Review Test 2-No key.docx
pdf
keyboard_arrow_up
School
Toronto Metropolitan University *
*We aren’t endorsed by this school
Course
182
Subject
Philosophy
Date
Apr 3, 2024
Type
Pages
8
Uploaded by kwansol
Review Test 2 – no key
Inductive argument:
An argument in which the premises are intended to provide support, but
not conclusive evidence, for the conclusion
If the premises
are true, then
the conclusion
must be true
If the premises are true, then the conclusion is probably true
Induction indicator words:
Words or phrases such as “likely,” “probably,” “it’s plausible to
suppose that,” “it’s reasonable to believe that,” and “odds are that”
Inductive generalization:
Argument that relies on characteristics of a sample population (that is,
a portion of the population) to make a claim about the population as a whole
Statistical Argument:
Argues from premises regarding a percentage of a population to a
conclusion about an individual member of that population or some part of that population
Argument from analogy:
Argument that suggests that the presence of certain similarities is
evidence for further similarities
Deductive vs inductive arguments (example)
Alvin needs potassium in his diet because
all
human beings need potassium in their diets.
Most
adults can tolerate moderate amounts of sugar in their diets. Alvin is an adult, so he can
tolerate moderate amounts of sugar in his diet.
Logical Fallacies:
Weak analogy
: An arguer compares two (or more) things that aren’t really comparable in
relevant respects
Inappropriate appeal to authority
: Rely uncritically on someone’s opinion (the person is not
an authority –see advertisements
Appeal to pity
: Occurs when an arguer inappropriately attempts to evoke feelings of pity or
compassion from his listeners or readers
Appeal to Ignorance
: An arguer asserts that a claim must be true because no one has proven it
false (and vice versa)
Attacking the person (Ad Hominem)
: When you attack your opponent personally, instead of
criticizing his/her position
Inconsistency
: An arguer asserts inconsistent or contradictory claims (two beliefs in
contradiction)
Equivocation
: A key word is used in two or more senses in the same argument and the apparent
success of the argument depends on the shift in meaning.
Hasty generalization (weak inductive generalization)
: When the sample population is too
small or not representative for the population as a whole
Slippery slope
: We can’t allow A, because A will lead to B, B to C and we don’t want C (C is
terrible)
Circular reasoning (Begging the question):
An argument that goes around, in circles. A
premise states what it needs to be proven in the conclusion.
Straw man
: An arguer distorts (modifies) an opponent’s argument or claim to make it easier to
be attacked.
Appeal to Popularity (The Bandwagon Argument; Ad Populum):
Everybody (or a selective
group) does or believe X, so you should do the same.
The fallacy of composition:
arguing that what is true of the parts of something must be true of
the whole thing.
The fallacy of division
: arguing that what is true of the whole must be true of the parts
A. Identify the following fallacies:
1.
Dudley said that whenever anything would go wrong at his last job, his boss would
always say that he was responsible. I guess Dudley must be a very responsible person. I’d
better hire him (adapted from Tom Morris,
True Success
, 1994).
a)
Straw Man
b)
Slippery Slope
c)
Appeal to Pity
d)
Appeal to Ignorance
e)
Equivocation
2.
Rachel Peters has argued that assault weapons should be outlawed. Apparently, Rachel
believes that no one has the right to own firearms for purposes of self-protection. But
such a view is completely indefensible. It would leave law-abiding citizens defenseless
against predatory criminals.
a)
Attacking the Person
b) Straw Man
c)
Inappropriate Appeal to Authority
d)
Appeal to Ignorance
e)
Slippery Slope
3.
Skeptics have tried for centuries to prove that reincarnation is a myth, and no one
has
ever succeeded. Therefore, we must conclude that reincarnation is a fact.
a)
Appeal to Popularity
b)
Inconsistency
c)
Slippery Slope
d) Appeal to Ignorance
e)
Circular Reasoning
5.
Police detective
: Did you get a good look at the bank robber?
Witness
: Yes, I saw his face clearly. It was Willie, the night watchman.
Police detective
: And were you also able to recognize his voice?
Witness
: No, I couldn’t really hear what he said very well. His voice was muffled by the
full ski mask he wore.
a.
Attacking the Person
b.
Appeal to Popularity
c.
Inconsistency
d.
Slippery Slope
e.
