J7 CRIJ 4395

docx

School

Central Texas College *

*We aren’t endorsed by this school

Course

4395

Subject

Sociology

Date

Apr 3, 2024

Type

docx

Pages

2

Uploaded by ColonelDolphin367

Report
J7: Secondary Deviance 4 4 unread replies. 4 4 replies. Read the article by Rosenbaum (2018). Rosenbaum (2018) Define and explain the secondary deviance hypothesis. Based on the article, the secondary deviance hypothesis posits that the act of suspending students from school may not only fail to deter deviant behavior but could contribute to its escalation over time. This hypothesis suggests that the social consequences of suspension, such as labeling, stigma, and restricted opportunities, may lead to a sense of disconnection from school, exacerbating the likelihood of further deviant behavior. Evidence supporting this hypothesis includes qualitative studies where suspended students and their caregivers report increased disengagement from school post-suspension, along with instances where students do not exhibit improved behavior following suspension. Additionally, parallels drawn between the labeling processes observed in interactions with law enforcement and those in school settings lend further credence to the idea that suspension can perpetuate a cycle of deviance. This theory underscores the importance of considering the broader social ramifications of punitive measures in educational contexts and highlights the need for alternative approaches to address behavioral issues among students (Rosenbaum, 2018). What conclusions did Rosenbaum develop based on this hypothesis? Based on the hypotheses and findings presented in the study, Janet Rosenbaum developed several conclusions regarding the long-term outcomes of school suspension on educational and criminal justice trajectories. The study revealed a negative impact on educational attainment, with suspended youth being less likely to achieve bachelor's degrees or high school diplomas compared to non-suspended peers 12 years after suspension. Additionally, suspended youth showed an increased likelihood of criminal justice involvement, suggesting a propensity for long-term negative outcomes associated with suspension. These findings align with the secondary deviance hypothesis, indicating that suspension may contribute to a cycle of deviant behavior and criminal justice involvement due to social ramifications such as labeling and disengagement from school. Furthermore, the study suggests that the observed negative outcomes are more likely attributable to the suspension itself rather than selection bias, highlighting the need for evidence-based positive discipline approaches in schools to mitigate these long-term consequences and support student's academic success. Overall, Rosenbaum's conclusions emphasize the importance of understanding the broader social implications of
disciplinary actions and implementing strategies to address them effectively. (Rosenbaum, 2018). What are the criminal justice implications of the study? The study on educational and criminal justice outcomes 12 years after school suspension suggests that suspended youth are more likely to be involved in the criminal justice system, including arrest and probation, compared to non-suspended youth. This underscores the long- term consequences of school suspension and supports the secondary deviance hypothesis, implying that punitive disciplinary measures may perpetuate a cycle of deviant behavior and criminal involvement. Policymakers and stakeholders in the criminal justice system should take heed of these findings to implement interventions addressing underlying issues and reduce the likelihood of future criminal behavior among suspended students. Altogether, the study underscores the importance of considering the broader implications of school disciplinary actions on students' life trajectories and their interactions with the criminal justice system (Rosenbaum, 2018). Reference Rosenbaum, J. (2018). Educational and criminal justice outcomes 12 years after school suspension.  Youth & Society 52 (4), 515- 547. https://doi.org/10.1177/0044118x17752208
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
  • Access to all documents
  • Unlimited textbook solutions
  • 24/7 expert homework help