Thin ideal

.docx

School

Eckerd College *

*We aren’t endorsed by this school

Course

COGNITIVE

Subject

Psychology

Date

Nov 24, 2024

Type

docx

Pages

8

Uploaded by bethaaholt

Report
Main menu WikipediaThe Free Encyclopedia Search Wikipedia Search Create account Log in Personal tools Contents hide (Top) Internalization Studies Toggle Studies subsection Development Media Toggle Media subsection Social influences Impact on women Women in magazines Women on television Modeling See also References Thin ideal Article Talk Read Edit
View history Tools From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia The thin ideal is the concept of the ideally slim female body.[1] The common perception of this ideal is a woman who possesses a slender, feminine physique with a small waist and little body fat.[1] The size that the thin ideal woman should be is decreasing while the rate of female obesity is simultaneously increasing, making this iconic body difficult for women to maintain.[2] This creates a gap between the actual appearance of an average woman’s body and its expected appearance which, depending on the extent to which a woman internalizes the necessity of living up to this ideal for her well-being and peace of mind, may have serious psychological effects.[2] Internalization The degree to which women are psychologically affected by the thin ideal depends to what extent the ideal is internalized.[3] An article from a journal written by Ahern, et al. highlights these ideals.[4] Women generally relate the ideally thin body to positive life outcomes such as happiness, confidence, and romantic success, and consequently a majority of women value the thin ideal to some extent.[5] However, it is important to recognize the distinction between women who are aware of the advantage of thinness versus those who internalize the ideal and make it a personal belief system.[6] Although the idea of the thin ideal seems omnipresent, not all women identify with the ideal in the same manner and not all are affected by it negatively.[7] For example, after seeing an image of a thin woman in the media, some women may fantasize themselves as thinner and more attractive.[5] To some, this exposure to the thin ideal may make thinness seem more attainable and act as a motivational factor in self-improvement.[5] Studies Many studies have been performed regarding the effect of the thin ideal. Some of these indicate that after women are shown images of ultra-thin models, they experience psychological and behavioral features associated with eating disorders, such as increased anger, depressed mood, body dissatisfaction, and low self-esteem.[2] The images had an immediate negative effect on the mood of the participating women.[2] In a study conducted by Halliwell and Dittmar (2004),[8] of 202 UK women, they found that those exposed to thin models created greater body-image anxiety in women who internalised the thin ideal compared to those who were exposed to average-sized models. Another study demonstrated that positive associations women made with underweight models frequently led to weight-focused anxiety and an elevated drive for thinness, both of which are principal symptoms of eating disorders.[3][4] Several longitudinal studies have suggested that internalization of the thin ideal is a precursor to body image dissatisfaction and unnecessary dieting in women of a healthy weight.[9] As Evans stated in the Psychology of Women Quarterly, “Women
often feel dissatisfied with their appearance after comparing themselves to other females who epitomize the thin-ideal standard of beauty.”[10] Development A study by Mia Sypeck of The American University’s Department of Psychology examined the covers of the four most popular fashion magazines over the last fifty years.[11] Several trends were discovered. Firstly, the body size of fashion models decreased, indicating that the thin ideal has been shrinking in size.[11] Secondly, there was a substantial rise in pictures that show the female body, which suggests that society has been placing more value on the way women's bodies appear. Media Many theorists believe that the ultra-thin images in the media play a significant part in the influence of body dissatisfaction, disordered eating, and internalization of the thin ideal.[4][12] A correlational study by Stice et al. (2004) suggests that a larger number of media exposures may be linked to a greater risk of body dissatisfaction, internalization of the thin ideal, and development of eating disorders symptoms.