Strangelove.fall.23
docx
keyboard_arrow_up
School
University of Illinois, Chicago *
*We aren’t endorsed by this school
Course
200
Subject
Political Science
Date
Dec 6, 2023
Type
docx
Pages
4
Uploaded by ianchoong
POLS 200
Methods of Political Science
Fall 2023
R. H. Bruhl
An Exercise in Strategic Analysis
(10 points)
Due 11/20/23
The movie “Dr. Strangelove” presents a particularly interesting case of strategic decision-
making.
We will watch the movie in class and you are then tasked with completing the
following analytical exercise.
As a memory refresher, the movie may be viewed online at
archive.org/details/DRStrangelove_20130616.
To properly understand a decision-making problem, it is important to understand the
context in which it occurs.
Although the events in the movie are fictional, the underlying
political and historical context are not, and it is important to understand the relationship
between the United States and Soviet Union at the time portrayed in this movie.
It was a
relationship of war.
It was said to be a “Cold War” because no actual battles took place
between the two countries, but much military action occurred between proxy agents of
the two countries.
Consequently, both countries recognized the potential for direct
military confrontation and were appropriately prepared.
Given this context, the movie
begins with a high-level Air Force officer (General Jack Ripper) giving orders to the
nuclear weapon-carrying bombers under his command to launch a nuclear strike against
the Soviet Union.
While US policy strictly requires such an order to originate only with
the President, a provision in the military chain of command allows a military commander
to issue the nuclear strike command if the President and his or her proper successors have
been killed by an enemy attack.
This was not the case, however, and no attack of any
kind had been launched, nor was any attack immanent.
General Ripper, in fact, had
issued the command under his own authority.
Moreover, the aircraft under his command
already on patrol near the Soviet Union were already at their so-called “Fail-Safe”
positions, so the pilots had no way of independently determining the legitimacy of
General Ripper’s order.
Consequently, they honestly believed the US to have been
attacked and honestly followed their given orders.
The US Strategic Air Command (SAC), of course, monitors all radio activity among and
between the bases and their aircraft, and General Ripper’s orders were immediately
discovered.
However, because the nuclear attack orders require the receiving aircraft to
switch their communication systems to a key-coded modality for obvious security
reasons, the SAC personnel could not rescind General Ripper’s orders.
Moreover,
General Ripper had sequestered himself in his base using his security forces.
Those
security forces had been also been led to believe by General Ripper that the US had
sustained an attack and invasion by the Soviet Union, so they could be expected to fight
1
to the death.
As time was of the essence, it became clear to SAC personnel there was
little reason to believe the aircraft could be recalled.
Immediately apprised of this situation, the President considered the only three options he
had:
1)
launch a full attack on the Soviet Union;
2)
help the Soviet Union shoot-down the US aircraft before they reached their
targets; or
3)
do nothing.
In making his considerations, he also knew the Soviet Union could do any one of the
three things:
1)
launch a full counter-attack;
2)
honestly accept the help of the US and not launch any counter-attack; or
3)
do nothing.
These considerations can be seen in the following “strategic analysis” matrix:
US Options
Soviet Union
counter-attacks
Soviet Union
accepts help
Soviet Union
Does nothing
Worst case US
outcome
Full attack
The U.S wins
and 20 million
dead
Not Applicable
The U.S wins
and Soviet
Union loses
20 million or
less dead and
the U.S wins
Help Soviet
Union shoot-
down US
bombers
The United
States loses
because it
allows the
Soviet Union to
shoot down its
own bombers.
In order to
preserve lives,
the US and the
USSR
cooperate with
one another
rather than
wage war on
one another,
which creates
no winners or
losers.
The United
States loses
because it
assisted the
Soviet Union in
downing its
own bombers.
The U.S is
defeated, and at
least 20 million
people dead.
2
Do nothing
Since the
Soviet Union
views it as an
act of war, they
win and the
United States
loses.
Not Applicable
Since the
Soviet Union
doesn't
counterattack,
the United
States wins.
The U.S is
defeated
The President was also given a military appraisal regarding each of the potential
outcomes related to these different scenarios.
Assuming the military appraisals were
honest and accurate, use the matrix shown above to answer the following questions:
1)
In the matrix, briefly (
< 10 words each
) describe the potential outcome to the US
and the outcome to the USSR of each of the options open to the US (3.5 points).
ANS:
-
The United States seizes the chance to defeat the Soviet Union and prevail.
-
The United States will lose if it helps the Soviet Union down American aircraft,
but the world will be spared catastrophic damage.
-
-The Soviet Union could threaten the United States if it does nothing. They could
launch a response, viewing this as an act of war that would claim millions of
lives.
2)
In the matrix, identify the worst case outcome for each US option (3 points).
ANS:
-
In either case, the United States would consider this a defeat, murder their own,
and remain uncertain as to whether the Soviet Union would launch a
counterattack. The United States and the Soviet Union collaborate to bring down
American bombers before they reach their objective. The United States will
ultimately lose even if it does nothing because the Soviet Union may attack.
3)
Suggest what the President should do and why.
Comparison of potential outcomes (1.5 points)
Recommendation (2 points)
ANS:
Without the assistance of the Soviet Union, the President ought to have just brought down
the American boomers. In a group where there is already a great deal of conflict and
mistrust, placing trust raises the likelihood of retaliation Therefore, the possibility of
Soviet retaliation is eliminated by just relying on American personnel. If not, the Soviets
would not be able to honor their promise and launch an unexpected attack. I believe that
this course of action would be the best because, even though the United States is losing
soldiers, it won't be seen as an act of war and escalate tensions.
3
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
- Access to all documents
- Unlimited textbook solutions
- 24/7 expert homework help
This assignment is due 11/20/23.
It should be submitted electronically through
Blackboard.
If you type your answers, you may send the edited Word document.
If you
handwrite your answers, you must scan the document as a pdf file and submit the pdf.
DO NOT SEND YOUR DOCUMENT AS A PICTURE.
DUE TO THE NATURE OF THIS ASSIGNMENT, RE-SUBMISSIONS FOR RE-
GRADING WILL NOT BE ACCEPTED.
4