Cameron Romano Lab 5-2

pdf

School

University of Massachusetts, Lowell *

*We aren’t endorsed by this school

Course

1410

Subject

Physics

Date

Apr 3, 2024

Type

pdf

Pages

9

Uploaded by PrivateElement13512

Report
Cameron Romano Physics 1410 Lab Jack Shannon 10/7/2023 Luke Shomphe and Matt Favreau Experiment #5 Impulse and Collisions Objectives: Identify the principles of impulse and momentum in the context of collisions between objects and determine the relationship between impulse, time, and force.
Introduction This experiment will study collisions as collisions can be used to study the details of forces. Typical analysis of collisions involves using the principle of conservation of linear momentum as this is one of the most useful conservation laws in physics. Alternatively, the details of the force during a collision can be measured directly and compared to the change in the linear momentum, which is the approach taken in this experiment. In this experiment the direct measurement of the forces involved during the collision between a spring and a cart will result in the time-dependence of the force and will demonstrate the Impulse- Momentum Theorem. We will examine the variables that contribute to a collisions, and how these factors effect impulse. Through trials examining individual factors we can determine the relationships and dependence of these variables upon impulse. By manipulating the time that a collision occurs over we can evaluate how it affects the impulse of the collision if at all and in relation how it effects the force experienced in the collision. The theory for this experiment is that when extending the time of which a collision occurs it lowers the maximum force experienced in the collision, as the force is experienced over a greater period of time the force is distributed throughout that period of time. This theory will be tested by the experiment in order to prove it as this trend should be demonstrated by the data recorded. Formulas: Force is dependent upon linear momentum as defined by: 𝐹⃗ = ?𝑝⃗ ?𝑡 Impulse momentum theorem defines J as Impulse: 𝐽⃗ 𝑝⃗ 𝑡 𝑖 𝑡 ? ∫ 𝐹⃗ ?𝑡 = 𝑡 𝑖 𝑡 ? ∫ ?𝑝⃗ = The relationship between force and impulse is described as 𝐽⃗ = ∆t =∆ 𝑝⃗ 𝐹⃗ 𝑎𝑣?𝑟𝑎??
Apparatus and Procedure Fig 1. Experimental Apparatus Setup 1. Determine the mass of the cart + force sensor. 2. Open the vernier graphical analysis software and open the program, “Impulse Momentum v2”. 3. Turn on the motion sensor on the cart and connect it to the computer. Data Collection 1. Screw the light spring into the bracket. The cart's track should be horizontal for this part of the experiment. 2. To record data zero the sensor, and then click the collect button. 3. Perform and record three collisions each with different initial velocities letting the cart collide with the spring. 4. This will create two graphs, velocity versus time and force versus time. 5. Press the ‘statistics’ button in the top menu. This will display the maximum (initial) and minimum (final) velocities. 6. From the ‘analyze’ menu, select ‘integral’ to obtain the impulse, compare this result with that for the change in momentum of the cart. 7. Record the maximum force experienced during each collision run. 8. Use these values to describe and analyze the relationship between the maximum force and the initial speed. 9. Copy the graphs from one of your trials to include in report. 10. Repeat this procedure for the recordings of data studying the collisions with an air bag and with nothing to slow down the collision.
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
  • Access to all documents
  • Unlimited textbook solutions
  • 24/7 expert homework help
Results and Analysis Results: V i (m/s) V f (m/s) ∆P (kg*m/s) J = F ∆t (N*S) % Difference Max force (N) 0.2082 -0.167 -0.29029 -0.3095 6.206785 -2.727 0.4747 -0.3813 -0.6674 -0.6247 -6.83528 -6.07 0.6044 -0.4975 -0.8625 -0.8736 1.270604 -12.33 Table 1. Light Spring Data V i (m/s) V f (m/s) ∆P (kg*m/s) J = F ∆t (N*S) % Difference Max force (N) 0.6472 -0.2236 -0.72433864 -0.7121 -1.7186687 -30.77 0.7014 -0.1951 -0.73777318 -0.7553 2.32051106 -36.2 0.5896 -0.1743 -0.63047352 -0.6137 -2.7331791 -25.72 Table 2. Air Bag Data V i (m/s) V f (m/s) ∆P (kg*m/s) J = F ∆t (N*S) % Difference Max force (N) 0.6507 -0.1424 -0.64585 -0.8984 28.11147 -44.83 0.709 -0.1507 -0.69925 -0.46 -52.0116 -44.09 0.7597 -0.1521 -0.73988 -0.916 19.22709 -45.81 Table 3. No Air Bag Data
Fig 2. Velocity versus time and force versus time graphs (Light Spring) Fig 3. Velocity versus time and force versus time graphs (Air Bag)
Fig 4. Velocity versus time and force versus time graphs (No Air Bag) Analysis: This data demonstrates trends among the relationships between, velocity, force, and time. Notably the interval of time during the collision decreases with each recording. However, as the interval of time increases, the maximum force experienced at that time is increased. Our data displays the maximum forces were greatest from the recordings with no air bag while the least force were from the light spring. Notably throughout all of our trials it seems that with regard to velocity, the impulses experienced in each collision were consistent with each other. Another notable trend in our data is that of position and force as demonstrated in our provided graphs as I noticed that with consideration to the position, the force was not affected by what it was colliding with which implies that the maximum forces varied but that did not impact the magnitude of the force experienced, this would explain why the forces were experienced over greater periods of time. For example, the tests with the air bag and no air bag there were trials that had the same initial velocity with negligible difference, 0.7014 and 0.709 respectively and also had roughly the same impulse, 0.73777318 and 0.69925 respectively, however the test with no air bag displayed a greater force with 44.09 N while the air bag test displayed 36.2 N. Discussion
