the average of triplicate samples was 178 colonies per plate of the 10-4dilution. For the Miles and Misra count the average of triplicate samples was 21.3 colonies per sector of the 10-4 dilution.
Calculate the total count and the viable pour plate and spread plate counts and suggest possible reasons for the difference between the three different counts.
Trending now
This is a popular solution!
Step by step
Solved in 2 steps