PHILOSOPHY TEST QUESTIONS (1)
pdf
keyboard_arrow_up
School
Western University *
*We aren’t endorsed by this school
Course
BUS 1220
Subject
Philosophy
Date
Dec 6, 2023
Type
Pages
5
Uploaded by MagistrateBearMaster50
1 | P a g e
PHILOSOPHY 1300E/571 IN-CLASS EXAM/FALL SEMESTER
PART 1 (10 marks/5 marks each)
Instructions: Answer each with a short essay (2 1/2 pages).You may NOT use your books,
notes, etc.
1. Explain Socrates’s statement that the “life without enquiry is not worth living...” (p.526)
The statement "The life without enquiry is not worth living" attributed to Socrates, is a seminal idea in Western philosophy, encapsulating the essence of the Socratic method itself. It speaks to the crucial role of intellectual and moral inquiry in human existence. This paper aims to unpack the depth and meaning behind Socrates' statement by connecting it with philosophical theories, notably epistemology and existentialism. By delving into these philosophical branches, we can better appreciate the importance of 'enquiry' as an integral component for a life of worth and meaning.
Epistemology, the study of knowledge, is central to understanding Socrates' maxim. Socrates is often associated with the dialectic method—a form of reasoning through dialogue—
which he used to engage his fellow Athenians in intellectual discussions. His aim was not to provide them with direct answers but to guide them in identifying the fallacies in their thinking. Through constant questioning, individuals are prompted to evaluate their existing beliefs and knowledge critically.
The concept can be aligned with Karl Popper's falsifiability criterion, which suggests that for a theory to be considered scientific, it must be testable and disprovable. Socrates would have been a strong advocate for this kind of rigorous intellectual honesty. The implication here is that life without questioning our assumptions, beliefs, or the world around us is intellectually dishonest, or perhaps even 'unscientific' in a loose sense. Therefore, from an epistemological perspective, enquiry is critical for a life grounded in intellectual integrity and rigor.
To further understand the depths of Socrates' statement, we can turn to existentialism, particularly the works of philosophers like Jean-Paul Sartre and Friedrich Nietzsche. Existentialism emphasizes individual freedom, choice, and authenticity. Existentialists propose that we are condemned to be free and that we must define our essence through our actions. In this vein, Socrates' assertion can be interpreted as a call for existential authenticity.
In Sartre's terms, a life devoid of enquiry would be one lived in "bad faith," a state where individuals deceive themselves to escape the existential anxiety that comes with freedom and responsibility. On the other hand, Nietzsche's concept of the "will to power" resonates with the Socratic emphasis on intellectual courage to scrutinize even the most sacred beliefs continually.
2 | P a g e
Thus, for existentialists, life without enquiry is not just intellectually inadequate but also existentially inauthentic.
Socrates' proclamation stands at the crossroads of epistemology and existentialism. While the former focuses on intellectual rigor and scrutiny, the latter emphasizes the ethical responsibility to live authentically. Both concepts inherently call for constant questioning as a means to challenge conventional wisdom and social constructs. By doing so, one is able to live a life that not only embraces intellectual integrity but also existential authenticity.
Socrates' statement that "The life without enquiry is not worth living" is a powerful claim that compels us to consider the philosophical underpinnings of what makes a life valuable. Through the lens of epistemology, the statement advocates for intellectual rigor and honesty. From an existential perspective, it emphasizes the ethical obligation to live a life of authenticity, freedom, and individuality. Together, these philosophical theories indicate that a life without inquiry lacks both intellectual depth and existential meaning, rendering it 'unworthy' in a profound sense. Thus, to engage in enquiry is not merely an intellectual exercise, but a fundamental requirement for a life worth living.
2. What does Socrates mean when he claims that philosophy is the practice of dying? Include a consideration of the theory of forms and the indissolubility of the soul thesis in your answer.
Socrates' enigmatic assertion that "philosophy is the practice of dying" has captivated scholars and philosophers alike, generating a multitude of interpretations and debates. This statement can be understood most comprehensively when considered alongside his teachings on the Theory of Forms and the concept of the indissoluble soul. This paper aims to elucidate the profound philosophical implications of this statement by connecting it to both Platonic idealism and the philosophy of the soul. By interlinking these intricate ideas, we can grasp a more coherent understanding of what Socrates implies by equating philosophy with the practice of dying.
To understand Socrates' claim, it is essential to consider Plato's Theory of Forms, an idea likely influenced by Socrates' philosophical principles. The Theory of Forms posits a realm of ideal forms, of which the material world is but an imperfect representation. Philosophical inquiry, therefore, serves as a means of ascension from the world of appearances to the world of eternal forms, a higher plane of intellectual existence.
In this context, 'dying' could metaphorically signify a detachment from the material world and its distractions. Socratic dialectic and rigorous questioning can be understood as tools for this ascent, enabling individuals to break free from the deceptive world of sensory perceptions and move closer to a realm of pure knowledge and understanding. In this philosophical exercise, one 'dies' to the world of appearances to live for the realm of truth.
