7. Using a payoff matrix to determine the equilibrium outcome Suppose that Flashfry and Warmbreeze are the only two firms in a hypothetical market that produce and sell air fryers. The following payoff matrix gives profit scenarios for each company (in millions of dollars), depending on whether it chooses to set a high or low price for fryers. Flashfry Pricing Warmbreeze Pricing High Low High 11,11 3,15 Low 15,3 9,9 For example, the lower-left cell shows that if Flashfry prices low and Warmbreeze prices high, Flashfry will earn a profit of $15 million, and Warmbreeze will earn a profit of $3 million. Assume this is a simultaneous game and that Flashfry and Warmbreeze are both profit-maximizing firms. price, and if Flashfry prices low, Warmbreeze will make more profit if it If Flashfry prices high, Warmbreeze will make more profit if it chooses a chooses a price. If Warmbreeze prices high, Flashfry will make more profit if it chooses a price, and if Warmbreeze prices low, Flashfry will make more profit if it chooses a price. Considering all of the information given, pricing low a dominant strategy for both Flashfry and Warmbreeze.

7. Using a payoff matrix to determine the equilibrium outcome Suppose that Flashfry and Warmbreeze are the only two firms in a hypothetical market that produce and sell air fryers. The following payoff matrix gives profit scenarios for each company (in millions of dollars), depending on whether it chooses to set a high or low price for fryers. Flashfry Pricing Warmbreeze Pricing High Low High 11,11 3,15 Low 15,3 9,9 For example, the lower-left cell shows that if Flashfry prices low and Warmbreeze prices high, Flashfry will earn a profit of $15 million, and Warmbreeze will earn a profit of $3 million. Assume this is a simultaneous game and that Flashfry and Warmbreeze are both profit-maximizing firms. price, and if Flashfry prices low, Warmbreeze will make more profit if it If Flashfry prices high, Warmbreeze will make more profit if it chooses a chooses a price. If Warmbreeze prices high, Flashfry will make more profit if it chooses a price, and if Warmbreeze prices low, Flashfry will make more profit if it chooses a price. Considering all of the information given, pricing low a dominant strategy for both Flashfry and Warmbreeze.

