NSG5210 PART 2 INSTRUCTIONS

docx

School

The University of Nairobi *

*We aren’t endorsed by this school

Course

2201C

Subject

Nursing

Date

Nov 24, 2024

Type

docx

Pages

5

Uploaded by musunguarnold8

Report
Class, These are the added components for your part II. I suggest adding them after your Outcome paragraph and combine your previous conclusion with the added information from these components to make a new conclusion at the end of these sections. Search Strategy and Results This section should include a description of keywords, inclusion and exclusion criteria, which databases were searched and the results of the search. You also need to identify Figure 1, which is a diagram showing the results of your search. Your final number of primary research studies and/or systematic reviews after exclusion criteria is applied should be between five and ten. If you have more than that, then you need to narrow your search, perhaps by publication date range. You need to identify why you eliminate any primary research studies or systematic reviews that meet your inclusion criteria and do not meet your exclusion criteria. One acceptable reason would be poor quality of study. These studies should ideally be studies from the United States unless international studies are significant to answer the question because healthcare systems are very different around the world. (NOTE: If you did not find at least 5-10 primary research studies and/or systematic reviews to answer your clinical question, it is a research question rather than an EBP question and you need to change your question.) Synthesis of the Literature Synthesize your final primary research studies and/or systematic reviews; do not include summary articles such as a review of the literature, a clinical article, or a clinical practice guidelines. This section is all about the scientific evidence rather than someone else’s opinion of the evidence. Do not use secondary sources; you need to get the article, read it, and make your own decision about quality and applicability to your question even if you did find out about the study in a review of the literature. The studies that you cite in this section must relate directly to your PICOT question. This is a synthesis (Table 1) rather than a study-by-study review. Address the similarities, differences, and controversies in the body of evidence . Practice Recommendations So. . . using available best evidence, what is the answer to your question? This section is for you to summarize the strength of the body of evidence (quality, quantity, and consistency), make a summary statement, and, based on your conclusions drawn from your review of the body of evidence related to your clinical question, give a recommendation for practice change. This would logically be the
intervention of your PICO question. You might want to design an algorithm and include it in as a figure. Perhaps you found substantiation for usual practice, and you recommend reinforcement and education regarding this best practice. Conclusion The conclusion should start with a statement regarding the intention of the paper and your achievement toward that intention. Also, it should briefly say what was included in the paper. Remember that the introduction is a preview and this section should contain a summary. Other components for your Part II: Synthesis Matrix (this table may be single space and 10-point font; ONLY primary research articles or systematic reviews should be in this table) (example provided regarding effective pain management) Main ideas Al-Shaer, D., Hill, P. D., & Anderson, M. A. (2011). Nurses' knowledge and attitudes regarding pain assessment and intervention. Medsurg Nursing: Official Journal of The Academy of Medical- Surgical Nurses , 20 (1), 7-11. Reference 2 Reference 3 Reference 4 Reference 5 Add columns as necessary Use of analgesics Use of nonpharmacologic methods
Nursing students and practicing nurses need more education related to effective pain management. Need for healthcare professional education Need for patient education Add rows as necessary The next part: Primary Research Evidence table (this table may be single space and 10-point font; ONLY primary research articles should be in this table) Example provided. Please see the announcement regarding the differences between primary and secondary research. Citation (in APA 7 th ) Question, Hypothesis, or Aims Research Design (include tools) and Sample Size Key Findings Recommendations/ Implications NHNEBP Level of Evidence/ Quality Al-Shaer, D., Hill, P. D., & Anderson, M. A. (2011). Nurses' knowledge and attitudes regarding pain Identify nurses’ knowledge regarding pain assessment and intervention and the Research Design: Non-experimental, descriptive Research Tools Used: Nurses' Nurses’ lack a general knowledge of pain management concepts Education regarding pain assessment and particularly pain management needs to be III/Good
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
  • Access to all documents
  • Unlimited textbook solutions
  • 24/7 expert homework help
Citation (in APA 7 th ) Question, Hypothesis, or Aims Research Design (include tools) and Sample Size Key Findings Recommendations/ Implications NHNEBP Level of Evidence/ Quality assessment and intervention. Medsurg Nursing: Official Journal of The Academy of Medical-Surgical Nurses , 20 (1), 7-11. influences, if any, of selected demographic variables on knowledge of pain management principles. Knowledge and Attitude Survey Regarding Pain (NKAS) Sample Size: A convenience sample of 129 registered nurses (representing 10 different nursing units) from a Midwestern metropolitan hospital was utilized. Data Analysis: Descriptive statistics were used to examine normality of the data and describe the sample Independent t-tests and one-way analysis were used to examine differences in knowledge scores with categorical demographic variables Chi-square test was used to examine differences in proportions with categorical variables. and interventions. Greater emphasis on pain management should be taught in schools. Nurses must be reminded that pain is a subjective experience a high priority. \
These two tables should help you to synthesize your research throughout your paper for the synthesis review section: This section is all about the scientific evidence rather than someone else’s opinion of the evidence. Do not use secondary sources ; you need to get the article, read it, and make your own decision about quality and applicability to your question even if you did find out about the study in a review of the literature. The studies that you cite in this section must relate directly to your PICOT question. This is a synthesis (Table 1) rather than a study-by-study review. Address the similarities, differences, and controversies in the body of evidence . READ THE RUBRIC! Ensure you are putting each piece of necessary information in your paper and PLEASE use APA level I headers to indicate your sections. I hope this helps. Please let me know if I can assist you further. Dr. K