[6] However, few of the population in the study actually developed clinical eating disorders, and as the study was correlational, the said causes and effects may not be directly linked.[6] For example, many women enjoy looking at fashion magazines for entertainment and do not experience immediate negative effects. Consequently, the theory that the media directly influences low self-esteem and body image dissatisfaction may be too simple.[5] Social influences Contents of "thin-ideal media" include the portrayal of thinness as a desirable trait, and protagonists in media are thin, exceptionally beautiful, desirable, and successful.[13] According to the sociocultural model of bulimia, eating disorders are a product of the increasing pressures for women in our society to achieve an ultra-slender body.[14] There are two components to the social comparison theory: Downward social comparison, comparison to others perceived to be less fortunate than ourselves, and usually serves to enhance mood or self-worth; upward social comparison, comparison to others we perceive as socially better than ourselves, which usually leads to negative moods and self-evaluation.[15] In order to attempt to measure women's media-ideal internalization and comparison, researchers developed the Sociocultural Attitudes Towards Appearance Questionnaire. Women with a high degree of internalization are more likely to use thin- ideal media images as an upward comparison target and consequently feel that they do not meet the thin-ideal standard of attractiveness.[16] Women in the media are presented as having different roles in society depending on context and demographics. Television, magazines, and newspapers along with advertisements have a powerful and influential role in society, and women in the media are often role models for young, impressionable girls. Mass media affect dominant societal values and can influence the population. "Of the many variables thought to promote eating pathology, sociocultural factors are considered paramount."[17] Media-portrayed idealized images of the female body shape are linked to body dissatisfaction among women. The effects of these images have also been linked to other problems among women
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
  • Access to all documents
  • Unlimited textbook solutions
  • 24/7 expert homework help
including depression, obesity, and extreme dieting.[18] "The sociocultural etiological model is based on the premise that societal factors send powerful messages to girls and young women that certain physical attributes are unacceptable."[19] Women are presented with thin-ideal images on a regular basis and are conditioned to compare themselves to these images; research shows that women with high body image self-discrepancy are more at risk of negative correlations from exposure to thin- ideal media.[15] "Self-discrepancies are representations in the self-concept of ways in which one falls short of some important standard."[20] Women who possess a body image self-discrepancy associate failure to reach a thin-ideal with their self-concept. Research shows that only women who were dissatisfied with their physical appearance had concerns regarding social comparison to the thin ideal.[21] Impact on women Correlational studies have linked exposure to media that contain ultra-thin ideals to increased body- dissatisfaction, thin-ideal internalization, self-discrepancies, and eating pathology in young women. Sociocultural theory maintains that current societal standards for beauty emphasize the desirability of thinness, and thinness at a level impossible for many women to achieve by healthy means.[22] Photo manipulation that elongates legs and narrows hips of already skinny models have harmful effects on young women because they compare themselves to those images. Idealized images also suggest that real women do not measure up to such presentations of beauty, and they cannot reasonably obtain such physical expectations.[23] The standard media-portrayed thin ideal woman is about 15% below the average female body weight, "This ideal stresses slimness, youth and androgyny, rather than the normative female body. The thin-ideal woman portrayed in the media is biogenetically difficult, if not impossible, for the majority of women" to achieve.