The Supreme Court.edited

docx

School

University of Notre Dame *

*We aren’t endorsed by this school

Course

402

Subject

Sociology

Date

Nov 24, 2024

Type

docx

Pages

4

Uploaded by nkimanzi89

Report
The Supreme Court's Decision to End Affirmative Action in Higher Education Name Institution Course Instructor Date
The Supreme Court's Decision to End Affirmative Action in Higher Education The Supreme Court's decision to end Affirmative Action in higher education on June 29, 2023, marks a significant turning point with profound implications for social justice. Originally designed to rectify historical inequalities and promote diversity by providing opportunities for underrepresented minority groups, Affirmative Action aimed to create more inclusive learning environments (Warikoo & Allen 2020). However, the decision to terminate this policy raises concerns about exacerbating existing disparities. Proponents of ending Affirmative Action argue that it sometimes leads to reverse discrimination, disadvantaging individuals from majority groups. They contend that a merit- based approach, where admissions are solely based on individual qualifications, irrespective of demographic factors, fosters fair competition among all applicants. This perspective sees the termination of Affirmative Action as a move toward a more merit-based system, emphasizing equal treatment. On the flip side, critics argue that a purely merit-based system may overlook the broader context of systemic discrimination. Affirmative Action's termination might disproportionately impact minority communities, limiting their access to educational opportunities and perpetuating systemic inequalities. Without proactive measures to address historical disparities, the decision could contribute to a less equitable society, hindering efforts to foster diverse perspectives within academic settings. In conclusion, the termination of Affirmative Action for higher education triggers a nuanced debate on social justice. While proponents advocate for a merit-based system to ensure fairness, opponents emphasize the potential for increased inequality and reduced diversity. Striking a balance that considers both merit and the need for equitable opportunities remains a complex challenge in the pursuit of a fair and inclusive education system that addresses historical
injustices. As the nation grapples with these complexities, it becomes crucial to explore alternative strategies that promote diversity, inclusivity, and fairness in higher education.
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
  • Access to all documents
  • Unlimited textbook solutions
  • 24/7 expert homework help
References Warikoo, N., & Allen, U. (2020). A solution to multiple problems: the origins of affirmative Action in higher education around the world. Studies in Higher Education, 45(12), 2398- 2412..