Response to Sharleen.edited

docx

School

Nairobi Institute of Technology - Westlands *

*We aren’t endorsed by this school

Course

MISC

Subject

Psychology

Date

Nov 24, 2024

Type

docx

Pages

2

Uploaded by dannetke

Report
Response to Sharleen, Hello Sharleen, I agree with your postulations regarding Cognitive Behavioural Therapy (CBT), Cognitive Processing Therapy (CPT), Cognitive Therapy (CT), and Prolonged Exposure Therapy (PET). I also agree with your comments about the emphasis on the existence of a therapeutic connection. I have experienced therapeutic relationships through many trauma therapy approaches. All treatment modalities need the development of a solid therapeutic alliance based on compassion, empathy, and unconditional positive regard. The therapy choices discussed, such as Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (CBT), Cognitive Processing Therapy (CPT), Cognitive Therapy (CT), and Prolonged Exposure Therapy (PET), have distinct impacts on various parts of PTSD symptoms. These are the main distinctions between the therapies. For instance, CBT could be more appropriate for individuals exhibiting cognitive and arousal symptoms, whereas PET is better suited to dealing with memories and trauma avoidance. The variations in treatment methods emphasize the significance of adjusting therapies to every person's unique requirements and symptoms. There are fundamental components of trauma treatment that never change, regardless of the therapeutic strategy. They include a reduction in the severity of harm and adverse experiences as well as the symptoms of PTSD. The objectives support the overarching goal of assisting people in healing from trauma and enhancing their well-being. Some people heal from the interventions with time, while others should live with the conditions by managing their symptoms. Therefore, it is the role of the practitioners to identify patients that will address the signs and those that experience recovery symptoms. Response to Wendy
Hello Wendy, I agree and support your postulations regarding Therapeutic windows. I concur with your assessment of the therapeutic window as a secure setting where clients integrate and process their painful experiences. Patients and practitioners must strike a balance within the window timeframe so unpleasant memories are appropriately examined without emotionally draining the client. Evaluating a client's readiness for emotional processing is essential when dealing with clients who find it difficult to operate inside the therapeutic window. Ongoing client assessment and communication are two ways the scholars and research advocate for enhancing the therapeutic window. The therapist should assess the client's capacity for managing their emotions, tolerance of discomfort, and general psychological health. Before exploring traumatic memories, it could be important to concentrate on more cognitive treatments and emotional control strategies if the client is not yet ready for emotional processing. The therapist and the client decide whether or not the client is ready to process their emotions. Therapists should ensure they have the knowledge, tools, and resources to deliver trauma treatment effectively. Occasionally most trauma treatments are rendered ineffective due to a lack of the appropriate resources to manage and support the processes. They should be conscious of their limitations and seek advice and guidance when necessary to avoid causing harm to the patient due to negligence and ignorance in their practice. When the client and the therapist are prepared to engage in this kind of treatment requires close communication. Therefore, the therapeutic window is a key idea in trauma therapy, and therapists should be careful to pace their clients' treatment and strike the correct balance to protect their safety and well-being.
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
  • Access to all documents
  • Unlimited textbook solutions
  • 24/7 expert homework help