JontueCR

docx

School

Fayetteville State University *

*We aren’t endorsed by this school

Course

5310

Subject

Sociology

Date

Feb 20, 2024

Type

docx

Pages

2

Uploaded by MasterLionPerson973

Report
Multiple theories will be created as time goes on which brings up the need to evaluate theories. The purpose of this is to decide which ones are the most convincing and the relationships the different theories may have with each other (Bohm and Vogel 2015). The first part is explanatory power which includes three parts, generalizability, comprehensiveness, and precision. Generalizability is the ability to look at a crime type and predict when it could happen and why. Comprehensiveness refers to the different parts that affect a crime such as motivation, opportunity, and ability (Bohm and Vogel 2015). Precision refers to whether or not the cause and effect of the crime make sense. For example, if there is enough time from the moment the cause occurs to the time the effect occurs. Testability is another factor involved in evaluating theories. Testability is can the results of the theory be made into an experiment and then can that experiment repeat that test. If the experiment is testable and each test gets consistent results, then that theory is more likely to be convincing. Another step to evaluating theories is empirical validity. This refers to if the theory holds up against attempts to disprove the theory. Those are the three ways to evaluate crime according to the textbook and is important for deciding which theories are most convincing in criminology.    Bohm, R. M., & Vogel, B. (2015). A Primer on Crime and Delinquency Theory. Carolina Academic Press.  Your explanation of evaluating crime theories based on explanatory power, including generalizability, comprehensiveness, and precision, is thorough and well-structured. The emphasis on testability and empirical validity adds a scientific approach to the evaluation process, ensuring theories are not only comprehensive but also verifiable through experimentation and withstand attempts at disproval. This systematic approach, as outlined by Bohm and Vogel (2015), contributes to the robustness of criminological theories. It's evident that a multifaceted evaluation, considering various aspects, is crucial in determining the convincing nature of theories in the field of criminology. Your elaboration on the importance of identifying assumptions behind theories adds depth to the evaluation process. Recognizing the philosophical underpinnings of theories is crucial, as individual beliefs shape perspectives on criminology and influence policy preferences. Your point about understanding others' assumptions to comprehend their reasoning is insightful, highlighting the significance of philosophical alignment in discussions and decision-making. The four standards for evaluating theories, as outlined by Bohm and Vogel, provide a systematic and comprehensive rubric. Explanatory power, parsimony, testability, and empirical validity collectively contribute to assessing the strength and credibility of a theory. Your explanation of these standards enhances the understanding of how theories are scrutinized, emphasizing the need for a well-rounded evaluation that considers various dimensions.
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
  • Access to all documents
  • Unlimited textbook solutions
  • 24/7 expert homework help