3.1 Case Study
docx
keyboard_arrow_up
School
Arkansas State University, Main Campus *
*We aren’t endorsed by this school
Course
7203
Subject
Philosophy
Date
Dec 6, 2023
Type
docx
Pages
3
Uploaded by tamaramcdaniel
1
Case Study Responses
Case Study Responses
a. The assertion
"Moral arguments and moral discussion have a valid function in our lives
and in institutions,"
according to my interpretation, implies that participation in ethical
discussions and debates is crucial for both personal and institutional existence, further
suggesting that moral deliberation and discussion are essential components of decision-
making and the maintenance of an ethical society.
b. The principle of benefit maximization, as per my interpretation, is that ethical conduct
ought to be characterized by institutions' capacity to generate the most substantial aggregate
benefit or advantage for the majority. Notably, when making moral decisions, it emphasizes
the maximization of positive outcomes and the minimization of injury or negative
consequences, which are essential for a conducive environment.
2. Respect for all based on the
"Golden Rule"
and its three subsidiary concepts: The
"Golden
Rule,"
as per the initial interpretations, promotes treating others as one would like to be
treated, which entails treating every individual with equal regard and impartiality.
The three subsidiary concepts include:
The principle of universality entails the impartial application of identical moral
standards to all individuals.
The principle of impartiality entails rendering moral judgments devoid of preferential
treatment or prejudice towards a specific group or individual.
The principle of reciprocity states that one should anticipate receiving the same
treatment in return for treating others with integrity and respect.
2
c. In the context of case resolution, a consequentialist perspective entails evaluating the moral
correctness of an action exclusively based on its consequences as suggested by Strike (1988).
A consequentialist might contend, in the context of the cases presented in the case study, that
the actions ought to be assessed according to the positive or negative outcomes they produce.
In Miss Andrews' situation, for instance, a consequentialist might deem it ethically justifiable
to keep the entire class indoors during recess if doing so would enable the criminal to be
apprehended and a valuable lesson on honesty to be imparted.
Case resolution from a non-consequentialist perspective contends that deontology and
virtue ethics are examples of non-consequentialist ethics that emphasize the intrinsic qualities
of duties, actions, and character characteristics. Regardless of the immediate repercussions, a
non-consequentialist would prioritize whether the actions adhere to particular ethical
principles or virtues. For example, a proponent of non-consequentialism views punishment of
the entire class as unjust, even if it leads to the apprehension of the criminal because it
contradicts fundamental principles such as equity and the presumption of innocence.
Suggestion and justification for resolving the case described in the case study.
Whether the cases should be resolved from a consequentialist or non-consequentialist
perspective would be contingent upon the circumstances and ethical principles at stake.
Regarding Miss Andrews and the stolen lunch money, an ethically more justifiable standpoint
could be one of non-consequentialist reasoning. It can be argued that penalizing innocent
pupils for the conduct of a minority is unjust and contrary to the principles of justice.
Conversely, a more focused strategy, such as conducting additional research and establishing
the thief's identity via evidentiary means, would be consistent with non-consequentialist
tenets of equity and the presumption of innocence. Nonetheless, when making ethical
decisions, it is critical to consider the particulars of each circumstance and establish a balance
between the two perspectives.
3
Reference
Strike, K. A. (1988). The ethics of teaching.
The Phi Delta Kappan
,
70
(2), 156-158.
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
- Access to all documents
- Unlimited textbook solutions
- 24/7 expert homework help