week 5 quiz
docx
keyboard_arrow_up
School
Ashford University *
*We aren’t endorsed by this school
Course
103
Subject
Philosophy
Date
Apr 3, 2024
Type
docx
Pages
12
Uploaded by KidSalmon4176
Skip To Content
ions
Week 5 Quiz
[WLO: 1] [CLOs: 1, 2, 3]
Prior to taking this quiz, read Chapter 9 in your textbook
With Good Reason: A Guide to Critical Thinking
(Updated ed.). The University of Arizona Global Campus and review the video
The Value Of Critical Thinking In Daily Life
Links
to an external site.
.
This quiz is comprehensive, meaning that it covers material from the entire course (including this week’s reading), so make sure to review all relevant material prior to beginning the quiz. The quiz contains 20 multiple-choice
questions and is worth 10% of your course grade. You will have three hours to complete the quiz, and it must be taken in one sitting. You are only allowed one attempt at this final quiz.
Attempt History
Attempt
Time
Score
LATEST
Attempt 1
18 minutes
15.5 out of 20
Correct answers are hidden.
Score for this quiz:
15.5
out of 20
Submitted Mar 24 at 4:27pm
This attempt took 18 minutes.
Question 1
1
/ 1
pts
An argument is cogent if, and only if, _____________
it is valid and all its premises are true.
it commits no fallacies.
it has all true premises.
its reasoning is strong and all its premises are true.
The answer can be found in Section 5.1, “Basic Concepts in Inductive Reasoning,” of
With Good Reason: A Guide to Critical Thinking
.
Incorrect
Question 2
0
/ 1
pts
Which of these is true about sound arguments?
A sound argument always has true premises.
A sound argument with false premises can have a true conclusion.
A sound argument may or may not be valid.
A sound argument can have a false conclusion.
The answer can be found in Section 3.1, “Basic Concepts in Deductive Reasoning,” of
With Good Reason: A Guide to Critical Thinking
.
Question 3
1
/ 1
pts
When it comes to inferences to the best explanation, the conclusion of the argument _________
attempts to provide the most likely explanation of the observation mentioned in the premises.
creates a valid deductive argument.
states the effect of the cause mentioned in the premises.
never creates a very strong argument.
The answer can be found in Section 6.5, “Inference to the Best Explanation,” of
With Good Reason: A Guide to Critical Thinking
.
Incorrect
Question 4
0
/ 1
pts
Frogs are amphibians. All amphibians lay their eggs in water. So, frogs lay their eggs in water.
True or False: The statement, “Frogs are amphibians,” is a premise in this argument.
True
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
- Access to all documents
- Unlimited textbook solutions
- 24/7 expert homework help
False
The answer can be found in Section 2.2, “Extracting Arguments in the Standard Form,” of
With Good Reason: A Guide to Critical Thinking
.
Question 5
1
/ 1
pts
When disagreeing with a premise, __________.
one should point to the outcomes of the conclusion.
one should have reasons in place to demonstrate the premise is not sufficiently likely to be true.
one should attack premises that are not important to the argument.
one should point out the failings of its author.
The answer can be found in Section 9.4, “Confronting Disagreement by Seeking Truth,” of
With Good Reason: A Guide to Critical Thinking
.
Question 6
1
/ 1
pts
Suppose that the premises of an argument are: “All dogs are green” and “No
green things are tall.” Which of these conclusions makes the argument valid?
“All dogs are tall.”
“No dogs are tall.”
“Dogs are mammals.”
“All tall things are dogs.”
None of these
The answer can be found in Section 3.1, “Basic Concepts in Deductive Reasoning,” of
With Good Reason: A Guide to Critical Thinking
.
Incorrect
Question 7
0
/ 1
pts
How should one ethically engage in verbal argumentation?
Maintain a focus on demonstrating the other person is wrong.
Maintain a focus on the argument when analyzing what people are saying.
Try to win at all costs.
Stick to one’s position even if the evidence better supports the opposing position.
The answer can be found in Section 9.4, “Confronting Disagreement by Seeking Truth,” of
With Good Reason: A Guide to Critical Thinking
.
Partial
Question 8
0.5
/ 1
pts
What fallacy is committed by the following reasoning? “This band is the best;
everybody says so.”
Appeal to popular opinion
Appeal to pity
Begging the question
Straw man
No fallacy
The answer can be found in Section 7.1, “Fallacies of Relevance,” of
With Good Reason: A Guide to Critical Thinking
.
Question 9
1
/ 1
pts
Suppose that the premises of an argument are: “All magpies are birds. Johnny is a magpie.” Which of these conclusions makes the argument valid?
“A human can be a bird.”
“A human cannot be a bird.”
“Johnny is not a human.”
“Johnny is a bird.”
None of these
The answer can be found in Section 3.1, “Basic Concepts in Deductive Reasoning,” of
With Good Reason: A Guide to Critical Thinking
.
