Dr. Jarry applies for a research grant to examine whether electrolyte-enriched water affects athletic performance. They propose enrolling 50 college distance runners who will consume 28 ounces of water or 28 ounces of an electrolyte-enriched solution 30 minutes before running a timed 5000 meter race. Dr. Jarry states that runners will be randomly assigned to the control group (distilled water) or the treatment group (electrolyte- enriched water). Both the electrolyte solution and the distilled water will be provided to the runners in unlabeled opaque bottles. The electrolyte solution is identical in appearance and taste to distilled water. Unfortunately, the funding agency rejects the proposal due to inadequate blinding procedures. Which of the following might have been a reason for the funding agency to reject the proposal? It is not clear whether the researcher is blinded It is not clear whether the subjects are blinded It is not clear whether either the researcher or the subjects are blinded

MATLAB: An Introduction with Applications
6th Edition
ISBN:9781119256830
Author:Amos Gilat
Publisher:Amos Gilat
Chapter1: Starting With Matlab
Section: Chapter Questions
Problem 1P
icon
Related questions
Question
**Blinding Procedures in Research Studies: A Case Study**

**Overview:**
Dr. Jarry applies for a research grant to examine whether electrolyte-enriched water affects athletic performance. They propose enrolling 50 college distance runners who will consume 28 ounces of water or 28 ounces of an electrolyte-enriched solution 30 minutes before running a timed 5000 meter race. Dr. Jarry states that runners will be randomly assigned to the control group (distilled water) or the treatment group (electrolyte-enriched water). Both the electrolyte solution and the distilled water will be provided to the runners in unlabeled opaque bottles. The electrolyte solution is identical in appearance and taste to distilled water.

**Issue:**
Unfortunately, the funding agency rejects the proposal due to inadequate blinding procedures.

**Question:**
Which of the following might have been a reason for the funding agency to reject the proposal?

**Options:**
1. It is not clear whether the researcher is blinded.
2. It is not clear whether the subjects are blinded.
3. It is not clear whether either the researcher or the subjects are blinded.

Given the context of the proposal, all three options highlight critical aspects of blinding that are necessary to eliminate bias in the study. Proper blinding ensures that neither the participants nor the researchers influence the outcomes of the study due to knowledge of the treatment assignments. This case study serves as an example of the importance of clear and thorough methodological planning to secure research funding.
Transcribed Image Text:**Blinding Procedures in Research Studies: A Case Study** **Overview:** Dr. Jarry applies for a research grant to examine whether electrolyte-enriched water affects athletic performance. They propose enrolling 50 college distance runners who will consume 28 ounces of water or 28 ounces of an electrolyte-enriched solution 30 minutes before running a timed 5000 meter race. Dr. Jarry states that runners will be randomly assigned to the control group (distilled water) or the treatment group (electrolyte-enriched water). Both the electrolyte solution and the distilled water will be provided to the runners in unlabeled opaque bottles. The electrolyte solution is identical in appearance and taste to distilled water. **Issue:** Unfortunately, the funding agency rejects the proposal due to inadequate blinding procedures. **Question:** Which of the following might have been a reason for the funding agency to reject the proposal? **Options:** 1. It is not clear whether the researcher is blinded. 2. It is not clear whether the subjects are blinded. 3. It is not clear whether either the researcher or the subjects are blinded. Given the context of the proposal, all three options highlight critical aspects of blinding that are necessary to eliminate bias in the study. Proper blinding ensures that neither the participants nor the researchers influence the outcomes of the study due to knowledge of the treatment assignments. This case study serves as an example of the importance of clear and thorough methodological planning to secure research funding.
Expert Solution
steps

Step by step

Solved in 3 steps

Blurred answer
Similar questions
  • SEE MORE QUESTIONS
Recommended textbooks for you
MATLAB: An Introduction with Applications
MATLAB: An Introduction with Applications
Statistics
ISBN:
9781119256830
Author:
Amos Gilat
Publisher:
John Wiley & Sons Inc
Probability and Statistics for Engineering and th…
Probability and Statistics for Engineering and th…
Statistics
ISBN:
9781305251809
Author:
Jay L. Devore
Publisher:
Cengage Learning
Statistics for The Behavioral Sciences (MindTap C…
Statistics for The Behavioral Sciences (MindTap C…
Statistics
ISBN:
9781305504912
Author:
Frederick J Gravetter, Larry B. Wallnau
Publisher:
Cengage Learning
Elementary Statistics: Picturing the World (7th E…
Elementary Statistics: Picturing the World (7th E…
Statistics
ISBN:
9780134683416
Author:
Ron Larson, Betsy Farber
Publisher:
PEARSON
The Basic Practice of Statistics
The Basic Practice of Statistics
Statistics
ISBN:
9781319042578
Author:
David S. Moore, William I. Notz, Michael A. Fligner
Publisher:
W. H. Freeman
Introduction to the Practice of Statistics
Introduction to the Practice of Statistics
Statistics
ISBN:
9781319013387
Author:
David S. Moore, George P. McCabe, Bruce A. Craig
Publisher:
W. H. Freeman