Homework Help is Here – Start Your Trial Now!
Math
Statistics
The paper "Deception and Design: The Impact of Communication Technology on Lying Behavior"+ describes an investigation into whether lying is less common in face-to-face communication than in other forms of communication such as phone conversations or e-mail. Participants in this study were 30 students in an upper-division communications course at Cornell University who received course credit for participation. Participants were asked to record all of their social interactions for a week, making note of any lies told. Based on data from these records, the authors of the paper concluded that students lie more often in phone conversations than in face-to-face conversations and more often in face-to-face conversations than in e-mail. Discuss the limitations of this study, commenting on the way the sample was selected and potential sources of bias. (Select all that apply.) Students knew that they were surveying themselves as to the truthfulness of their interactions, which could have changed students behavior and distorted the results of the study. Since the students were all from an upper-division communications course at Cornell, it is not reasonable to consider these students to be representative of all students. The study only asked 30 students, instead of the whole class. Students may not have admitted all the lies they told, which would distort the results of the study. Participants were asked to record all of their social interactions for a week, instead of a month.

The paper "Deception and Design: The Impact of Communication Technology on Lying Behavior"+ describes an investigation into whether lying is less common in face-to-face communication than in other forms of communication such as phone conversations or e-mail. Participants in this study were 30 students in an upper-division communications course at Cornell University who received course credit for participation. Participants were asked to record all of their social interactions for a week, making note of any lies told. Based on data from these records, the authors of the paper concluded that students lie more often in phone conversations than in face-to-face conversations and more often in face-to-face conversations than in e-mail. Discuss the limitations of this study, commenting on the way the sample was selected and potential sources of bias. (Select all that apply.) Students knew that they were surveying themselves as to the truthfulness of their interactions, which could have changed students behavior and distorted the results of the study. Since the students were all from an upper-division communications course at Cornell, it is not reasonable to consider these students to be representative of all students. The study only asked 30 students, instead of the whole class. Students may not have admitted all the lies they told, which would distort the results of the study. Participants were asked to record all of their social interactions for a week, instead of a month.

MATLAB: An Introduction with Applications
MATLAB: An Introduction with Applications
6th Edition
ISBN:9781119256830
Author:Amos Gilat
Publisher:Amos Gilat
Chapter1: Starting With Matlab
Section: Chapter Questions
Problem 1P
See similar textbooks
icon
Related questions
Question
The paper "Deception and Design: The Impact of Communication Technology on Lying Behavior"+ describes an investigation into whether lying is less common in face-to-face communication than in other forms of communication such as phone conversations or e-mail. Participants in this study were 30 students in an upper-division communications course at Cornell University who received course credit for participation. Participants were asked to record all of their social interactions for a week, making note of any lies told. Based on data from these records, the authors of the paper concluded that students lie more often in phone conversations than in face-to-face conversations and more often in face-to-face conversations than in e-mail. Discuss the limitations of this study, commenting on the way the sample was selected and potential sources of bias. (Select all that apply.) O Students knew that they were surveying themselves as to the truthfulness of their interactions, which could have changed students behavior and distorted the results of the study. O Since the students were all from an upper-division communications course at Cornell, it is not reasonable to consider these students to be representative of all students. O The study only asked 30 students, instead of the whole class. Students may not have admitted all the lies they told, which would distort the results of the study. Participants were asked to record all of their social interactions for a week, instead of a month.
Transcribed Image Text:The paper "Deception and Design: The Impact of Communication Technology on Lying Behavior"+ describes an investigation into whether lying is less common in face-to-face communication than in other forms of communication such as phone conversations or e-mail. Participants in this study were 30 students in an upper-division communications course at Cornell University who received course credit for participation. Participants were asked to record all of their social interactions for a week, making note of any lies told. Based on data from these records, the authors of the paper concluded that students lie more often in phone conversations than in face-to-face conversations and more often in face-to-face conversations than in e-mail. Discuss the limitations of this study, commenting on the way the sample was selected and potential sources of bias. (Select all that apply.) O Students knew that they were surveying themselves as to the truthfulness of their interactions, which could have changed students behavior and distorted the results of the study. O Since the students were all from an upper-division communications course at Cornell, it is not reasonable to consider these students to be representative of all students. O The study only asked 30 students, instead of the whole class. Students may not have admitted all the lies they told, which would distort the results of the study. Participants were asked to record all of their social interactions for a week, instead of a month.
Expert Solution
trending now

Trending now

This is a popular solution!

steps

Step by step

Solved in 3 steps

SEE SOLUTIONCheck out a sample Q&A here
Blurred answer
Similar questions
Recommended textbooks for you
MATLAB: An Introduction with Applications
MATLAB: An Introduction with Applications
Statistics
ISBN:
9781119256830
Author:
Amos Gilat
Publisher:
John Wiley & Sons Inc
Probability and Statistics for Engineering and th…
Probability and Statistics for Engineering and th…
Statistics
ISBN:
9781305251809
Author:
Jay L. Devore
Publisher:
Cengage Learning
Statistics for The Behavioral Sciences (MindTap C…
Statistics for The Behavioral Sciences (MindTap C…
Statistics
ISBN:
9781305504912
Author:
Frederick J Gravetter, Larry B. Wallnau
Publisher:
Cengage Learning
Elementary Statistics: Picturing the World (7th E…
Elementary Statistics: Picturing the World (7th E…
Statistics
ISBN:
9780134683416
Author:
Ron Larson, Betsy Farber
Publisher:
PEARSON
The Basic Practice of Statistics
The Basic Practice of Statistics
Statistics
ISBN:
9781319042578
Author:
David S. Moore, William I. Notz, Michael A. Fligner
Publisher:
W. H. Freeman
Introduction to the Practice of Statistics
Introduction to the Practice of Statistics
Statistics
ISBN:
9781319013387
Author:
David S. Moore, George P. McCabe, Bruce A. Craig
Publisher:
W. H. Freeman
SEE MORE TEXTBOOKS