9.22 Do video game players have superior visual attentionskills? Researchers at Griffin University (Australia) con-ducted a study to determine whether video game playershave superior visual attention skills compared to non-videogame players (Journal of Articles in Support of the NullHypothesis, Vol. 6, 2009). Two groups of male psychol-ogy students-32 video game players (VGP group) and28 nonplayers (NVGP group)-were subjected to a seriesof visual attention tasks that included the attentional blinktest. A test for the difference between two means yieldedt = -.93 and p-value = .358. Consequently, the research-ers reported that "no statistically significant differences inthe mean test performances of the two groups were found."Summary statistics for the comparison are provided in thetable. Do you agree with the researchers conclusion?VGPNVGPSample size3228Mean score84.8182.64Standard deviation9.568.43

Approach to solving the question: Detailed explanation: Examples: Key references:

Answered: 9.22 Do video game players have…

Glencoe Algebra 1, Student Edition, 9780079039897, 0079039898, 2018

18th Edition

ISBN:9780079039897

Author:Carter

Publisher:Carter

Chapter4: Equations Of Linear Functions

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 8SGR

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

What is meant by the sample space of an experiment?
McAllister et al. (2012) compared varsity football and hockey players with varsity athletes from noncontact sports to determine whether exposure to head impacts during one season have an effect on cognitive performance. In the study, tests of new learning performance were significantly poorer for the contact sport athletes compared to the noncontact sport athletes. The following table presents data similar to the results obtained in the study. Noncontact Athletes: 10, 8, 7, 9, 13, 7, 6, 12 Contact Athletes: 7, 4, 9, 3, 7, 6, 10, 2 a. Are the test scores significantly lower for the contact sport athletes than for the noncontact athletes? Use a one-tailed test with =.05 t-critical= t= b. Compute the value of (percentage of variance accounted for) for these data. r^2= a. 0.123, b. 0.239, c. 0.138, d. 0.264
McAllister et al. (2012) compared varsity football and hockey players with varsity athletes from noncontact sports to determine whether exposure to head impacts during one season have an effect on cognitive performance. In the study, tests of new learning performance were significantly poorer for the contact sport athletes compared to the noncontact sport athletes. The following table presents data similar to the results obtained in the study. Noncontact Athletes: 10, 8, 7, 9, 13, 7, 6, 12 Contact Athletes: 7, 4, 9, 3, 7, 6, 10, 2 a. Are the test scores significantly lower for the contact sport athletes than for the noncontact athletes? Use a two-tailed test with =.05 b. What sampling technique was most likely employed by the researcher? justify your answer c. Does exposure to head impacts have an effect on cognitive performance? why or why not
A study investigating the effect of student gender on poor academic performance (measured as having a grade of B or lower) at the University of Colorado reported that 17% of male students had poor performance and that 11% of female students had poor performance. Given this information, can we determine if there is an association between sex and academic performance? (Choose the one best answer). Group of answer choices Yes, female students have a lower rate of poor academic performance therefore poor academic performance is associated with being a female student. No, male students only have a slightly higher prevalence of poor academic performance compared to female students and therefore there is no association between poor performance and gender. Yes, male students have a higher rate of poor academic performance therefore poor academic performance is associated with being a male student. No, the prevalence values alone cannot be used to assess an association between…
Cell Phones and Handedness A study was conducted to investigate the association between cell phone use and hemispheric brain dominance. Among 216 subjects who prefer to use their left ear for cell phones, 166 were right-handed. Among 452 subjects who prefer to use their right ear for cell phones, 436 were right-handed (based on data from “Hemispheric Dominance and Cell Phone Use,” by Seidman et al., JAMA Otolaryngology—Head & Neck Surgery, Vol. 139, No. 5). We want to use a 0.01 significance level to test the claim that the rate of right-handedness for those who prefer to use their left ear for cell phones is less than the rate of right-handedness for those who prefer to use their right ear for cell phones. (Try not to get too confused here.) a. Test the claim using a hypothesis test. b. Test the claim by constructing an appropriate confidence interval.
The paper "Deception and Design: The Impact of Communication Technology on Lying Behavior"+ describes an investigation into whether lying is less common in face-to-face communication than in other forms of communication such as phone conversations or e-mail. Participants in this study were 30 students in an upper-division communications course at Cornell University who received course credit for participation. Participants were asked to record all of their social interactions for a week, making note of any lies told. Based on data from these records, the authors of the paper concluded that students lie more often in phone conversations than in face-to-face conversations and more often in face-to-face conversations than in e-mail. Discuss the limitations of this study, commenting on the way the sample was selected and potential sources of bias. (Select all that apply.) O Students knew that they were surveying themselves as to the truthfulness of their interactions, which could have…