[12] Studies show the degree of thin-ideal internalization is correlated with the severity of eating disorder pathology. "Evidence also has shown that endorsement of the thin-ideal correlates with both bulimic symptoms and subsequent diagnosis of bulimia."[12] Stice and Shaw suggested in a study done in 1994 that thin-ideal media body images may produce negative mood states in women. Prolonged exposure to the thin-ideal can cause women to compare themselves to these images and lead to feelings of inadequacy.[12] Stice and Shaw suggested that women who over-internalize the thin-ideal image tend to experience increased body dissatisfaction and a decrease in self-esteem. As women over-internalize they may set unrealistic goals for themselves regarding their body dimension. "Those who have over-internalized the thin-ideal stereotype are convinced that achieving a thin-ideal body is the only way to be popular, loveable, successful, and happy."[14] When it comes to the impact on women's self-esteem, exposure to thin models does not necessarily mean that there will be a negative impact. The way that the models are presented makes a difference. A study has shown that there is a positive impact on women's self-esteem when they are shown moderately thin, not extremely thin models. One study has shown that exposure to extremely thin and extremely heavy models both have a negative effect on the way that some women in the study might see their own bodies. As for models that are only moderately thin or moderately heavy there doesn’t seem to be a negative impact but a positive one on self-image. (Smeesters and Mandel 581).” If the media started to do this more when it comes to models an increase of self-esteem could happen.[24]
Women in magazines Women's magazines focus mainly on "domestic" aspects of life, including marriage, child-rearing, beauty, etc.[25] More than 75% of women’s magazines include at least one ad or article about how to change their physical appearance by diet, exercise, or cosmetic surgery.[26] Twenty-five percent of the magazines contained messages regarding weight loss and dieting suggestions. Many women's magazines focus on how to lead a better life by improving physical appearance, while men's magazines provide information about hobbies, activities, and entertainment.[27] When women are constantly exposed to ways to alter their appearance, they may over-internalize and feel pressure to look like the images they see. The analyses of images in women's magazines observed from 1901 to 1980 and from 1959 to 1999 show that the featured models have become thinner over time, making the thin ideal even more difficult to achieve.[18] Women on television According to researchers, 94% of females on television are thinner than the average women (168.5lbs)[28] in the United States.[29] It is normal in society today for women to work and provide an income, but it is still common for women on television to be portrayed in traditional female roles. According to the study done by Donald M. Davis, "While many of society's institutions have moved forward with respect to women, television may be lagging behind, at least as evidenced by demographic variables."[30] Modeling The top modeling and fashion industries often embrace the ultra-thin appearance. A majority of elite models are approximately 20% underweight, exceeding the anorexia nervosa indicator of 15% underweight.[22] Fashion models and modeling agencies are often blamed for the societal pressures that cause young women to develop eating disorders. Others argue that modeling agencies and fashion cannot be blamed for the disordered eating behavior of easily influenced adolescents. However, after several incidents in which models died from anorexia nervosa, such as the case of Ana Carolina Reston, several major fashion modeling events have adopted new policies to encourage healthy body weights.[31] For example, Madrid Fashion Week officials banned models with a body mass index lower than eighteen.[32] Comparable guidelines have been adopted in similar fashion events in other countries, such as Brazil and Argentina.[32] See also Anti-fat bias Female body shape Body image
