Experiment seven_ Conservation of Energy

pdf

School

University of Illinois, Urbana Champaign *

*We aren’t endorsed by this school

Course

102

Subject

Mechanical Engineering

Date

Apr 3, 2024

Type

pdf

Pages

9

Uploaded by DrBookPony31

Report
Alexis Ortiz Experiment 7 A20532815 Experiment seven: Conservation of Energy 1. Introduction: The purpose of this experiment is to study the conversions of one type of energy to another and recognize the relationships between spring potential energy and gravitational potential energy and between kinetic energy and potential energy. The total energy of a system is defined as: (1) ? = 𝐾 + ? Where E is the total mechanical energy of the system, K is the total kinetic energy of the system, and U is the total potential energy of the system. The mathematical equation used to calculate the potential spring energy is: (2) ? ? = 1 2 ?? 2 Where is the spring potential energy of the system, k is the spring constant of ? ? the spring, and x is the displacement of the spring. The mathematical equation used to calculate the potential gravitational energy is: (3) ? = ?𝑔? Where is the potential gravitational energy, m is the mass of the system, g is ? 𝑔 the gravitational acceleration of Earth (9.8 ), and y is the height the mass dropped in ? ? 2 meters. The mathematical equation used to calculate the kinetic energy of the system is: K= m (4) 1 2 𝑣 2 Where m is the mass of the system and v is the velocity of the glider going through the photogate. The mathematical equation used to calculate the velocity of the glider is: (5) ? = ? ? Where V is the velocity of the glider, l is the length of the flag on the glider, and t is the time through the photogate. The equation used to calculate the force of the system is: (6) ? =− ??
Alexis Ortiz Experiment 7 A20532815 Where F is the force acting on the glider, k is the spring constant of the spring, and x is the distance the spring is compressed. 2. Experimental Procedures: Materials and equipment needed for the experiment are: a photogate, a set of assorted round weights, PASCO computer software and sensor, force sensor, measuring tape, 3 blocks, linear air track, a balance, and a piece of string. Part 0: 1. The balance was zeroed, then the mass of the glider was measured. 2. The PASCO software was connected to the force sensor. The force sensor was connected to a pole to ensure the sensor didn’t move. 3. The air track was turned on. 4. A string was connected to the hook of the force sensor and glider. 5. On the air track, the glider was pushed against the spring and the spring was compressed a measured distance and then released. 6. The force sensor calculated the resultant force of the glider. This process was repeated twice. 7. The compression distance was changed and steps 4 and 5 were repeated. This process was repeated 3 more times. 8. Using equation 6, the experimental spring constant of each point was calculated. These values were plotted on a graph, which gave the spring constant. Part 1: 1. With the air track still turned on and the glider still connected to the string, the photogate was connected to the PASCO software and was placed extremely close to the glider to ensure accuracy in the recorded velocity. 2. The glider was pushed against the string and the spring was compressed a measured distance and then released. 3. The photogate calculated the velocity of the glider using equation 5. This process was repeated twice. 4. 40 grams of weights were added to the glider (20 on each side) and steps 3 and 4 were repeated. This process was repeated one more time. 5. The distance the spring was compressed was changed 2 times and steps 3-5 were repeated for every change in compression distance. 6. Using equation 2, the potential spring energy of each point was calculated. Using equation 4, the kinetic energy of the system was calculated. Part 2:
