MacKinnon Essay 1
docx
keyboard_arrow_up
School
Del Mar College *
*We aren’t endorsed by this school
Course
2306
Subject
Philosophy
Date
Feb 20, 2024
Type
docx
Pages
2
Uploaded by LittleBuddy0126
MacKinnon's Contribution to Utilitarianism: A Critical Examination
Introduction:
Utilitarianism, a consequentialist ethical theory, aims to maximize overall happiness or pleasure while minimizing suffering. Within the realm of utilitarian thought, a distinct perspective has been advanced by Susan MacKinnon, whose nuanced approach seeks to address some of the limitations and criticisms often associated with classical utilitarianism. In this essay, we will explore MacKinnon's contributions to utilitarianism, examining key aspects of her theory and evaluating its strengths and weaknesses.
MacKinnon's Utilitarian Framework:
Susan MacKinnon introduces a unique perspective within the utilitarian framework by incorporating feminist insights and considerations of social justice into the traditional calculus of pleasure and pain. Unlike classical utilitarianism, which primarily focuses on maximizing overall happiness, MacKinnon emphasizes the need to consider the experiences of marginalized groups and address systemic inequalities in her version of utilitarian ethics.
One of the central tenets of MacKinnon's utilitarianism is the recognition of the importance of individual
autonomy and agency. She contends that true happiness cannot be achieved if certain individuals or groups are systematically oppressed or denied the opportunity to exercise their autonomy. MacKinnon argues for a more inclusive utilitarianism that takes into account the diverse perspectives and needs of different social groups.
The Intersectionality of Pleasure and Pain:
MacKinnon's utilitarianism places a strong emphasis on the concept of intersectionality, recognizing that
individuals occupy multiple social identities that intersect and influence their experiences. This approach
acknowledges that factors such as gender, race, and socioeconomic status can significantly impact one's ability to experience pleasure or endure suffering. By incorporating intersectionality into the utilitarian calculus, MacKinnon attempts to create a more comprehensive and equitable framework for evaluating ethical decisions.
Critique of Classical Utilitarianism:
MacKinnon's departure from classical utilitarianism stems from her critique of its inherent shortcomings.
Classical utilitarianism, often associated with philosophers like Jeremy Bentham and John Stuart Mill, has been criticized for its focus on aggregate happiness without sufficient attention to individual rights, justice, and the potential for the exploitation of minority interests.
MacKinnon argues that the classical utilitarian approach may lead to the marginalization of certain groups, as the pursuit of overall happiness might ignore or even perpetuate existing social injustices. Her
utilitarianism seeks to remedy these issues by adopting a more nuanced and socially conscious approach
that considers the impact of ethical decisions on different social groups.
Challenges and Limitations:
While MacKinnon's utilitarianism brings valuable insights and addresses some of the criticisms leveled against classical utilitarianism, it is not without its challenges. Critics argue that the incorporation of intersectionality may complicate the utilitarian calculus, making it difficult to determine the overall consequences of an action. Additionally, the subjective nature of pleasure and pain poses a challenge, as
individuals may have different interpretations of what constitutes happiness or suffering.
Conclusion:
Susan MacKinnon's utilitarianism represents a significant departure from classical perspectives, introducing a more socially conscious and inclusive framework. By incorporating intersectionality and prioritizing individual autonomy, MacKinnon aims to create a utilitarian ethic that addresses the complexities of contemporary society. While her approach has garnered praise for its responsiveness to social justice concerns, it also faces challenges that warrant further exploration and refinement. As the conversation on ethics evolves, MacKinnon's utilitarianism stands as a thought-provoking contribution that encourages a more comprehensive and equitable consideration of the consequences of our actions.
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
- Access to all documents
- Unlimited textbook solutions
- 24/7 expert homework help