11.82 Researchers measured the specific activity of the enzyme sucrase extracted from portions of the intestines of 24 patients who underwent an intestinal bypass. After the sections were extracted, they were homogenized and analyzed for enzyme activity (Carter, 1981). Two different methods can be used to measure the activity of sucrase: the homogenate method and the pellet method. Data for the 24 patients are shown here for the two methods: Sucrase Activity as Measured by the Homogenate and Pellet Methods Patient Homogenate Method, y Pellet Method, x 1 18.88 70.00 2 7 .26 55.43 3 6.50 18.87 4 9.83 40.41 5 46.05 57 .43 6 20.10 31.14 7 35.78 70.10 8 59.42 137 .56 9 58.43 221.20 10 62.32 276.43 11 88.53 316.00 12 19.50 75.56 13 60.78 277 .30 14 77 .92 331.50 15 51.29 133.74 16 77 .91 221.50 17 36.65 132.93 18 31.17 85.38 19 66.09 142.34 20 115.15 294.63 21 95.88 262.52 22 64.61 183.56 23 37 .71 86.12 24 100.82 226.55 a. Produce a scatterplot of the data. Might a linear model adequately describe the relationship between the two methods? b. Produce a residual plot. Are there any potential problems uncovered by the plot? c. In general, the pellet method is more time consuming than the homogenate method, yet it provides a more accurate measure of sucrase activity. How might you estimate the pellet reading based on a particular homogenate reading? d. How would you develop a confidence (prediction) interval about your point estimate?

MATLAB: An Introduction with Applications
6th Edition
ISBN:9781119256830
Author:Amos Gilat
Publisher:Amos Gilat
Chapter1: Starting With Matlab
Section: Chapter Questions
Problem 1P
icon
Related questions
Topic Video
Question

11.82 Researchers measured the specific activity of the enzyme sucrase extracted from portions of the intestines of 24 patients who underwent an intestinal bypass. After the sections were extracted, they were homogenized and analyzed for enzyme activity (Carter, 1981). Two different methods can be used to measure the activity of sucrase: the homogenate method and the pellet method. Data for the 24 patients are shown here for the two methods:

Sucrase Activity as Measured by the Homogenate and
Pellet Methods
Patient Homogenate Method, y Pellet Method, x
1 18.88 70.00
2 7 .26 55.43
3 6.50 18.87
4 9.83 40.41
5 46.05 57 .43
6 20.10 31.14
7 35.78 70.10
8 59.42 137 .56
9 58.43 221.20
10 62.32 276.43

11 88.53 316.00
12 19.50 75.56
13 60.78 277 .30
14 77 .92 331.50
15 51.29 133.74
16 77 .91 221.50
17 36.65 132.93
18 31.17 85.38
19 66.09 142.34
20 115.15 294.63
21 95.88 262.52
22 64.61 183.56
23 37 .71 86.12
24 100.82 226.55
a. Produce a scatterplot of the data. Might a linear model adequately describe the relationship between the two methods?
b. Produce a residual plot. Are there any potential problems uncovered by the plot?
c. In general, the pellet method is more time consuming than the homogenate method, yet it provides a more accurate measure of sucrase activity. How might you estimate the pellet reading based on a particular homogenate reading?
d. How would you develop a confidence (prediction) interval about your point estimate?

