A personal computer manufacturer is interested in comparing assembly times for two keyboard assembly processes. Process 1 is an updated process hoped to bring a decrease in assembly time, while Process 2 is the standard process used for several years. Assembly times can vary considerably from worker to worker, and the company decides to eliminate this effect by selecting a random sample of 12 workers and timing each worker on each assembly process. Half of the workers are chosen at random to use Process 1 first, and the rest use Process 2 first. For each worker and each process, the assembly time (in minutes) is recorded, as shown in Table 1. Worker Process 1 Process 2 Difference(Process 1 - Process 2) 1 50 51 -1 2 30 34 -4 3 76 79 -3 4 67 79 -12 5 61 91 -30 6 52 64 -12 7 30 64 -34 8 47 82 -35 9 54 79 -25 10 64 67 -3 11 34 36 -2 12 82 88 -6 Table 1 Based on these data, can the company conclude, at the 0.10 level of significance, that the mean assembly time for Process 2 exceeds that of Process 1? Answer this question by performing a hypothesis test regarding μd (which is μ with a letter "d" subscript), the population mean difference in assembly times for the two processes. Assume that this population of differences (Process 1 minus Process 2) is normally distributed. Perform a one-tailed test. The null hypothesis: H0: The alternative hypothesis: H1: The type of test statistic: (Choose one)ZtChi squareF The value of the test statistic:(Round to at least three decimal places.) The critical value at the 0.10 level of significance:(Round to at least three decimal places.) At the 0.10 level, can the company conclude that the mean assembly time for Process 2 exceeds that of Process 1? Yes No
A personal computer manufacturer is interested in comparing assembly times for two keyboard assembly processes. Process 1 is an updated process hoped to bring a decrease in assembly time, while Process 2 is the standard process used for several years. Assembly times can vary considerably from worker to worker, and the company decides to eliminate this effect by selecting a random sample of
workers and timing each worker on each assembly process. Half of the workers are chosen at random to use Process 1 first, and the rest use Process 2 first. For each worker and each process, the assembly time (in minutes) is recorded, as shown in Table 1.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Table 1 |
Based on these data, can the company conclude, at the
level of significance, that the
(which is
with a letter "d" subscript), the population mean difference in assembly times for the two processes. Assume that this population of differences (Process 1 minus Process 2) is
Perform a one-tailed test.
|
|
Trending now
This is a popular solution!
Step by step
Solved in 3 steps with 2 images