Size zero References Low, K. G.; Charanasomboon, S.; Brown, C.; Hiltunen, G.; Long, K.; Reinhalter, K.; Jones, H. (2003). "Internalization of the Thin Ideal, Weight and Body Image Concerns". Social Behavior and Personality. 31: 81–89. doi:10.2224/sbp.2003.31.1.81. Pinhas, Leora, Brenda B. Toner, Alisha Ali, Paul E. Garfinkel, and Noreen Stuckless. "The Effects of the Ideal of Female Beauty on Mood and Body Satisfaction." International Journal of Eating Disorders (1998): 223-26. Ahern, Amy L.; Bennett, Kate M.; Kelly, Michelle; Hetherington, Marion M. (2011). "A Qualitative Exploration of Young Women's Attitudes towards the Thin Ideal". Journal of Health Psychology. 16 (1): 70–79. doi:10.1177/1359105310367690. PMID 20709877. S2CID 44966631. Ahern, A. L.; Bennett, K. M.; Hetherington, M. M. (2008). "Internalization of the Ultra-Thin Ideal: Positive Implicit Associations with Underweight Fashion Models are Associated with Drive for Thinness in Young Women". Eating Disorders. 16 (4): 294–307. doi:10.1080/10640260802115852. PMID 18568920. S2CID 2473526. Tiggemann, M.; Polivy, J.; Hargreaves, D. (2009). "The Processing of Thin Ideals in Fashion Magazines: A Source of Social Comparison or Fantasy?". Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology. 28: 73–93. doi:10.1521/jscp.2009.28.1.73. hdl:2328/26079. Dittmar, H.; Howard, S. (2004). "Thin-Ideal Internalization and Social Comparison Tendency as Moderators of Media Models' Impact on Women's Body-Focused Anxiety". Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology. 23 (6): 768–791. doi:10.1521/jscp.23.6.768.54799. Mask, Lisa; Blanchard, Celine M. (2011). "The Protective Role of General Self-determination against 'thin Ideal' Media Exposure on Women's Body Image and Eating-related Concerns". Journal of Health Psychology. 16 (3): 489–99. doi:10.1177/1359105310385367. PMID 21224335. S2CID 39541465. Does Thin Always Sell? The Moderating Role of Thin Ideal: Internalization on Adv Internalization on Advertising E tising Effectiveness, Atlantic Marketing Journal, May 2015 Juarascio, Adrienne S., Evan M. Forman, C. Alix Timko, James D. Herbert, Meghan Butryn, and Michael Lowe. "Implicit Internalization of the Thin Ideal as a Predictor of Increases in Weight, Body Dissatisfaction, and Disordered Eating." Eating Behaviors 12.3 (2011): 207-13. Evans, Peggy Chin (2003). ""IF Only I Were Thin Like Her, Maybe I Could be Happy Like Her": The Self- Implications of Associating a Thin Female Ideal with Life Success". Psychology of Women Quarterly. 27 (3): 209. doi:10.1111/1471-6402.00100. S2CID 144639686. Sypeck, Mia F., James J. Gray, and Anthony H. Ahrens. "No Longer Just a Pretty Face: Fashion Magazines' Depictions of Ideal Female Beauty from 1959 to 1999." International Journal of Eating Disorders (2003): 342-47. Hawkins, N.; Richards, P. S.; Granley, H. M. C.; Stein, D. M. (2004). "The Impact of Exposure to the Thin-Ideal Media Image on Women". Eating Disorders. 12 (1): 35–50. doi:10.1080/10640260490267751. PMID 16864303. S2CID 28802161. Harrison, Kristen (2006). "The Body Electric: Thin-Ideal Media and Eating Disorders in Adolescents". Journal of Communication. 50 (3): 119–143. doi:10.1093/joc/50.3.119. hdl:2027.42/75586.
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
  • Access to all documents
  • Unlimited textbook solutions
  • 24/7 expert homework help
Stice, E.; Shaw, H. E. (1994). "Adverse Effects of the Media Portrayed Thin-Ideal on Women and Linkages to Bulimic Symptomatology". Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology. 13 (3): 288–308. doi:10.1521/jscp.1994.13.3.288. Bessenoff, G. R. (September 2006). "Can the Media Affect Us? Social Comparison, Self-Discrepancy, and the Thin Ideal". Psychology of Women Quarterly. 30 (3): 239–251. doi:10.1111/j.1471- 6402.2006.00292.x. S2CID 145108451. Striegel-Moore, R.H.; D.L. Franko (2002). "Body image issues among girls and women". Body Image: A Handbook of Theory, Research, and Clinical Practice: 183–191. Slevec, Julie; Marika Tiggemann (2011). "Media Exposure, Body Dissatisfaction, and Disordered Eating in Middle Aged Women". Psychology of Women Quarterly. 35 (4): 617–627. doi:10.1177/0361684311420249. S2CID 144877417. Knobloch-Westerwick, Silvia; Josselyn Crane (March 2011). "A Losing Battle: Effects of Prolonged Exposure to Thin-Ideal Images on Dieting and Body Satisfaction". Communication Research. 39: 79– 102. doi:10.1177/0093650211400596. S2CID 28402252. DiNicola, V.F. (1990). "Anorexia multiform: Self-starvation in historical and cultural context". Transcultural Psychiatric Research Review. 27 (4): 245–286. doi:10.1177/136346159002700401. S2CID 144566470. Higgins, E.T. (1987). "Self-discrepancy: A theory relating self and affect". Psychological Review. 