Sucrase Activity as Measured by the Homogenate
and Pellet Methods
Patient
Homogenate Method, y
Pellet Method, x
11
88.53
316.00
12
19.50
75.56
13
60.78
277.30
14
77.92
331.50
15
51.29
133.74
16
77.91
221.50
17
36.65
132.93
18
31.17
85.38
19
66.09
142.34
20
115.15
294.63
21
95.88
262.52
22
64.61
183.56
23
37.71
86.12
24
100.82
226.55
a. Produce a scatterplot of the data. Might a linear model adequately describe the
relationship between the two methods?
b. Produce a residual plot. Are there any potential problems uncovered by the plot?
c. In general, the pellet method is more time consuming than the homogenate
method, yet it provides a more accurate measure of sucrase activity. How might
you estimate the pellet reading based on a particular homogenate reading?
d. How would you develop a confidence (prediction) interval about your point
estimate?
Transcribed Image Text:Sucrase Activity as Measured by the Homogenate and Pellet Methods Patient Homogenate Method, y Pellet Method, x 11 88.53 316.00 12 19.50 75.56 13 60.78 277.30 14 77.92 331.50 15 51.29 133.74 16 77.91 221.50 17 36.65 132.93 18 31.17 85.38 19 66.09 142.34 20 115.15 294.63 21 95.88 262.52 22 64.61 183.56 23 37.71 86.12 24 100.82 226.55 a. Produce a scatterplot of the data. Might a linear model adequately describe the relationship between the two methods? b. Produce a residual plot. Are there any potential problems uncovered by the plot? c. In general, the pellet method is more time consuming than the homogenate method, yet it provides a more accurate measure of sucrase activity. How might you estimate the pellet reading based on a particular homogenate reading? d. How would you develop a confidence (prediction) interval about your point estimate?
11.82 Researchers measured the specific activity of the enzyme sucrase extracted from portions
of the intestines of 24 patients who underwent an intestinal bypass. After the sections were
extracted, they were homogenized and analyzed for enzyme activity (Carter, 1981). Two different
methods can be used to measure the activity of sucrase: the homogenate method and the pellet
method. Data for the 24 patients are shown here for the two methods:
Sucrase Activity as Measured by the Homogenate and
Pellet Methods
Patient
Homogenate Method, y
Pellet Method, x
1
18.88
70.00
2
7.26
55.43
3
6.50
18.87
4
9.83
40.41
5
46.05
57.43
6.
20.10
31.14
7
35.78
70.10
8
59.42
137.56
9.
58.43
221.20
10
62.32
276.43
(continued)
Transcribed Image Text:11.82 Researchers measured the specific activity of the enzyme sucrase extracted from portions of the intestines of 24 patients who underwent an intestinal bypass. After the sections were extracted, they were homogenized and analyzed for enzyme activity (Carter, 1981). Two different methods can be used to measure the activity of sucrase: the homogenate method and the pellet method. Data for the 24 patients are shown here for the two methods: Sucrase Activity as Measured by the Homogenate and Pellet Methods Patient Homogenate Method, y Pellet Method, x 1 18.88 70.00 2 7.26 55.43 3 6.50 18.87 4 9.83 40.41 5 46.05 57.43 6. 20.10 31.14 7 35.78 70.10 8 59.42 137.56 9. 58.43 221.20 10 62.32 276.43 (continued)
Expert Solution
trending now

Trending now

This is a popular solution!

steps

Step by step

Solved in 3 steps with 4 images

Blurred answer
Knowledge Booster
Hypothesis Tests and Confidence Intervals for Means
Learn more about
Need a deep-dive on the concept behind this application? Look no further. Learn more about this topic, statistics and related others by exploring similar questions and additional content below.
Similar questions
  • SEE MORE QUESTIONS
Recommended textbooks for you
MATLAB: An Introduction with Applications
MATLAB: An Introduction with Applications
Statistics
ISBN:
9781119256830
Author:
Amos Gilat
Publisher:
John Wiley & Sons Inc
Probability and Statistics for Engineering and th…
Probability and Statistics for Engineering and th…
Statistics
ISBN:
9781305251809
Author:
Jay L. Devore
Publisher:
Cengage Learning
Statistics for The Behavioral Sciences (MindTap C…
Statistics for The Behavioral Sciences (MindTap C…
Statistics
ISBN:
9781305504912
Author:
Frederick J Gravetter, Larry B. Wallnau
Publisher:
Cengage Learning
Elementary Statistics: Picturing the World (7th E…
Elementary Statistics: Picturing the World (7th E…
Statistics
ISBN:
9780134683416
Author:
Ron Larson, Betsy Farber
Publisher:
PEARSON
The Basic Practice of Statistics
The Basic Practice of Statistics
Statistics
ISBN:
9781319042578
Author:
David S. Moore, William I. Notz, Michael A. Fligner
Publisher:
W. H. Freeman
Introduction to the Practice of Statistics
Introduction to the Practice of Statistics
Statistics
ISBN:
9781319013387
Author:
David S. Moore, George P. McCabe, Bruce A. Craig
Publisher:
W. H. Freeman