NURS_6050_Module01_Week02_Assignment_Rubric

NURS 6050 Module01l Week02 Assignment_Rubric Criteria Part 1: Agenda Comparison GridExplain how each of the presidential administrations approached the issue. ldentify the allocations of resources that the two presidents dedicated to this issue. Part 2: Agenda Comparison Grid Analysis- Address the following:Which administrative agency would most likely be responsible for helping you address the healthcare issue you selected? Why is this agency most helpful? How do you think your selected healthcare issue might get on the agenda? How does it stay there?Who would you choose to be the entrepreneur/ champion/sponsor of the healthcare issue you selected and justify your selection. 20 to >17.0 pts Excellent The response clearly and accurately explains how the presidential administrations approached the issue and identifies the resource allocations dedicated to the issue. 25 to >22.0 pts Excellent The response clearly and accurately identifies an administrative agency most likely to be responsible for addressing the selected healthcare issue and why that agency is most helpful. ...Response clearly and accurately explains how the healthcare issue gets on the agenda and remains there. ..The response clearly and accurately identifies and justifies the entrepreneur/champion/sponsor of the healthcare issue selected. Ratings 17 to >15.0 pts 15 to >13.0 pts Good Fair The response accurately explains how the presidential administrations approached the issue and identifies the resource allocations dedicated to the issue. 22 to >19.0 pts Good The response identifies an administrative agency most likely to be responsible for addressing the selected healthcare issue and why that agency is most helpful. ...Response clearly and accurately explains how the healthcare issue gets on the agenda and remains there. ...Identification and justification of the The response is vague or partially inaccurate in its explanation of how the presidential administrations approached the issue, and/or in the identification of the resources allocated to the issue. 19 to >17.0 pts Fair " The identification of an | administrative agency ‘ responsible for addressing the selected healthcare issue is | vague or inaccurate and justification is inaccurate or misaligned for why that agency | is most helpful. ...Explanation of how the healthcare issue gets on the agenda and remains there is vague or inaccurate. | ...Identification and/or entrepreneur/champion/sponsor | of the healthcare issue is included. justification of the entrepreneur/champion/sponsor of the healthcare issue selected is inaccurate or does not align with the healthcare issue. 13 to >0 pts | Poor The response is missing or inaccurate in its explanation of how the presidential administrations approached the issue, and/or in the identification of the resources allocated to the issue. 17 to >0 pts Poor Identification of an administrative agency responsible for addressing the selected healthcare issue is missing. ...Explanation of how the healthcare issue gets on the agenda and remains there is inaccurate or missing. ...Identification and/or justification of the entrepreneur/champion/sponsor of the healthcare issue selected is inaccurate or missing. Pts 20 pts 25 pts

Part 3: Fact SheetBased on your Agenda Comparison Grid for the healthcare issue you selected, develop a 1-2-page narrative that you could use to communicate with a policy- maker/legislator or a member of their staff for this healthcare issue.Summarize why this healthcare issue is important and should be included in the agenda for legislation.Justify the role of the nurse in agenda setting for healthcare issues Resources Written Expression and Formatting: ParagraphParagraphs make clear points that support well developed ideas, low logically, and demonstrate continuity of ideas. Sentences are carefully focused-- neither long and rambling nor short and lacking substance. Written Expression and Formatting: English Writing StandardsCorrect grammar, mechanics, and proper punctuation. 30 to >26.0 pts Excellent Creates an accurate and thorough fact sheet. ...Using sufficient evidence, the response provides an accurate synthesis of evidence on why this healthcare issue is important and should be included in the agenda for legislation. ...Response accurately justifies 26 to >23.0 pts Good Creates an accurate fact sheet. ...Using sufficient evidence, the response provides an accurate summary evidence on why this healthcare issue is important and should be included in the agenda for legislation. ...Response accurately justifies the role of the nurse in agenda 23 to >20.0 pts Fair Creates a fact sheet that is partially accurate or incomplete. ...Response provides an incomplete or inaccurate summary of evidence on why this healthcare issue is important and should be included in the agenda for legislation. ...Response partially or inaccurately justifies 20 to >0 pts Poor Creates a fact sheet that is inaccurate or incomplete. ...Response provides an inaccurate summary of evidence or evidence is missing on why this healthcare issue is important and should be included in the agenda for legislation. ...Response the role of the nurse in agenda setting for healthcare issues. the role of the nurse in agenda justifying the role of the nurse 30 pts setting for healthcare issues. setting for healthcare issues. in agenda setting for healthcare issues is inaccurate and incomplete or missing. 10 to >8.0 pts 8to >7.0 pts 7 to >6.0 pts 6 to >0 pts Excellent Good Fair Poor Response includes 3 or more course Response includes 2-3 course Response includes fewer than 2 course Response includes 2 10 pts resources and 2 or more outside resources and 2 outside resources and/or fewer than 2 outside or fewer resources. sources. sources. resources. | 5to >4.0 pts 4 to >3.0 pts 3to >2.0 pts 2to >0 pts Excellent Good Fair Poor Paragraphs and sentences Paragraphs and sentences follow Paragraphs and sentences follow Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for writing standards for flow, writing standards for flow, follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity. continuity, and clarity 80% of the | continuity, and clarity 60%-79% of | flow, continuity, and clarity < time. the time. 60% of the time. 5 pts 5to >4.0 pts 4 to >3.0 pts 3to >2.0 pts 2to >0pts Excellent Good Fair Poor Uses correct grammar, Contains a few (1-2) Contains several (3-4) Contains many (25) grammar, spelling, and spelling, and punctuation grammar, spelling, and grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors that interfere with the 5 pts with no errors. punctuation errors. punctuation errors. reader’s understanding.