1) Perform an ethical analysis of Facebook. What is the ethical dilemma presented by this case?
2) What is the relationship of privacy to Facebook’s business model?
3) Describe the weaknesses of Facebook’s privacy policies and features. What people, organization, and technology factors have contributed to those weaknesses?
4) Will Facebook be able to have a successful business model without invading privacy? Explain your answer. Could Facebook take any measures to make this possible?
Transcribed Image Text: Business Problem-Solving Case
FACEBOOK PRIVACY: WHAT PRIVACY?
In less than a decade, Facebook has morphed from a
small, niche networking site for mostly Ivy League
college students into a publicly traded company with
a market worth of $338 billion in 2016. Facebook
boasts that it is free to join and always will be, so
where's the money coming from to service 1.65 billion
Chapter 4 Ethical and Social Issues in Information Systems 187
worldwide subscribers? Just like its fellow tech titan
and in short, just about all things you are interested
in more easily. These are the reasons so many people
use Facebook-it provides value to users.
and rival Google, Facebook's revenue comes almost
entirely from advertising. Facebook does not have a
diverse array of hot new gadgets like Apple does, a
global network of brick-and-mortar retail outlets like
Walmart does, or a full inventory of software for sale.
However, Facebook's goal is to get its users to
share as much data as possible because the more
All Facebook has to sell is your personal information
and the information of hundreds of millions of others
Facebook knows about you, the more accurately
it can serve relevant advertisements to you.
book CEO Mark Zuckerberg often says that people
Face-
with Facebook accounts.
Advertisers have long understood the value of
Facebook's unprecedented trove of personal informa-
tion. They can serve ads using highly specific details
such as relationship status, location, employment
status, favorite books, movies, or TV shows and a
want the world to be more open and connected. It's
unclear whether that is truly the case, but it is cer-
tainly true that Facebook wants the world to be more
open and connected because it stands to make more
money in that world. Critics of Facebook are con-
cerned that the existence of a repository of personal
data of the size that Facebook has amassed requires
protections and privacy controls that extend far
beyond those that Facebook currently offers.
Facebook wanting to make more money is under-
standable, but the company has a checkered past of
privacy
whether it should be responsible for the personal data
of hundreds of millions of people. There are no laws
in the
host of other categories. For example, an Atlanta
woman who posts that she has become engaged
might be offered an ad for a wedding photogra-
pher on her Facebook page. When advertisements
are served to finely targeted subsets of users, the
response is much more successful than traditional
types of advertising.
A growing number of companies both big and
small have taken notice. In 2015, Facebook generated
$17.9 billion in revenue, 94 percent of which ($16.8
violations and missteps that raise doubts about
United States that give consumers the right to
know what data com
panies like Facebook have com-
billion) was from selling ads and the remainder from
selling games and virtual goods. Facebook's revenues
piled. You can challenge information in credit reports,
but you can't even see what data Facebook has gath-
but:
ered about you, let alone try to change it. It's different
it. It's
in 2015 grew by 43 percent over the previous year,
driven mostly by adding new users and showing 40
percent more ads than a year earlier. A major con-
tributor to revenue growth in 2015 is ads sold in the
You can
in Europe: you can request Facebook to turn over a
report of all the information it has about you.
More than ever, your every move, every click, on
social networks is being used by outside entities to
mobile News Feed.
assess your interests and behavior and then pitch
nforce.
That was good news for Facebook, which is
you an ad based on this knowledge. Law enforce-
ment agencies use social networks to gather evi-
dence on tax evaders and other criminals: emplovers
expected to continue to increase its revenue in com-
ing years, but is it good news for you, the Facebook
user? More than ever, companies such as Facebook
and Google, which made approximately $67 billion
in advertising revenue in 2015, are using your online
activity to develop a frighteningly accurate picture of
your life. Facebook's goal is to serve advertisements
that are more relevant to you than anywhere else
on the web, but the personal information it gathers
about you both with and without your consent can
also be used against you in other ways.
Facebook has a diverse array of compelling and
useful features. Facebook's partnership with the
Department of Labor helps connect job seekers and
employers; Facebook has helped families find lost
pets; Facebook allows active-duty soldiers to stay in
touch with their families; it gives smaller companies a
chance to further their e-commerce efforts and larger
companies a chance to solidify their brands; and, per-
haps most obviously, Facebook allows you to keep in
touch with your friends, relatives, local restaurants,
use social networks to make decisions about prospec-
tive candidates for jobs; and data aggregators are
gathering as much information about you as they can
sell to the highest bidder. Facebook has admitted that
it uses a software bug or code to track users across
the Internet even if they are not using Facebook.
Think you own your face? Febook's newest pri-
vacy issue involves its facial recognition software
used for
photo tagging of users. This "tag sugges-
tions" feature is automatically on when you sign up,
and there is no user consent. A federal court in 2016
allowed a lawsuit to go forward contesting Facebook's
right to photo tag without user consent. This feature
is in violation of several state laws that seek to secure
the privacy of biometric data.
