47. The figure shows a steady-state microelectrode voltammogram of a neurotransmitter obtained in a solution of 0.1 M KCl at 10 mV/s. Which best describes this voltammogram? Current, i (NA) 20 1.0 0.5 G.D 43 01 00 01 02 03 04 05 Potential, E (V) vs. Ag/AgCl (A) A scan-rate dependent oxidation wave with a cathodic limiting current of 2.0 nA and a standard oxidation potential of 0.20 V vs Ag/AgCl. (B) A scan-rate independent reduction wave with a cathodic limiting current of 2.0 nA and a standard reduction potential of 0.40 V vs Ag/AgCl. (C) A scan-rate independent oxidation wave with an anodic limiting current of 2.0 nA and a standard reduction potential of 0.20 V vs Ag/AgCl. (D) An irreversible scan-rate dependent oxidation wave with an anodic limiting current of 0.0 nA and unable

Chemistry
10th Edition
ISBN:9781305957404
Author:Steven S. Zumdahl, Susan A. Zumdahl, Donald J. DeCoste
Publisher:Steven S. Zumdahl, Susan A. Zumdahl, Donald J. DeCoste
Chapter1: Chemical Foundations
Section: Chapter Questions
Problem 1RQ: Define and explain the differences between the following terms. a. law and theory b. theory and...
icon
Related questions
Question
47. The figure shows a
steady-state
microelectrode
voltammogram of a
neurotransmitter
obtained in a solution
of 0.1 M KCl at 10
mV/s. Which best
describes this
voltammogram?
Current, i (A)
20
1.5
1.0
0.5
G.D
43 01 00 01 02 03 04 05
Potential, E (V) vs. Ag/AgCl
(A) A scan-rate dependent oxidation wave with a
cathodic limiting current of 2.0 nA and a standard
oxidation potential of 0.20 V vs Ag/AgCl.
(B) A scan-rate independent reduction wave with a
cathodic limiting current of 2.0 nA and a standard
reduction potential of 0.40 V vs Ag/AgCl.
(C) A scan-rate independent oxidation wave with an
anodic limiting current of 2.0 nA and a standard
reduction potential of 0.20 V vs Ag/AgCl.
(D) An irreversible scan-rate dependent oxidation wave
with an anodic limiting current of 0.0 nA and unable
to obtain its standard reduction potential with the
information provided
(D) The oxidized species formed in the reaction produce
an insulating layer on the electrode surface.
50. Anodic stripping voltammetry of Li in a Hg nanodroplet
was used for quantifying the amount of Li* that a 10 um
microparticle for a Li-ion battery electrode could store.
The volume of the particle was 1 pl. and the stripping
voltammogram was obtained at 100 mV/s following Li
pre-concentration. The charge for the stripping peak was
85 nC. What was the concentration of Li' in the particle?
200 mV
$ 8
Current, i (A)
-12
(A) 0.88 µM
(C) 1.76 M
-1.6
-1.8
-1.4
Potential, E (V) vs. Cd(Hg)/Cd²+
(B) 0.88 M
(D) 176 M
-2.0
-22
Transcribed Image Text:47. The figure shows a steady-state microelectrode voltammogram of a neurotransmitter obtained in a solution of 0.1 M KCl at 10 mV/s. Which best describes this voltammogram? Current, i (A) 20 1.5 1.0 0.5 G.D 43 01 00 01 02 03 04 05 Potential, E (V) vs. Ag/AgCl (A) A scan-rate dependent oxidation wave with a cathodic limiting current of 2.0 nA and a standard oxidation potential of 0.20 V vs Ag/AgCl. (B) A scan-rate independent reduction wave with a cathodic limiting current of 2.0 nA and a standard reduction potential of 0.40 V vs Ag/AgCl. (C) A scan-rate independent oxidation wave with an anodic limiting current of 2.0 nA and a standard reduction potential of 0.20 V vs Ag/AgCl. (D) An irreversible scan-rate dependent oxidation wave with an anodic limiting current of 0.0 nA and unable to obtain its standard reduction potential with the information provided (D) The oxidized species formed in the reaction produce an insulating layer on the electrode surface. 50. Anodic stripping voltammetry of Li in a Hg nanodroplet was used for quantifying the amount of Li* that a 10 um microparticle for a Li-ion battery electrode could store. The volume of the particle was 1 pl. and the stripping voltammogram was obtained at 100 mV/s following Li pre-concentration. The charge for the stripping peak was 85 nC. What was the concentration of Li' in the particle? 200 mV $ 8 Current, i (A) -12 (A) 0.88 µM (C) 1.76 M -1.6 -1.8 -1.4 Potential, E (V) vs. Cd(Hg)/Cd²+ (B) 0.88 M (D) 176 M -2.0 -22
Expert Solution
steps

Step by step

Solved in 5 steps

Blurred answer
Knowledge Booster
Electroanalytical Techniques
Learn more about
Need a deep-dive on the concept behind this application? Look no further. Learn more about this topic, chemistry and related others by exploring similar questions and additional content below.
Similar questions
  • SEE MORE QUESTIONS
Recommended textbooks for you
Chemistry
Chemistry
Chemistry
ISBN:
9781305957404
Author:
Steven S. Zumdahl, Susan A. Zumdahl, Donald J. DeCoste
Publisher:
Cengage Learning
Chemistry
Chemistry
Chemistry
ISBN:
9781259911156
Author:
Raymond Chang Dr., Jason Overby Professor
Publisher:
McGraw-Hill Education
Principles of Instrumental Analysis
Principles of Instrumental Analysis
Chemistry
ISBN:
9781305577213
Author:
Douglas A. Skoog, F. James Holler, Stanley R. Crouch
Publisher:
Cengage Learning
Organic Chemistry
Organic Chemistry
Chemistry
ISBN:
9780078021558
Author:
Janice Gorzynski Smith Dr.
Publisher:
McGraw-Hill Education
Chemistry: Principles and Reactions
Chemistry: Principles and Reactions
Chemistry
ISBN:
9781305079373
Author:
William L. Masterton, Cecile N. Hurley
Publisher:
Cengage Learning
Elementary Principles of Chemical Processes, Bind…
Elementary Principles of Chemical Processes, Bind…
Chemistry
ISBN:
9781118431221
Author:
Richard M. Felder, Ronald W. Rousseau, Lisa G. Bullard
Publisher:
WILEY