Inappropriate Appeal to Authority
6. I am entitled to say whatever I choose because I have a right to say whatever I please.
f)
Inconsistency
g)
Slippery Slope
h)
Appeal to Pity
i)
Equivocation
j)
Circular Reasoning
7.
Jim Gibson has argued that we need to build a new middle school. But Gibson is the
owner of Gibson’s Construction Company. He’ll make a fortune if his company is picked
to build the new school. Obviously, Gibson’s argument is a lot of self-serving baloney.
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
- Access to all documents
- Unlimited textbook solutions
- 24/7 expert homework help
a.
Appeal to Pity
b.
Appeal to Ignorance
c.
Equivocation
d.
Circular Reasoning
e.
Attacking the Person (the motive)
8.
In the summer of 1940, Londoners were bombed almost every night. To be bombed is to
be intoxicated. Therefore, in the summer of 1940, Londoners were intoxicated almost
every night.
a.
Straw Man
b.
Appeal to Ignorance
c.
Equivocation
d.
Circular Reasoning
e.
Attacking the Person
9.
Professor Davis has argued that the Bible should not be read literally. Obviously, Davis
believes that any reading of the Bible is as good as any other. But this would mean that
there is no difference between a true interpretation of Scripture and a false interpretation.
Such a view is absurd.
a.
Straw Man
b.
Slippery Slope
c.
Inappropriate Appeal to Authority
d.
Appeal to Ignorance
e.
Equivocation
10. Officer, I know I was going 80 miles per hour in a 15-mile-an-hour school zone, but I
don’t deserve a speed ticket. I’ve had a really tough week. Yesterday I got fired from my
job, and last Monday my Chihuahua got eaten by a Great Dane.
a.
Inappropriate Appeal to Authority
b.
Appeal to Pity
c.
Appeal to Ignorance
d.
Equivocation
e.
Attacking the Person
11. After years of extensive scientific testing, there is no evidence that substance XYZ is
toxic to rodents. Therefore, it’s reasonable to conclude that substance XYZ is not toxic to
rodents.
a.
Inconsistency
b.
Appeal to Ignorance
c.
Equivocation
d.
Circular Reasoning
e.
Attacking the Person
13. My father said that the Super Bowl half-time show was a real disaster. That’s interesting
because I read in the newspaper that the Federal government has real funds available for victims
of disasters. So, maybe my dad can apply for some relief funds.
a.
Inappropriate Appeal to Authority
b.
Appeal to Pity
c.
Appeal to Ignorance
d.
Equivocation
e.
Attacking the Person
14. Everything written in that book is 100 percent accurate. It has to be, since nothing in it is
false.
a.
Inconsistency
b.
Appeal to Ignorance
c.
Equivocation
d.
Circular Reasoning (begging the question)
e.
Attacking the Person
15. Maybe you didn’t know that she is an orphan. Her outrageous behavior should be excused
because of her background.
a.
Inappropriate Appeal to Authority
b.
Appeal to Pity
c.
Appeal to Ignorance
d.
Equivocation
e.
Attacking the Person
16. Aliens from another planet must have built the great pyramids of Egypt because there is no
record of how they were actually constructed.
a.
Inappropriate Appeal to Authority
b.
Appeal to Pity
c.
Appeal to Ignorance
d.
Equivocation
e.
Attacking the Person
17. I am going to vote for the incumbent, senator Lowman, because my chemistry teacher said he
is the best candidate.
a. Inconsistency
b.
Straw Man
c.
Slippery Slope
d.
Inappropriate Appeal to Authority
e.
Hasty Generalization
18. Look, the picture of the Olympic basketball team is on the cereal. It must be good for
athletes.
a. Inconsistency
b.
Straw Man
c.
Slippery Slope
d.
Inappropriate Appeal to Authority
e.
Hasty Generalization
19.
A
: Professor X had an excellent idea regarding our children academic improvement.
B
: Oh, I don’t trust him. He is divorced and sometimes nasty; he doesn’t even say “Hi” when
you meet him.
(Attacking the person)
20. “God exist. How do I know? Because the Bible says so. How do I know that the Bible is
telling the truth? Because it is the inspired word of God.”
(Circular Reasoning)
21. My barber told me that Einstein’s general theory of relativity is a lot of hogwash. I guess
Einstein wasn’t as smart as everybody thinks he was.