A recent Consumer Reports study found that of
150 million Americans on Facebook, ever day, at
least 4.8 million are willingly sharing information
188 Part One Organizations, Management, and the Networked Enterprise
that could be used against them in some way. That
includes plans to travel on a particular day, which
burglars could use to time robberies, or Liking a page
about a particular health condition or treatment,
of users' personal information. Facebook was charged
with deceiving its users by telling them they could
keep their information on Facebook private but then
repeatedly allowing it to be shared and made public.
Facebook agreed to obtain user consent before mak-
ing any change to that user's privacy preferences and
to submit to biannual privacy audits by an indepen-
dent firm for the next 20 years.
which insurers could use to deny coverage. Thirteen
million users have never adjusted Facebook's privacy
controls, which allow friends using Facebook appli-
cations to transfer your data unwittingly to a third
party without your knowledge.
Credit card companies and similar organizations
have begun engaging in weblining, taken from the
phrase redlining, by altering their treatment of you
Privacy advocate groups such as the Electronic
Privacy Information Center (EPIC) want Facebook
to restore its more robust privacy settings from 2009
as well as to offer complete access to all data it keeps
based on the actions of other people with profiles
similar to yours. Employers can assess your personal-
ity and behavior
survey, 93 percent of people polled believe that Inter-
about its users. Facebook has also come under fire
from EPIC for collecting information about users who
are not even logged on to Facebook or may not even
have accounts on Facebook. Facebook keeps track of
activity on other sites that have Like buttons
ommendations widgets and records the time of your
by using your Facebook likes, In one
net companies should be forced to ask for
before using your personal information, and 72 per-
cent want the ability to opt out of online tracking.
permission
or rec-
visit and your IP address when you visit a site with
those features, regardless of whether you click them.
Why, then, do so many people share sensitive
details of their life on Facebook? Often it's because
Although U.S. Facebook users have little recourse
users do not realize that their data are being col-
lected and transmitted in this way. A Facebook user's
to access data that Facebook has collected on them,
have
users from other countries have made inroads in
friends are not notified if information about them is
collected by that user's applications. Many of Face-
book's features and services are enabled by default
when they are launched without notifying users,
and a study by Siegel + Gale found that Facebook's
privacy policy is more difficult to comprehend than
government notices or typical bank credit card agree-
ments, which are notoriously dense. Did you know
that whenever you log into a website using Facebook,
Facebook shares some personal information with
that site, and can track your movements in that site.
Next time you visit Facebook, click Privacy Settings
and see whether you can understand your options.
Facebook's value and growth potential are deter-
mined by how effectively it can leverage the personal
this regard. In Europe, over 100,000 Facebook users
have already requested their data, and European
law requires Facebook to respond to these requests
within 40 days. Government privacy regulators from
France, Spain, Italy, Germany, Belgium, and the
Netherlands have been actively investigating Face-
book's privacy controls as the European Union pur-
sues more stringent privacy protection legislation, In
June 2015, Belgium's data-protection watchdog sued
Facebook over privacy practices such as how Face-
book tracks users across the web through Like and
Share buttons on external websites. In 2016 an Aus-
trian student's class-action suit against Facebook's
privacy rules has been referred to the European
Court of Justice. The suit alleges Facebook's privacy
Transcribed Image Text: that whenever you log into a website using Facebook,
Facebook shares some personal information with
that site, and can track your movements in that site.
Next time you visit Facebook, click Privacy Settings
and see whether you can understand your options.
Facebook's value and growth potential are deter-
mined by how effectively it can leverage the personal
data it aggregated about its users to attract advertisers.
Facebook also stands to gain from managing and avoid-
ing the privacy concerns its users and government
regulators raise. For Facebook users who value the pri-
June 2015, Belgium's data-protection watchdog sued
Facebook over privacy practices such as how Face-
book tracks users across the web through Like and
Share buttons on external websites. In 2016 an Aus-
trian student's class-action suit against Facebook's
privacy rules has been referred to the European
Court of Justice. The suit alleges Facebook's privacy
policies violate European data protection laws.
In January 2014, Facebook shut down its Spon-
sored Stories feature, which served advertisements in
the user's news feed highlighting products and busi-
vacy of their personal data, this situation appears grim,
but there are some signs that Facebook might become
more responsible with its data collection processes,
whether by its own volition or because it is forced to
do so. As a publicly traded company, Facebook now
invites more scrutiny from investors and regulators
because, unlike in the past, its balance sheets, assets,
and financial reporting documents are readily available.
In August 2012, Facebook settled a lawsuit with
the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) in which it was
barred from misrepresenting the privacy or security
nesses that Facebook friends were using. Sponsored
Stories had been one of the most effective forms of
advertising on Facebook because they don't seem like
advertisements at all to most users. However, this fea-
ture triggered many lawsuits, attempted settlements,
and criticism from privacy groups, the FTC, and
annoyed parents whose children's photos were being
used throughout Facebook to sell products.