3 | P a g e
Further illumination on the statement comes from the concept of the soul's indissolubility. Socrates posits that the soul is immortal and unchanging, and it preexists its incarnation in the physical body. In dialogues like the 'Phaedo,' Socrates argues for the soul's eternal nature and discusses how the soul is entrapped in the mortal body, which serves as a barrier to true knowledge.
According to Socrates, the soul's entanglement with the body and the physical world is a form of corruption. The act of dying is thus a liberation of the soul, allowing it to return to a purer form of existence. From this viewpoint, the practice of philosophy is akin to preparing the soul for its inevitable release from the material world. Philosophical pursuit, then, is not just a method of acquiring knowledge but a means of purifying the soul, readying it for its eventual separation from the body and its union with the eternal forms.
The two theories combine to provide a holistic understanding of Socrates' claim that philosophy is the practice of dying. On the one hand, the Theory of Forms explains the cognitive aspect of this practice, where philosophical inquiry is an intellectual ascent to the realm of eternal truth. On the other, the indissolubility of the soul introduces an ethical and metaphysical dimension, positing that the soul benefits from this intellectual ascent as it prepares for its release from bodily constraints. Together, these theories suggest that philosophical inquiry serves dual purposes: it is an intellectual exercise and a form of spiritual purification.
Socrates' assertion that "philosophy is the practice of dying" is a complex idea that touches upon fundamental aspects of human existence and intellectual pursuit. When viewed through the lens of the Theory of Forms, philosophy is a method of distancing oneself from the material world to engage with a higher realm of existence. When considered in light of the concept of the indissoluble soul, philosophy becomes a preparation for the soul's ultimate liberation from bodily constraints. Therefore, in Socratic thought, to engage in philosophy is to prepare for both an intellectual and spiritual ascent, making it a practice intricately tied to the very notions of life and death.
PART 2 (5 marks/1 mark each)
Instructions: Explain each in a paragraph.
1. Select Four Presocratic Philosophers and State the Position of Each Regarding Reality
Heraclitus: Known for his doctrine of change being the fundamental nature of the universe, Heraclitus asserted that "you cannot step into the same river twice." For him, everything is in a state of flux, and stability is an illusion.
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
- Access to all documents
- Unlimited textbook solutions
- 24/7 expert homework help
4 | P a g e
Parmenides: Standing in stark contrast to Heraclitus, Parmenides posited that change is an illusion and that reality is one, unchanging, and indivisible. He challenged the senses and said that only reason could provide insight into the nature of reality.
Anaximander: A student of Thales, Anaximander proposed that the ultimate substance of reality was the "Apeiron" or the "Boundless." For him, the boundless is eternal and indestructible and is the source from which all things emanate and to which all things return.
Empedocles: Known for his cosmogonic theory, Empedocles claimed that all of reality is composed of four 'roots' or elements: earth, air, fire, and water. These elements are mixed and separated by two divine forces, Love and Strife.
2. What Fundamental Theme/Motif Underlies Presocratic Philosophy? Give Examples.
The primary motif underpinning Presocratic philosophy is the quest for the "archê," the fundamental substance or principle underlying reality. This exploration was a move away from mythological explanations to a more rational, systematic approach. For example, Thales posited water as the fundamental substance, Anaximenes chose air, and Pythagoras believed that numbers and mathematical relations constituted the essence of reality. These attempts reflected an urge to identify a foundational element or principle that could explain the diversity and change observed in the natural world.
3. Explain the "Likeness Argument" for the Indissolubility of the Soul
In Plato's "Phaedo," the likeness argument asserts that the soul is immortal because it is like the "Forms," which are eternal and unchanging. Just as the Forms are intangible and exist in a realm of perfection, the soul, by its very nature, is intangible and seeks to understand these Forms. The soul's affinity to the unchanging and the immaterial suggests its indissolubility, as it stands in contrast to the material body, which is subject to decay and death.
4. Explain the Doctrine of Recollection as Presented in the Phaedo
In Plato's "Phaedo," the Doctrine of Recollection posits that learning is essentially a process of recollection. The soul, being immortal, has knowledge of the Forms from before its incarnation in the human body. Throughout life, sensory experiences trigger the soul's memory, helping it to "recall" the Forms and the truths it already knows. Thus, learning is not a process of acquiring new knowledge but a process of recalling what the soul inherently knows.
5. Explain Socrates's Claim That We Must Never Return Wrong for Wrong in the Context of the Arguments Presented in the Crito
In Plato's "Crito," Socrates argues that it is immoral to return wrong for wrong or harm for harm. When Crito tries to persuade Socrates to escape from prison, thereby flouting the laws, Socrates refuses. His argument is grounded in a form of social contract theory; by choosing to live in Athens, he implicitly agreed to abide by its laws. To break these laws, even in response to an unjust verdict, would be to commit a wrong in return for a wrong, thereby disrupting the social harmony that laws aim to establish. This perspective embodies his ethical commitment to justice
5 | P a g e
and the principle that one should aim to be virtuous in all circumstances, regardless of the actions of others