Discussion Thread-Case Study
docx
keyboard_arrow_up
School
Liberty University *
*We aren’t endorsed by this school
Course
515
Subject
Religion
Date
Feb 20, 2024
Type
docx
Pages
2
Uploaded by LieutenantStarShark38
Interpreting scripture is complicated, and it has been debated for centuries. One of the most asked questions in this discussion centers around whether the intended meaning of the original biblical writer matters in the interpretation of scripture.
I think that it is crucial to know and utilize what the original biblical writer was experiencing in order to properly interpret scripture. Yes, we still apply scripture to our present-day circumstances, but we can better apply it if we know the original application of the text. Without this understanding, we risk imposing modern perspectives and prejudices onto ancient texts, potentially leading to misinterpretation.
Elwell and Yarbrough emphasize the necessity of understanding the historical and cultural context in which biblical texts were written. They argue that understanding the intended meaning of the original biblical writer is indeed crucial in interpreting scripture. I love how they said that the “study of the New Testament provides the historical dimension by which theological understanding and application must be informed.”
(Yarbrough 2013) For example, comprehending the Jewish customs and traditions prevalent in the time of Jesus aids in understanding the parables and teachings found in the New Testament.
It seems to me that most want to just go to the application of scripture. What can these verses do for me or how can I apply them to my life? Which is necessary, but without context, there can be a large amount of error in the application. “The New Testament is not ‘history’ in terms of purely natural causation. This was the historical-critical error. Nor is it ‘theology’ in the sense of spiritual or doctrinal teaching apart from its original setting and meaning. This would be the mistaken understanding of those who interpret it solely for devotional or doctrinal application. It is both history and theology simultaneously. The hermeneutic used to interpret it is crucial to correct understanding and application.” (Yarbrough 2013) Misinterpretation can lead to misapplication, resulting in harm or distortion of the biblical message. By observing the
author’s intended meaning, we maintain faithfulness to the text’s original purpose and avoid potential misuse.
In conclusion, Elwell and Yarbrough’s perspective highlights the importance of considering the intended meaning of the original biblical writer when interpreting scripture, as it enhances historical accuracy and theological insight, and guards against misapplication. While contemporary interpretations have their place, they should be informed by a solid foundation rooted in the
author’s original intent. Balancing these elements ensures a healthy and stable approach to biblical interpretation.
Works Cited
Yarbrough, Walter A. Elwell and Robert W. Encountering the New Testament: A Historical and Theological Survey.
Grand Rapids: Baker Acidemic, 2013.
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
- Access to all documents
- Unlimited textbook solutions
- 24/7 expert homework help