Question 10
1
/ 1
pts
The principle of charity in logic is __________.
the idea that we should interpret the argument or objection in the strongest way possible.
the idea that one should give to the poor.
the idea that we only see the good in arguments that align with our beliefs.
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
- Access to all documents
- Unlimited textbook solutions
- 24/7 expert homework help
the idea that one should change one’s mind when presented with contrary evidence.
The answer can be found in Section 9.4, “Confronting Disagreement by Seeking Truth,” of
With Good Reason: A Guide to Critical Thinking
.
Question 11
1
/ 1
pts
Is the following argument valid or invalid? “All dogs are green. Rover is green. So Rover is a dog.”
Valid
Invalid
Impossible to tell
The answer can be found in Section 3.2, “Evaluating Deductive Arguments,” of
With Good Reason: A Guide to Critical Thinking
.
Question 12
1
/ 1
pts
What fallacy is committed by the following reasoning? “I ate a grapefruit, then it snowed. Therefore, I am going to eat a grapefruit next time I want it to snow.”
Equivocation
Fallacy of accident
False cause
Straw man
No fallacy
The answer can be found in Section 7.1, “Fallacies of Support,” of
With Good Reason: A Guide to Critical Thinking
.
Question 13
1
/ 1
pts
Inference to the best explanation ___________________
infers that something is (probably) true because it provides the best explanation of the observation(s).
infers that the hypothesis is (probably) false because its deduced consequence failed.
is a valid deductive argument form.
reasons from the specific to the general.
The answer can be found in Section 6.5, “Inference to the Best Explanation,” of
With Good Reason: A Guide to Critical Thinking
.
Question 14
1
/ 1
pts
If you eat all that candy, then you will get sick. If you get sick, then you won’t
be able to go to the dance. If you don’t go to the dance, you won’t be able to
dance with Hilary. If you don’t get to dance with Hilary, then you will be miserable. So, you shouldn’t eat it.
Which of the following is the conclusion of this argument?
Hilary hates candy.
You shouldn’t go to the dance.
You shouldn’t eat all that candy.
Misery is bad.
The answer can be found in Section 2.2, “Extracting Arguments in the Standard Form,” of
With Good Reason: A Guide to Critical Thinking
.
Incorrect
Question 15
0
/ 1
pts
What type of argument is the following? “The last pickle I ate from that jar was terrible, so the next one probably will be too.”
Statistical syllogism
Appeal to authority
Inductive generalization
Argument from analogy
The answer can be found in Section 5.7, “Arguments from Analogy,” of
With Good Reason: A Guide to Critical Thinking
.
Question 16
1
/ 1
pts
The statement, “Cats are a billion times better than dogs,” uses which rhetorical device?
Euphemism
Weasel words
Proof surrogate
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
- Access to all documents
- Unlimited textbook solutions
- 24/7 expert homework help
Innuendo
Hyperbole
The answer can be found in Section 8.2, “Obstacles to Critical Thinking: Rhetorical Devices,” of
With Good Reason: A Guide to Critical Thinking
.
Question 17
1
/ 1
pts
In the hypothetico-deductive method, what can you infer if the deduced consequence of the hypothesis does not occur?
Reject the hypothesis (if the inference from the hypothesis to the consequence is valid).
Accept the hypothesis.
Choose a different consequence to test.
Redo the experiment.
Ignore those results.
The answer can be found in Section 6.4, “Reasoning About Science: The Hypothetico-Deductive Method,” of
With Good Reason: A Guide to Critical Thinking
.
Question 18
1
/ 1
pts
Is the following argument valid or invalid? “If you are under four feet tall, you
cannot go on the roller coaster. You are under four feet tall. So you cannot go on the roller coaster.”
Valid
Invalid
Impossible to tell
The answer can be found in Section 3.2, “Evaluating Deductive Arguments,” of
With Good Reason: A Guide to Critical Thinking
.
Question 19
1
/ 1
pts
The principle of accuracy in logic is __________.
the idea that scientific experiments need measures to ensure they produce good data.
the idea that one should state the strongest argument no matter the position.
the idea that we should prefer arguments that align with our beliefs.
the idea that one should interpret the argument in line with the way the author would state it.
The answer can be found in Section 9.4, “Confronting Disagreement by Seeking Truth,” of
With Good Reason: A Guide to Critical Thinking
.
Question 20
1
/ 1
pts
Is the following argument valid or invalid? “No snakes eat vegetables. Cobras
are snakes. So cobras do not eat vegetables.”
Valid
Invalid
Impossible to tell
The answer can be found in Section 3.2, “Evaluating Deductive Arguments,” of
With Good Reason: A Guide to Critical Thinking
.
Quiz Score:
15.5
out of 20
Submission Details:
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
- Access to all documents
- Unlimited textbook solutions
- 24/7 expert homework help