Alexis Ortiz Experiment 7 A20532815 1. With the mass of the glider being constant (0.270 kilograms), a block was put under the far side of the air track to create an upward slope for the glider to travel. 2. The height of the glider at the higher photogate height and at the lower height against the spring were measured, recorded, and then subtracted from each other to find the change in vertical distance (height). 3. The glider was pushed against the spring and the spring was compressed then released. 4. As the glider passed through the photogate, it measured the velocity of the glider using equation 4, which was recorded. 5. The height difference was changed 2 more times by adding blocks to the far underside of the air track. 6. Steps 3-5 were repeated for 2 other additional compressions. 7. Using equation 2, the spring potential energy was calculated. Using equation 3, the gravitational potential energy was calculated. 3. Results and Analysis : Table 1: Table 1 shows the distance the spring was compressed, the resultant force, and the calculated spring constant value of each trial from part 0. Distance (m) Force (N) k (N/m) Trials 0.22 21.11 95.95455 Trial 1 0.22 21.30 96.81818 Trial 2 0.22 22.42 101.9091 Trial 3 0.30 23.35 77.83333 Trial 1 0.30 20.20 67.33333 Trial 2 0.30 23.46 78.20000 Trial 3 0.37 29.84 80.64865 Trial 1 0.37 29.33 79.27027 Trial 2 0.37 29.97 81.00000 Trial 3 0.46 37.45 81.41304 Trial 1 0.46 36.23 78.76087 Trial 2 0.46 33.34 72.47826 Trial 3
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
  • Access to all documents
  • Unlimited textbook solutions
  • 24/7 expert homework help
Alexis Ortiz Experiment 7 A20532815 0.57 43.4 76.14035 Trial 1 0.57 39.96 70.10526 Trial 2 0.57 44.75 78.50877 Trial 3 Based on table 1, graph 1 shows the relationship between the force and compression of the spring. Graph 1: From graph 1, the line of best fit was found to be 64.65, which demonstrates the relationship between the force and distance the spring was compressed.This figure represents the spring constant of the spring used in the experiment (based on equation 6). There is a 6.09% error in this part of the experiment, which suggests that the found values of the experiment are relatively accurate. Potential sources of minor error may be due to a minimal external force having been applied to the glider as the point of release. Table 2: Table 2 shows the compression distance of the spring, the mass of the glider (w/ added weights), the velocity of the glider, the calculated values of the spring potential energy and kinetic energy, and the percent difference between the two energies. Distance (m) Mass (kg) Velocity (m/s) Us (J) KE (J) % diff
Alexis Ortiz Experiment 7 A20532815 0.3 0.19 1.25 2.90925 0.148438 180.5817 0.3 0.19 1.19 2.90925 0.134530 182.3207 0.3 0.19 1.21 2.90925 0.139090 181.7488 0.3 0.23 1.04 2.90925 0.124384 183.5993 0.3 0.23 1.02 2.90925 0.119646 184.1994 0.3 0.23 1.00 2.90925 0.115000 184.7896 0.3 0.27 0.91 2.90925 0.111794 185.1980 0.3 0.27 0.91 2.90925 0.111794 185.1980 0.3 0.27 0.91 2.90925 0.111794 185.1980 0.5 0.19 1.54 8.08125 0.225302 189.1506 0.5 0.19 1.57 8.08125 0.234166 188.7358 0.5 0.19 1.56 8.08125 0.231192 188.8749 0.5 0.23 1.44 8.08125 0.238464 188.535 0.5 0.23 1.42 8.08125 0.231886 188.8424 0.5 0.23 1.46 8.08125 0.245134 188.2237 0.5 0.27 1.33 8.08125 0.238802 188.5192 0.5 0.27 1.35 8.08125 0.246038 188.1816 0.5 0.27 1.34 8.08125 0.242406 188.351 0.6 0.19 1.53 11.637 0.222386 192.4993 0.6 0.19 1.56 11.637 0.231192 192.208 0.6 0.19 1.52 11.637 0.219488 192.5952 0.6 0.23 1.42 11.637 0.231886 192.1851 0.6 0.23 1.4 11.637 0.2254 192.3995
Alexis Ortiz Experiment 7 A20532815 0.6 0.23 1.41 11.637 0.228632 192.2926 0.6 0.27 1.31 11.637 0.231674 192.1921 0.6 0.27 1.28 11.637 0.221184 192.539 0.6 0.27 1.26 11.637 0.214326 192.7662 Based on Table 2, graph 2 shows the relationship between the kinetic energy of the glider and the spring potential energy of the spring. From graph 2, the line of best fit was calculated to be 0.0123, which represents the experimental ratio between the spring potential energy and the kinetic energy. This result is very different from the 1:1 ratio that is expected in a fully conserved system. With the coefficient of determination being 