Mini-Assignment #16
docx
keyboard_arrow_up
School
Eagle River High School *
*We aren’t endorsed by this school
Course
205L
Subject
Political Science
Date
Nov 24, 2024
Type
docx
Pages
2
Uploaded by LieutenantProton7813
1
Donna Ortiz
Mini-Assignment #16: Supreme Court Case Brief on New York Times Co. v. US
New York Times Co. v. United States, 403 U.S. 713 (1971)
Facts
The "Pentagon Papers," a classified Defense Department study on American involvement
in Vietnam, were the subject of efforts by the Nixon Administration to stop the New York Times
and the Washington Post from releasing information about them. The administration's actions
were contested in court, giving rise to this lawsuit, with the justification being that prior restraint
was required to safeguard national security.
Legal Question(s)
Did the Nixon administration violate the First Amendment's protection of press freedom
by trying to prevent the New York Times and the Washington Post from releasing secret
information?
Arguments
The New York Times and the Washington Post claimed that the First Amendment
protected their right to make the information public. They argued that preemptive press
restrictions were an infringement on their right to free expression. The United States asserted that
the exposure of the classified information would endanger national security in order to support
the imposition of prior restraint.
Decision
The Court decided in favor of the New York Times Company because it determined that
the government had not provided enough evidence to support the application of prior restraint.
The Court argued that the government must disprove a strong presumption against prior restraint.
2
Justices Black and Douglas argue that the word "security" shouldn't be used as an excuse to
disregard the fundamental protections provided by the First Amendment. Since the release of the
material did not directly endanger the security of American soldiers, Justice Brennan argued that
prior restriction was not necessary.
Impact and Significance
The situation served as a reminder of the First Amendment's critical role in protecting
journalistic freedom, even when dealing with private or sensitive information. It established a
significant precedent that limited the government's ability to proactively impose restrictions on
the freedom of the press. The decision stressed the need for transparency and accountability in
governmental actions and reaffirmed the notion that press freedom is a fundamental component
of a democratic society. This issue keeps coming up in discussions about how to balance public
access to information with national security.
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
- Access to all documents
- Unlimited textbook solutions
- 24/7 expert homework help