ENGR.ECONOMIC ANALYSIS

14th Edition

ISBN:9780190931919

Author:NEWNAN

Publisher:NEWNAN

Chapter1: Making Economics Decisions

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 1QTC

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

1. Two firms (A and B) play a competition game (i.e. Cournot) in which they can choose any Qi from 0 to ¥. The firms have the same cost functions C(Qi) = 10Qi + 0.5Qi2, and thus MCi = 10 + Qi. They face a market demand curve of P = 220 – (QA + QB). a. Assume firm A chooses quantity first. Frim B observes this choice and then chooses its own quantity. What is Frim B's profit as a function of QA and QB? b. Firm B has MRB = 220 – 2QB – QA. What is firm B’s best response to an arbitrary QA selected by firm A? c. Given that firm A expects firm B’s best response, what is firm A’s profit as a function of QA? (Hint: the only unknown variable in the profit function should be QA) d. Firm A has MRA = 150 – 4QA/3. What are the equilibrium QA and QB selected in this game? e. What is the equilibrium price, and how much profit does each firm collect?
6. Consider the simultaneous move pricing game below. Which of the following statements is true concerning this game? a. The game has a dominant strategy (DSSC) solution b. The game has an iterated dominance (IESDS) solution c. The game has more than 1 Nash equilibrium d. None of the above statements are true Firm A Firm B H M L H 30,30 38,12 33,0 M 11,34 18,14 23,1 L 2,24 6,17 14,8
First 4 blanks: high/low Last blank: is not/is
8. Two firms, the only firms in the market, sell the same product and have the same marginal cost. They realise they would be better off if they didn't compete with each other. They enter an alternating offers bargaining game to decide how they will divide the monopoly profit, n. They have three periods to come to an agreement. If no agreement is reached after three periods, the firms will compete simultaneously in prices. The firms toss a coin to decide who makes the first offer in the bargaining game. Firm 1 wins and decides to go first. Each firm has a discount factor o. a) Draw the game tree. b) What is the subgame perfect equilibrium when 8 = 0.5? c) What is the equilibrium payoff for each firm? d) Was Firm 1 wise to opt to make the first offer? Explain your answer. %3D
The payoff matrix in the figure to the right shows the payoffs for a pricing game. If you were firm A, which strategy would you choose? Firm A should A. price high because this is their maximin strategy. B. price low because this is their tit-for-tat strategy. C. price high because this is their dominant strategy. D. price low because this is their dominant strategy. E. price low because this maximizes profits of both firms. Firm B's dominant strategy is to price If this game were repeated a large number of times and you were firm A and you could change your strategy, what might you do? Firm A should O A. use a tit-for-tat strategy by responding in kind to firm B's play. B. use a maximin strategy by maximizing the minimum gain that can be earned. C. use a tit-for-tat strategy by selecting a price that minimizes firm B's profits. D. use a maximin strategy by by responding in kind to firm B's play. E. use a tit-for-tat strategy by maximizing the minimum gain that can be earned. C Price…
◄ Search 12:47 PM Sun Nov 12 ← Note Nov 12, 2023 Uptown's price strategy The Nash equilibrium occurs when High Low LED RareAir's price strategy High $12 $15 The more favorable outcome would be for $12 Tt ✪ $6 B Low $6 D $8. $15 $8 S O both firms have an incentive to deviate from this strategy given the strategy of the competing firm. It is shown by the dominant strategy of cell A. 92% neither firm has an incentive to deviate from this strategy given the strategy of the competing firm. It is shown by the dominant strategy of cell D. O one firm consistently has an incentive to deviate from this strategy given the strategy of the competing firm. It is shown by the high-price strategy of cell B. O one firm consistently has an incentive to deviate from this strategy given the strategy of the competing firm. It is shown by the high-price strategy of cell C. O the firms to collude and use the high-price strategy but this strategy requires cooperation. O one firm to take the lead and let the…
QUESTION 13 Consider a market where two firms (1 and 2) produce differentiated goods and compete in prices. The demand for firm 1 is given by D₁(P₁, P2) = 140 - 2p1 + P2 and demand for firm 2's product is D2 (P1, P2) 140 - 2p2 + P1 Both firms have a constant marginal cost of 20. What is the Nash equilibrium price of firm 1? (Only give a full number; if necessary, round to the lower integer; no dollar sign.)
Consider the payoff matrix below representing two firms engaged in Bertrand Competition. Firm A is player 1 and Firm B is player 2. High price Low price High price 10, 12 -1, 13 Low price 12, 2 0, 3 What is Firm A's dominant strategy? Question 14Answer a. High price b. Low price c. Firm A does not have a dominant strategy
6. Using a payoff matrix to determine the equilibrium outcome Suppose that Zipride and Citron are the only two firms in a hypothetical market that produce and sell electric scooters. The following payoff matrix gives profit scenarios for each company (in millions of dollars), depending on whether it chooses to set a high or low price for scooters. Zipride Pricing price. High Low For example, the lower-left cell shows that if Zipride prices low and Citron prices high, Zipride will earn a profit of $13 million, and Citron will earn a profit of $3 million. Assume this is a simultaneous game and that Zipride and Citron are both profit-maximizing firms. Citron Pricing High 9,9 13, 3 If Zipride prices high, Citron will make more profit if it chooses a Low If the firms do not lude, 3, 13 6, 6 If Citron prices high, Zipride will make more profit if it chooses a price. Considering all of the information given, pricing low True False Both Zipride and Citron will choose a low price. strategies…
Consider the payoff matrix below representing two firms engaged in Bertrand Competition. Firm A is player 1 and Firm B is player 2. High price Low price High price 10, 12 -1, 13 Low price 12, 2 0, 3 What is Firm A's dominant strategy? Question 14Answer a. High price b. Low price c. Firm A does not have a dominant strategy
2. Consider the following game: Soapy Inc. and Suddies Inc. are the only producers of soap powder. They collude and agree to share the market equally. If neither firm cheats on the agreement, each makes $1 million profit. If either firm cheats, the cheat makes a profit of $1.5 million, while the complier incurs a loss of $0.5 million. If both cheat, they break even. Neither firm can monitor the other's actions. a) Construct the payoff matrix. b) What is the dominant strategy? c) What is the nash equilibrium for this game?
8)Consider a market in which 5 companies operate, whose marginal and average costs are equal to c. The demand function is given by P(Q)= 1-Q, where P is the price and Q indicates the total quantity. Assume that companies compete with Cournot in choosing production levels. Assume that the game is repeated an infinite number of periods, that companies adopt trigger strategies and that the punishment is represented by Nash Reversion. 1)What is the value of the discount factor that allows companies to sustain tacit collusion in a balanced situation? 2) Assume now that companies are able to discover the defection of a rival company with K periods of delay. What do you think the effect on the sustainability of collusion can be? 3) Do you think that in this market collusion would be more easily sustainable if the companies compete with Bertrand? 4) If in a price-competitive market (Bertrand) N symmetrical companies operate, what would be the critical value of the discount factor that would…