A case-control study of patients on antihypertensive drugs related an increased risk of myocardial infarction (MI) for patients using calcium channel blockers. In this study, cases were antihypertensive drug patients who had suffered a first fatal or nonfatal MI through 1993, and controls were antihypertensive drug patients, matched by demographic factors, who had not suffered a MI. Among the comparisons reported were patients receiving calcium channel (CC) blockers (with and without diuretics) and patients receiving ß-blockers (with and without diuretics). Results of numbers of patient by drug/MI status combination are given in the following table. Antihypertensive O HO: p1=p2 vs. Ha: p1 < p2 O HO: p1>p2 vs. Ha: p1=p2 CC blocker B-blocker Drug Does it appear that an increased risk of myocardial infarction (MI) is related to using calcium channel (CC) blockers? The case-control nature of this study requires we compare the proportion of CC blocker users among those had MI attack (p1) vs. the proportion of CC blocker users among those had no MI (p2). What is your hypothesis for this test? O HO: p1=p2 vs. Ha: p1=p2 O HO: p1=p2 vs. Ha: p1>p2 Occurrence of Yes (cases) 80 85 Myocardial Infarction No (controls) 230 395

MATLAB: An Introduction with Applications
6th Edition
ISBN:9781119256830
Author:Amos Gilat
Publisher:Amos Gilat
Chapter1: Starting With Matlab
Section: Chapter Questions
Problem 1P
icon
Related questions
Question
A case-control study of patients on antihypertensive drugs related an increased risk of myocardial infarction (MI) for patients using calcium channel blockers. In this study, cases were
antihypertensive drug patients who had suffered a first fatal or nonfatal MI through 1993, and controls were antihypertensive drug patients, matched by demographic factors, who had not
suffered a MI. Among the comparisons reported were patients receiving calcium channel (CC) blockers (with and without diuretics) and patients receiving B-blockers (with and without
diuretics). Results of numbers of patient by drug/MI status combination are given in the following table.
Antihypertensive
O HO: p1=p2 vs. Ha: p1 < p2
O HO: p1> p2 vs. Ha: p1=p2
Drug
Does it appear that an increased risk of myocardial infarction (MI) is related to using calcium channel (CC) blockers? The case-control nature of this study requires we compare the
proportion of CC blocker users among those had MI attack (p1) vs. the proportion of CC blocker users among those had no MI (p2).
What is your hypothesis for this test?
O HO: p1p2 vs. Ha: p1=p2
CC blocker
B-blocker
O HO: p1=p2 vs. Ha: p1 > p2
Occurrence of
Yes (cases)
80
85
Myocardial Infarction
No (controls)
230
395
Transcribed Image Text:A case-control study of patients on antihypertensive drugs related an increased risk of myocardial infarction (MI) for patients using calcium channel blockers. In this study, cases were antihypertensive drug patients who had suffered a first fatal or nonfatal MI through 1993, and controls were antihypertensive drug patients, matched by demographic factors, who had not suffered a MI. Among the comparisons reported were patients receiving calcium channel (CC) blockers (with and without diuretics) and patients receiving B-blockers (with and without diuretics). Results of numbers of patient by drug/MI status combination are given in the following table. Antihypertensive O HO: p1=p2 vs. Ha: p1 < p2 O HO: p1> p2 vs. Ha: p1=p2 Drug Does it appear that an increased risk of myocardial infarction (MI) is related to using calcium channel (CC) blockers? The case-control nature of this study requires we compare the proportion of CC blocker users among those had MI attack (p1) vs. the proportion of CC blocker users among those had no MI (p2). What is your hypothesis for this test? O HO: p1p2 vs. Ha: p1=p2 CC blocker B-blocker O HO: p1=p2 vs. Ha: p1 > p2 Occurrence of Yes (cases) 80 85 Myocardial Infarction No (controls) 230 395
True or False?
[Select]
confidence interval.
[Select]
✓ We are 95% confident that the difference in the proportion of CC blocker users between patients had MI attack and those had no MI is within the
✓ The confidence interval is calculated using a method that gives correct answers 95% of the time.
Transcribed Image Text:True or False? [Select] confidence interval. [Select] ✓ We are 95% confident that the difference in the proportion of CC blocker users between patients had MI attack and those had no MI is within the ✓ The confidence interval is calculated using a method that gives correct answers 95% of the time.
Expert Solution
steps

Step by step

Solved in 2 steps

Blurred answer
Similar questions
Recommended textbooks for you
MATLAB: An Introduction with Applications
MATLAB: An Introduction with Applications
Statistics
ISBN:
9781119256830
Author:
Amos Gilat
Publisher:
John Wiley & Sons Inc
Probability and Statistics for Engineering and th…
Probability and Statistics for Engineering and th…
Statistics
ISBN:
9781305251809
Author:
Jay L. Devore
Publisher:
Cengage Learning
Statistics for The Behavioral Sciences (MindTap C…
Statistics for The Behavioral Sciences (MindTap C…
Statistics
ISBN:
9781305504912
Author:
Frederick J Gravetter, Larry B. Wallnau
Publisher:
Cengage Learning
Elementary Statistics: Picturing the World (7th E…
Elementary Statistics: Picturing the World (7th E…
Statistics
ISBN:
9780134683416
Author:
Ron Larson, Betsy Farber
Publisher:
PEARSON
The Basic Practice of Statistics
The Basic Practice of Statistics
Statistics
ISBN:
9781319042578
Author:
David S. Moore, William I. Notz, Michael A. Fligner
Publisher:
W. H. Freeman
Introduction to the Practice of Statistics
Introduction to the Practice of Statistics
Statistics
ISBN:
9781319013387
Author:
David S. Moore, George P. McCabe, Bruce A. Craig
Publisher:
W. H. Freeman