(Innapropriate appeal to authority)
23. In a recent letter to the editor, Stella Davis argued that we should not legalize same-sex
marriage. “Allowing it, would undermine respect for traditional marriage which is the very
foundation of our society. If that foundation is destroyed, our whole society will collapse. Thus,
we must oppose the legalization of it.”
(Slippery Slope)
24.
Student to professor
: I know I missed half of your classes and failed all my exams, but I had
a really tough semester. First my pet boa constrictor died. Then my girlfriend told me she wants a
sex-change operation. With all I went through this semester, I don’t think I really deserved an F.
Any chance you might change my grade to a C or D?
(appeal to pity)
25. Pete has argued that the New York Yankees are a better baseball team than the Atlanta
Braves. But the Braves aren’t a bad team. They have a great pitching staff, and they consistently
finish at or near the top of their division. Obviously, Pete doesn’t know what he’s talking about.
(Straw Man)
26. Any law can be repealed by the proper legal authority. The law of gravity is a law. Therefore,
the law of gravity can be repealed by the proper legal authority.
(Equivocation)
27. There must be intelligent life on other planets. No one has proven that there isn’t.
(Appeal to ignorance)
28.
Moral absolutist
: I can’t believe that members of the Mabunga tribe still practice child
sacrifice. If anything is absolutely and universally wrong, it’s child sacrifice.
Moral relativist
: Hey, get with the times, man! All value judgments are relative. And that’s
the absolute true.
(Inconsistency)
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
- Access to all documents
- Unlimited textbook solutions
- 24/7 expert homework help
29. Lettuce is leafy and green and tastes great with a veggie burger. Poison ivy is also leafy and
green. Therefore, poison ivy probably tastes great with a veggie burger, too.
(Weak Analogy)
30. All bachelors are unhappy. They just interviewed the guys down at the Beta fraternity house
and they turned out to be unhappy. They got the same results down at Bernie’s Tavern.
(Hasty Generalization)
B. Determine whether the following arguments are deductive, inductive generalization,
argument by analogy or statistical argument.
1. It is decision time at Widget, Inc. The company president says: “Our market research
department has just completed the test of the new and improved Widget in three test market
areas: Dallas, Detroit, and Denver. In all three cities the consumers preferred the new Widget
over the old two to one. I think we should go for it.”
a. deductive
b. inductive generalization
c. argument by analogy
d. statistical argument
2. 60 percent of college graduates get a high-paying job after graduation. Sybil is graduating;
therefore she’ll likely have a high-paying job soon.
a. deductive
b. inductive generalization
c. argument by analogy
d. statistical argument
3. Don’t worry, Bruce will resist the health-sapping consequences of smoking, because most
people with the “lucky” gene configuration will resist and he has this configuration.
a. deductive
b. inductive generalization
c. argument by analogy
d. statistical argument
4.
Exercise is good for the vast majority of people. Therefore, it would be good for my
ninety-five-year-old grandfather to run in next year’s Boston Marathon.
a)
deductive
b)
inductive generalization
c)
argument from analogy
d) statistical argument
5.
States were justified in suing tobacco companies to recover the health-care costs
associated with smoking. Similarly, states would be justified in suing McDonald’s and
Burger King to recover the health-care costs associated with eating fatty foods.
a)
deductive
b)
inductive generalization
c)
argument from analogy
d)
statistical argument
6.
All Americans favor a constitutional amendment allowing prayer in public schools.
Melvin Bixby, president of the North American Atheist Society, is an American. So,
Melvin Bixby favors such an amendment.
a)
deductive
b)
inductive generalization
c)
argument from analogy
d)
statistical argument
7.
The fifteen winters Eric spent in New York City were cold. So, it may be that most
winters in New York City are cold.
a)
deductive
b) inductive generalization
c)
argument from analogy
d)
statistical argument
8.
Based on a survey of one hundred thousand American high school students,
approximately half go on to attend college. So, it is probably the case that about half the
people in the world have attended college.
a)
deductive
b) inductive generalization
c)
argument from analogy
d)
statistical argument
9.
Squirrels and rats are rodents of similar size and appearance. Rats cause problems in the
city, and squirrels cause problems in the suburbs. Rats should be exterminated. So,
squirrels should be exterminated.
a)
deductive
b)
inductive generalization
c)
argument from analogy
d)
statistical argument