Although Facebook has shut down one of its
more egregious privacy-invading features, the com-
pany's Data Use policies make it very clear that,
Chapter 4 Ethical and Social Issues in Information Systems 189
as a condition of using the service, users grant the
company wide latitude in using their information in
advertising. This includes a person's name, photo,
comments, and other information. Facebook's exist-
ing policies make clear that users are required to
use policy. That policy declares very openly that if
you use Facebook, you don't have any privacy with
respect to any data you provide to it.
Sources: Samuel Gibbs, "WhatsApp, Facebook and Google Face
Tough New Privacy Rules Under EC Proposal," The Guardian, Jan-
uary 10, 2017; Stephanie Bodoni, “Google, Facebook Face Tighter
EU Grip With New Privacy Law," Bloomberg News, January 10,
2017; Hannah Kuchler and Duncan Robinson, "Facebook Privacy
Case Referred to Europe's Top Court," Financial Times, September
16, 2016; "Privacy Shield' the New Deal Governing How Europe's
User Data Is Sent to the US," Reuters, February 29, 2016; Katie
Collins, "Facebook's Newest Privacy Problem: 'Faceprint' Data,"
CNET, May 16, 2016; United States District Court Northern Dis-
trict of California in Re Facebook Biometric Information Privacy
Litigation. Case No. 15-cv-03747-JD Order Re Motion to Dismiss
and Summary Judgment, May 6, 2016; Jessica Guynn, "Facebook
to Face Privacy Lawsuit over Photo Tagging," USA Today, May 6,
2016; Natasha Singer, “Sharing Data, but Not Happily," New York
Times, June 4, 2015; Sam Schechner and Natalia Drozdiak, "Bel-
gium Takes Facebook to Court over Privacy, User Tracking," Wall
Street Journal, June 16, 2015; Deepa Seethharaman, "At Facebook
Summit, Little Consensus on Privacy," New York Times, June 4,
2015; Zeynep Tufecki, "Let Me Pay for Facebook," New York Times,
June, 4, 2015; IBM, "IBM and Facebook Team Up to Deliver Per-
sonalized Brand Experiences through People-Based Marketing,"
press release, May 6, 2015; Lisa Fleisher, "Admitting Tracking Bug,
Facebook Defends European Privacy Practices," Wall Street Journal,
April 9, 2015; Facebook, Inc., SEC Form 10K filed with the Securi-
ties and Exchange Commission for the fiscal year ending Decem-
ber 31, 2014, January 29, 2015; Anna North, "How Your Facebook
Likes Could Cost You a Job," New York Times, January 20, 2015;
grant the company wide permission to use their
personal information in advertising as a condition of
using the service. This includes social advertising, by
which your personal information is broadcast to your
friends and, indeed, the entire Facebook service if
the company sees fit. Although users can limit some
uses, an advanced degree in Facebook data features
is required.
Ad-based firms like Facebook, and hundreds of
others, including Google, justify their collection of
personal information by arguing that consumers, by
virtue of using the service, implicitly know about the
data collection efforts and the role of advertisers in
paying for the service and must, therefore, believe
they are receiving real economic value from ads.
This line of reasoning received a blow when in June
2015, researchers at the Annenberg School of Com-
munication at the University of Pennsylvania found
that 65 percent of Americans feel they have lost con-
trol over their information to advertisers, 84 percent
want to control their information, and 91 percent do
not believe it is fair for companies to offer discounts
or coupons in exchange for their personal informa-
tion without their knowledge.
In June 2015, Facebook held its first ever privacy
Natasha Singer, “Didn't Read Those Terms of Service? Here's What
You Agreed to Give Up," New York Times, April 28, 2014.
CASE STUDY QUESTIONS
4-13 Perform an ethical analysis of Facebook. What
is the ethical dilemma presented by this case?
conference as part of a growing effort to convince
users it really is concerned about privacy and aware
of public criticism of the firm. It has hired more than
50 privacy experts focused on Facebook's privacy
practices. Critics asked Facebook why it doesn't offer
an ad-free service–like music streaming sites-for
4-14 What is the relationship of privacy to Face-
book's business model?
4-15 Describe the weaknesses of Facebook's privacy
policies and features. What people, organiza-
tion, and technology factors have contributed
to those weaknesses?
a monthly fee. Others wanted to know why Face-
book does not allow users just to opt out of tracking.
But these kinds of changes would be very difficult
for Facebook because its business model depends
4-16 Will Facebook be able to have a successful busi-
ness model without invading privacy? Explain
your answer. Could Facebook take any mea-
sures to make this possible?
entirely on the unfettered use of its users' personal
private information, just like it declares in its data
MyLab MIS
Go to the Assignments section of MyLab MIS to complete these writing exercises.
4-17 What are the five principles of Fair Information Practices? For each principle, describe a business situation in
which the principle comes into play and how you think managers should react.
4-18 What are five digital technology trends in American business today that raise ethical issues for business firms
and managers? Provide an example from business or personal experience when an ethical issue resulted from
each of these trends.