0.7359, it is highly unlikely that the system conserved all its energy and that the data was very accurate. The most probable source of error was friction stemming from the glider and the air track. However, friction cannot fully account for this disparity. Other likely sources of error include the spring not being uniformly compressed, an external force on the glider at the point of release, the string not being lined up perfectly with the rest of the system, and errors in the measurement of the compression distance. Table 3: Table 3 shows the compression distance of the spring, the height difference between the release point and the photogate, the mass of the glider, the calculated values
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
  • Access to all documents
  • Unlimited textbook solutions
  • 24/7 expert homework help
Alexis Ortiz Experiment 7 A20532815 for the potential energies and kinetic energy, the energy after the release and the percent difference between the potential spring energy and the energy after the release. Distance (m) H-h (m) Velocity (m/s) Mass (kg) Us (J) Ug (J) K(J) Energy after release (? 𝑔 + 𝐾) Percent difference 0.05 4.00E-03 1.22 0.27 0.080813 1.06E-02 2.01E-01 2.12E-01 8.94E+01 0.05 4.00E-03 1.22 0.27 0.080813 1.06E-02 2.01E-01 2.12E-01 8.94E+01 0.05 4.00E-03 1.25 0.27 0.080813 1.06E-02 2.11E-01 2.22E-01 9.31E+01 0.05 2.30E-02 1.14 0.27 0.080813 6.09E-02 1.75E-01 2.36E-01 9.81E+01 0.05 2.30E-02 1.14 0.27 0.080813 6.09E-02 1.75E-01 2.36E-01 9.81E+01 0.05 2.30E-02 1.15 0.27 0.080813 6.09E-02 1.79E-01 2.39E-01 9.91E+01 0.05 3.40E-02 1.05 0.27 0.080813 9.01E-02 1.49E-01 2.39E-01 9.89E+01 0.05 3.40E-02 1.07 0.27 0.080813 9.01E-02 1.55E-01 2.45E-01 1.01E+02 0.05 3.40E-02 1.1 0.27 0.080813 9.01E-02 1.63E-01 2.53E-01 1.03E+02 0.04 3.40E-02 0.72 0.27 0.05172 9.01E-02 7.00E-02 1.60E-01 1.02E+02 0.04 3.40E-02 0.71 0.27 0.05172 9.01E-02 6.81E-02 1.58E-01 1.01E+02 0.04 3.40E-02 0.71 0.27 0.05172 9.01E-02 6.81E-02 1.58E-01 1.01E+02 0.04 2.30E-02 0.83 0.27 0.05172 6.09E-02 9.30E-02 1.54E-01 9.94E+01 0.04 2.30E-02 0.84 0.27 0.05172 6.09E-02 9.53E-02 1.56E-01 1.00E+02 0.04 2.30E-02 0.83 0.27 0.05172 6.09E-02 9.30E-02 1.54E-01 9.94E+01 0.04 4.00E-03 0.91 0.27 0.05172 1.06E-02 1.12E-01 1.22E-01 8.12E+01 0.04 4.00E-03 0.93 0.27 0.05172 1.06E-02 1.17E-01 1.27E-01 8.45E+01 0.04 4.00E-03 0.93 0.27 0.05172 1.06E-02 1.17E-01 1.27E-01 8.45E+01 0.065 4.00E-03 1.78 0.27 0.136573 1.06E-02 4.28E-01 4.38E-01 1.05E+02
Alexis Ortiz Experiment 7 A20532815 0.065 4.00E-03 1.79 0.27 0.136573 1.06E-02 4.33E-01 4.43E-01 1.06E+02 0.065 4.00E-03 1.78 0.27 0.136573 1.06E-02 4.28E-01 4.38E-01 1.05E+02 0.065 2.30E-02 1.73 0.27 0.136573 6.09E-02 4.04E-01 4.65E-01 1.09E+02 0.065 2.30E-02 1.74 0.27 0.136573 6.09E-02 4.09E-01 4.70E-01 1.10E+02 0.065 2.30E-02 1.75 0.27 0.136573 6.09E-02 4.13E-01 4.74E-01 1.11E+02 0.065 3.40E-02 1.66 0.27 0.136573 9.01E-02 3.72E-01 4.62E-01 1.09E+02 0.065 3.40E-02 1.66 0.27 0.136573 9.01E-02 3.72E-01 4.62E-01 1.09E+02 0.065 3.40E-02 1.66 0.27 0.136573 9.01E-02 3.72E-01 4.62E-01 1.09E+02 Based on Table 3, graph 3 shows the relationship between the spring potential energy and the energy after the glider was released. From graph 3, the line of best fit was calculated to be 0.2651, which is the ratio of the spring potential energy and the energy after the release. This result differs from the expected 1:1 ratio that would occur in a conserved system, which means that there were nonconservative forces acting on the glider. This result also implies that 73.49% of the energy of the system was lost. Friction between the air track and the glider or with the string is the most probable of being a source of air. Additionally, a miscalculation in the
Alexis Ortiz Experiment 7 A20532815 height difference of the glider’s positions and the system not being perfectly centered are additional plausible sources of error 4. Conclusion: 5. Data sheets: see below
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
  • Access to all documents
  • Unlimited textbook solutions
  • 24/7 expert homework help