12. McAllister et al. (2012) compared varsity football and hockey players with varsity athletes from noncontact sports to determine whether exposure to head impacts during one season have an effect on cognitive perfor- mance. In the study, tests of new learning performance were significantly poorer for the contact sport athletes compared to the noncontact sport athletes. The follow- ing table presents data similar to the results obtained in the study. Noncontact Athletes Contact Athletes 10 7 8 4 7 9. 9 3 13 7 7 10 12 2 a. Are the test scores significantly lower for the con- tact sport athletes than for the noncontact athletes? Use a one-tailed test with a = .05. b. Compute the value of r (percentage of variance accounted for) for these data.
Phonics is an instructional method in which children are taught to connect sounds with letters or groups of letters. The article “Predictive Accuracy of Nonsense Word Fluency for English Language Learners” (M. Vanderwood, D. Linklater, and K. Healy, School Psychology Review, 2008:5–17) reports that in a sample of 134 English-learning students, the correlation between the score on a phonics test given in first grade and a reading comprehension given in third grade was r = 0.25. Can you conclude that there is a positive correlation between phonics test score and the reading comprehension score?
The paper "Portable Social Groups: Willingness to Communicate, Interpersonal Communication Gratifications, and Cell Phone Use among Young Adults"+ describes a study of young adult cell phone use patterns. (a) Comment on the following quote from the paper. Do you agree with the authors? Seven sections of an Introduction to Mass Communication course at a large southern university were surveyed in the spring and fall of 2003. The sample was chosen because it offered an excellent representation of the population under study-young adults. O No, the sample doesn't offer a good representation of young adults because it consisted only of students taking one particular course at one particular university. O No, the sample doesn't offer a good representation of young adults because it consisted of students from fewer than ten sections of the course. O Yes, the sample does offer a good representation of young adults because the university is large and students were sampled in both the spring and…
What does an interaction in two-way ANOVA mean? (I’m not asking what it looks like graphically, but what does it mean?)
The purpose of this study was to quantify a hypothesized difference in participants' general personalities compared to their personalities during online social interactions. 157 undergraduate students completed a self-report survey assessing the Big Five personality factors twice (one with regular instructions and one with modified instructions regarding online personality). Participants were categorized as high or low in agreeableness online. They were also categorized as high or low in agreeableness in general. Are online agreeableness and general agreeableness independent? What are the independent and dependent variable(s)? What statistical test should be used? - McNemar Test - One Sample T Test - Pearsons Correlation Coefficient - Pearsons Chi Square - Coefficient of Contingency - Spearman’s Rho - Simple Linear Regression
Summers et al (2021) hypothesised that people believe that pain is influenced by socio-economic status (SES); specifically, that low SES individuals are believed to be less sensitive to pain. To test their hypothesis, they had participants read a description of a target person (accompanied by a random photo) that included several cues to SES (education, job, income, neighbourhood) and to estimate target's pain sensitivity to injuries on the Pain Sensitivity Scale. Half of the participants read descriptions of low-SES individuals, and half read descriptions of high-SES individuals. After conducting the original study, they ran a follow-up study to determine whether the effect generalises to medical professionals. They repeated the study, but with two groups of participants - medical professionals and undergraduate students. All other aspects of the study were the same. Which of the following statements is true about this study (select all that apply)? O a. Results should be analysed in…

SEE MORE QUESTIONS

Recommended textbooks for you

Glencoe Algebra 1, Student Edition, 9780079039897…

Algebra

ISBN:

9780079039897

Author:

Carter

Publisher:

McGraw Hill

Big Ideas Math A Bridge To Success Algebra 1: Stu…

Algebra

ISBN:

9781680331141

Author:

HOUGHTON MIFFLIN HARCOURT

Publisher:

Houghton Mifflin Harcourt

College Algebra (MindTap Course List)

Algebra

ISBN:

9781305652231

Author:

R. David Gustafson, Jeff Hughes

Publisher:

Cengage Learning

Glencoe Algebra 1, Student Edition, 9780079039897…

Algebra

ISBN:

9780079039897

Author:

Carter

Publisher:

McGraw Hill

Big Ideas Math A Bridge To Success Algebra 1: Stu…

Algebra

ISBN:

9781680331141

Author:

HOUGHTON MIFFLIN HARCOURT

Publisher:

Houghton Mifflin Harcourt

College Algebra (MindTap Course List)

Algebra

ISBN:

9781305652231

Author:

R. David Gustafson, Jeff Hughes

Publisher:

Cengage Learning

SEE MORE TEXTBOOKS