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
  • Access to all documents
  • Unlimited textbook solutions
  • 24/7 expert homework help
From these results we are able to determine that when the interval of time experienced in a collision is increased it decreases the force of the impulse as it causes the force to be applied over a longer period of time therefore it is experienced as a weaker force. As expressed in the formula for impulse, ∆𝑝 = 𝐹∆𝑡 This would mean that to experience a lesser force we must experience it over a greater period of time allowing for the force to dissipate over the interval of time. This is demonstrated by our results as we tested 3 different scenarios each of which varied the interval of time at which the force was experienced, as the light spring experienced the greatest period while the trial with no spring or air bag experienced the shortest period. During a collision, an object always encounters an impulse and a change in momentum. During a collision, the impulse which an object experiences is equal to its velocity change. The velocity change of two respective objects involved in a collision will always be equal. This can be derived from our results as demonstrated by our data. From our graphs and the formula for impulse we can also derive that the area under a force-time graph is force multiplied by time, which is the quantity of impulse. For our measurements there are some experimental uncertainties that may have affected them as we did not account for forces such as friction, air resistance, and other unforeseen forces, all of which would have opposed the motion of the cart and thus decreased our measured force. However, for the trials with the air bag we had much higher percent difference which can be attributed to the fact that these recordings were much less precise compared to those with or without the spring as in those instances we could more accurately measure the force applied by the spring whereas with the airbag it was much more erratic and as it was not held in place constantly as the spring was this led to innacurresies in our measurements and recordings.There were some difficulties in performing this lab as we struggled with the procedure because it was somewhat difficult to collect accurate readings from the sensor and to avoid uncertainties from skewing our data. Some measurements took a few attempts to collect our data but we were able to get acceptable data for each trial.
Fig 5. Spring System Diagram Conclusion From this experiment we were able to determine that increasing the time of the impact results in a decrease in the force. Therefore if t is increased, for a constant change in momentum, the force on the body is reduced. This relationship was observed and recorded through this experiment as the data demonstrated an increase in the interval of time resulted in a smaller force being experienced. This is proven by the formula for impulse as, , which demonstrates this relationship between time, force and ∆𝑝 = 𝐹∆𝑡 impulse as since the impulse experienced in a collision is constant, when we increase the time experienced in the collision it decreases the force experienced and vice versa. Questions 1. Compare and contrast the results from collisions with the light spring and those with the airbag. What differences did you observe in terms of impulse and force? Explain the possible reasons behind these differences.
1) From collisions with the light spring and those with the airbag I noticed that the collisions with the light spring displayed lower forces than with the air bag and that the time of the collision occurring was longer the light spring, therefore the light spring displayed a lesser force over a longer period of time while the air bag displayed a greater force over a shorter period of time. 2. Explain how the concept of impulse can be used to minimize injuries during a car crash. What other safety measures are based on this principle? 2) The concept of impulse can be used to minimize injuries during a car crash because our seats have air bags for collisions which increase the time in which the force is experienced so that force less over that time. Other safety measures that are based on this principle are in car crashes we apply air bags so that we can expand the interval of time in which our bodies experience the collision, decreasing the force experienced on us, the same application is also used in sports when developing the padding in helmets or other protective gear. 3. Discuss the practical applications of the impulse-momentum theorem. How is this theorem relevant in real-life scenarios, such as car safety or sports? 3) Impulse-momentumtheorem provides many relevant in real-life scenarios and practical applications where it is tremendously important for example, in car crashes we apply air bags so that we can expand the interval of time in which our bodies experience the collision, decreasing the force experienced on us, the same application is also used in sports when developing the padding in helmets or other protective gear.
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
  • Access to all documents
  • Unlimited textbook solutions
  • 24/7 expert homework help