94 (3): 319–340. doi:10.1037/0033-295x.94.3.319. PMID 3615707. Posavac, H.D. (1998). "Exposure to media images of female attractiveness and concern with body weight among young women". Sex Roles. 38 (3/4): 187–201. doi:10.1023/A:1018729015490. S2CID 56087076. Brown, A.; Dittmar, H. (2005). "Think "Thin" and Feel Bad: The Role of Appearance Schema Activation, Attention Level, and Thin–Ideal Internalization for Young Women's Responses to Ultra– Thin Media Ideals". Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology. 24 (8): 1088–1113. doi:10.1521/jscp.2005.24.8.1088. Lester, Paul Martin (2003). Images that Injure: Pictorial Stereotypes in the Media (Second ed.). Westport, CT: Praeger Publishers. "Positive And Negative Media Image Effects On The Self." Journal of Consumer Research 32.4 (2006): 576-582. Academic Search Complete. Web. 6 Mar. 2016. (Gaye Tuchman. The Symbolic Annihilation of Women by the Mass Media) "Beauty and Body Image in the Media". Media Awareness Network. Archived from the original on 18 January 2009. Retrieved 30 March 2012. Malkin, Amy R.; Kimberlie Wornian; Joan C. Chrisler (1999). "Women and Weight: Gendered Messages on Magazine Covers". Sex Roles. 40 (7/8): 647–655. doi:10.1023/A:1018848332464. S2CID 142601261. https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/series/sr_03/sr03_039.pdf[bare URL PDF] Gonzalez-Lavin, A.; L. Smolak (2005). "Women's exposure to thin-and-beautiful media images". Body Image. 2 (1): 74–80. doi:10.1016/j.bodyim.2004.11.001. PMID 18089176.
Davis, Donald M. (1990). "Portrayals of Women in prime-time network television". Sex Roles. 23 (5– 6): 325–332. doi:10.1007/bf00290052. S2CID 144544470. "The Skinny on Models." Weekly Reader Corporation 2011: 7. Agrell, Siri (2008). "Thin Police". Canadian Medical Association Journal. 179 (2): 204. doi:10.1503/cmaj.080894. PMC 2443217. Category: Body shape This page was last edited on 15 November 2023, at 07:34 (UTC). Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License 4.0; additional terms may apply. By using this site, you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. Wikipedia® is a registered trademark of the Wikimedia Foundation, Inc., a non-profit organization. Privacy policyAbout WikipediaDisclaimersContact WikipediaCode of ConductDevelopersStatisticsCookie statementMobile viewWikimedia FoundationPowered by MediaWiki Toggle limited content width
Recommended textbooks for you
Text book image
Ciccarelli: Psychology_5 (5th Edition)
Psychology
ISBN:9780134477961
Author:Saundra K. Ciccarelli, J. Noland White
Publisher:PEARSON
Text book image
Cognitive Psychology
Psychology
ISBN:9781337408271
Author:Goldstein, E. Bruce.
Publisher:Cengage Learning,
Text book image
Introduction to Psychology: Gateways to Mind and ...
Psychology
ISBN:9781337565691
Author:Dennis Coon, John O. Mitterer, Tanya S. Martini
Publisher:Cengage Learning
Text book image
Psychology in Your Life (Second Edition)
Psychology
ISBN:9780393265156
Author:Sarah Grison, Michael Gazzaniga
Publisher:W. W. Norton & Company
Text book image
Cognitive Psychology: Connecting Mind, Research a...
Psychology
ISBN:9781285763880
Author:E. Bruce Goldstein
Publisher:Cengage Learning
Text book image
Theories of Personality (MindTap Course List)
Psychology
ISBN:9781305652958
Author:Duane P. Schultz, Sydney Ellen Schultz
Publisher:Cengage Learning
SEE MORE TEXTBOOKS
Recommended textbooks for you
Text book image
Ciccarelli: Psychology_5 (5th Edition)
Psychology
ISBN:9780134477961
Author:Saundra K. Ciccarelli, J. Noland White
Publisher:PEARSON
Text book image
Cognitive Psychology
Psychology
ISBN:9781337408271
Author:Goldstein, E. Bruce.
Publisher:Cengage Learning,
Text book image
Introduction to Psychology: Gateways to Mind and ...
Psychology
ISBN:9781337565691
Author:Dennis Coon, John O. Mitterer, Tanya S. Martini
Publisher:Cengage Learning
Text book image
Psychology in Your Life (Second Edition)
Psychology
ISBN:9780393265156
Author:Sarah Grison, Michael Gazzaniga
Publisher:W. W. Norton & Company
Text book image
Cognitive Psychology: Connecting Mind, Research a...
Psychology
ISBN:9781285763880
Author:E. Bruce Goldstein
Publisher:Cengage Learning
Text book image
Theories of Personality (MindTap Course List)
Psychology
ISBN:9781305652958
Author:Duane P. Schultz, Sydney Ellen Schultz
Publisher:Cengage Learning
SEE MORE TEXTBOOKS